New York Times essay says you should mate with short people to save the planet
An essay written by author, Mara Altman, for the New York Times insisted that being short is “better” for the future to the amusement of several Twitter users on Sunday and Monday.
trib.al
A guest essay for the New York Times insisted that being short is “better” for the future to the amusement of several Twitter users on Sunday and Monday.
“The short are also inherent conservationists, which is more crucial than ever in this world of eight billion. Thomas Samaras, who has been studying height for 40 years and is known in small circles as the Godfather of Shrink Think, a widely unknown philosophy that considers small superior, calculated that if we kept our proportions the same but were just 10 percent shorter in America alone, we would save 87 million tons of food per year (not to mention trillions of gallons of water, quadrillions of B.T.U.s of energy and millions of tons of trash),” she wrote.
Altman continued, “Short people don’t just save resources, but as resources become scarcer because of the earth’s growing population and global warming, they may also be best suited for long-term survival (and not just because more of us will be able to jam into spaceships when we are forced off this planet we wrecked).”
Toilet Altman went as far as to suggest people begin purposefully mating with shorter people in order to produce a shorter society.
“When you mate with shorter people, you’re potentially saving the planet by shrinking the needs of subsequent generations. Lowering the height minimum for prospective partners on your dating profile is a step toward a greener planet”
JFL yeah toilets will surely be in control of their own biology and mate with short men after hearing this essay, even if you give a concrete philosophical idea backed with science, toilets still would not give a single shit and would still date tall men also because they’re low iq and only think with their emotions not logic.
