TheReaper
Legend
★★
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2018
- Posts
- 3,626
I start by saying that "objectification" is an issue only for a determinate part of feminists.
The ones who think that there shouldn't be any standard in order to judge females behaviors(this group supports objectification and whatever women do because they don't think society should have the right to tell them how to act) are ok with it.
On the other hand the ones who think that the idea of femininity created by men should be destroyed and replaced with a concept of femininity created by women are against objectification(they want new standards but they still think women should act accordingly to certain principles).
The second group kept opposing to the use of attractive females in the commercials mainly because using a foid to sponsoring a beer or a car was benefitting men(the owner of the factories and the workers are mostly men since we know females are mainly employed as clerks,secretaries and other social jobs).
This kind of objectification was useful to men and was deemed negative and immoral.
Then we witnessed to the birth of internet sites like Patreon and OnlyFans with women presenting themselves as sexual objects for their personal benefit, and guess what?
Suddenly people stopped complaining about OBJ. even if the phenomenon kept growing bigger.
This is it. I just wanted to underline the hypocrisy of being concerned about OBJ. only when men are gaining something from it, but at the same time being supportive of it as long as women are the ones getting the "good money".
The ones who think that there shouldn't be any standard in order to judge females behaviors(this group supports objectification and whatever women do because they don't think society should have the right to tell them how to act) are ok with it.
On the other hand the ones who think that the idea of femininity created by men should be destroyed and replaced with a concept of femininity created by women are against objectification(they want new standards but they still think women should act accordingly to certain principles).
The second group kept opposing to the use of attractive females in the commercials mainly because using a foid to sponsoring a beer or a car was benefitting men(the owner of the factories and the workers are mostly men since we know females are mainly employed as clerks,secretaries and other social jobs).
This kind of objectification was useful to men and was deemed negative and immoral.
Then we witnessed to the birth of internet sites like Patreon and OnlyFans with women presenting themselves as sexual objects for their personal benefit, and guess what?
Suddenly people stopped complaining about OBJ. even if the phenomenon kept growing bigger.
This is it. I just wanted to underline the hypocrisy of being concerned about OBJ. only when men are gaining something from it, but at the same time being supportive of it as long as women are the ones getting the "good money".