- Nov 8, 2017
Letmego said:No, not really. I imagine having it sewn shut like that makes it reek like hell. Plus they cant piss properly. They are gross enough down there as it is. It doesnt actually tighten them either. Waste of time. We aren't barbarians.
universallyabhorred said:It is both aesthetically pleasing to look at and reduces female promiscuity, at least type I is necessary although type II is ideal and type III is personally excessive imo. Also, even with type III there is a large enough hole for females to piss with. It does not matter if it reeks since no self respecting man is going to put his face down there.
Letmego said:With type III there is not a hole large enough to piss with, its actually quite a common problem. I dont wanna put ,y cock in something that smells that bad either lmao.
Anonymous said:I've honestly never had a problem with female genital mutilation. I see it as a valid, preventative measure to whoredom, as any penetration would be extremely painful. Figure 4 being the best option for couples looking to getting married.
universallyabhorred said:LOL what makes you think regular pussy smells good? Also I specifically mentioned that type III was a bit excessive in fact the female would have to its orifice re-opened before having sex, so it is unlikely you would even be able to fuck a femoid with type III. Also why does it matter to you if the female is able to urinate properly or not?
knajjd said:reminder that the clitoris is an UNDEVELOPED PENIS, and that a female cannot be fully and truly female before that disgusting thing is cut off.