![slashER](/data/avatars/m/58/58217.jpg?1724337113)
slashER
April 13, 2002
★★★
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2023
- Posts
- 2,265
Many studies have found that, of course, muscular men who train their physical strength are more desirable to women. But is the feeling mutual?
No.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Some evolutionary theories suggest that men may be more attracted to physical traits in women that signal fertility and reproductive health, such as a lower waist-to-hip ratio or softer body features. Muscularity might be seen as less aligned with these signals.
Women who do not meet these requirements are often perceived as much more masculine and feel out of place in evolutionary terms. Men would essentially perceive them as another man and NOT a potential reproductive mate.
And before the simps execute me, i'm talking about these types of women:
Not these:
If you are sexually attracted to the first visual example, you are essentially getting hard to another man![FeelsHaha :feelshaha: :feelshaha:]()
In conclusion if you would fuck anything with two x chromosomes or a pussy even if it basically looks like a dude, then you are gay according to science.
No.
This paper examines the role of body fat distribution as measured by waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) on the judgment of women's physical attractiveness. It presents evidence that WHR is correlated with a woman's reproductive endocrinological status and long-term health risk. Three studies were conducted to investigate whether humans have perceptual and cognitive mechanisms to utilize the WHR to infer attributes of women's health, youthfulness, attractiveness, and reproductive capacity. College-age as well as older subjects of both sexes rank female figures with normal weight and low WHR as attractive and assign to them higher reproductive capability. The study concludes that WHR is a reliable and honest signal of a woman's reproductive potential. The adaptive significance of body fat distribution and its role in mate selection is also discussed.
![pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov%2Fpubmed%2Fpersistent%2Fpubmed-meta-image-v2.jpg&hash=effb31294c2648ce1a11cc1b65743b58&return_error=1)
Body shape and women's attractiveness : The critical role of waist-to-hip ratio - PubMed
This paper examines the role of body fat distribution as measured by waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) on the judgment of women's physical attractiveness. It presents evidence that WHR is correlated with a woman's reproductive endocrinological status and long-term health risk. Three studies were...
![pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov%2Fcoreutils%2Fnwds%2Fimg%2Ffavicons%2Ffavicon.png&hash=fd98ae0aaf974f3242262505db86d707&return_error=1)
Some evolutionary theories suggest that men may be more attracted to physical traits in women that signal fertility and reproductive health, such as a lower waist-to-hip ratio or softer body features. Muscularity might be seen as less aligned with these signals.
Women who do not meet these requirements are often perceived as much more masculine and feel out of place in evolutionary terms. Men would essentially perceive them as another man and NOT a potential reproductive mate.
And before the simps execute me, i'm talking about these types of women:
Not these:
If you are sexually attracted to the first visual example, you are essentially getting hard to another man
In conclusion if you would fuck anything with two x chromosomes or a pussy even if it basically looks like a dude, then you are gay according to science.