Discussion Not considering women only as objects is a gay thing to do

[Cnidoblastos]

If you're a heterosexual man, you can look at women as objects. Whether for sex, housework or reproduction. Anything other than that is homosexual. Nature made women only to complement men and satisfy their desires. Anything outside of that is abnormal, just like homosexuality. Only gays see women as more than man's basic needs.

 

[BasedAdam]

Agree but sometimes i just want a girl to brush my hair and tell me everything will be alright which is mad gay but still i want to feel the warmth of a woman sometimes maybe not as gay as i explained it but you get me

 

[Moroccancel]

Absolutely. Imagine thinking foids can truely love.

 

[Cnidoblastos]

Agree but sometimes i just want a girl to brush my hair and tell me everything will be alright which is mad gay but still i want to feel the warmth of a woman sometimes maybe not as gay as i explained it but you get me

But this is a basic need of yours. Women were made to satisfy our needs.

 

[Cnidoblastos]

Absolutely. Imagine thinking foids can truely love.

 

[Mecoja]

In my fantasy i would love my wife and my wife would love me. In reality i hate every woman and every woman hates me.

 

[BasedAdam]

In my fantasy i would love my wife and my wife would love me. In reality i hate every woman and every woman hates me.

 

[aswellfella]

They're a support class, alright. But they need to be respected. And I'm not just saying that to be contrarian here. What do you think caused feminism in the first place? If God exists, he made women to be our companions. If we treat our companions poorly (as men of the past did) we shouldn't surprised when they lash back at us (which is the socio-political climate of gender relations we see today).

 

[KeepCoping]

Agree but sometimes i just want a girl to brush my hair and tell me everything will be alright which is mad gay but still i want to feel the warmth of a woman sometimes maybe not as gay as i explained it but you get me

Same. I can only imagine it, because it will never happen. Foids are evil.

 

[faded]

Agree but sometimes i just want a girl to brush my hair and tell me everything will be alright which is mad gay but still i want to feel the warmth of a woman sometimes maybe not as gay as i explained it but you get me

 

[Cock'nBalls]

foids aren't metaphysical, of course they are objects, they take up space and have mass.

 

[Dealer of Kangas]

Who doesn’t

 

[imouto]

If you're a heterosexual man, you can look at women as objects. Whether for sex, housework or reproduction. Anything other than that is homosexual. Nature made women only to complement men and satisfy their desires. Anything outside of that is abnormal, just like homosexuality. Only gays see women as more than man's basic needs.

3d women as objects? Yes
2d girls as objects? No

I don't mind being labelled gay.

 

[Friezacel]

Agree but sometimes i just want a girl to brush my hair and tell me everything will be alright which is mad gay but still i want to feel the warmth of a woman sometimes maybe not as gay as i explained it but you get me

Maybe in the next life

 

[SoycuckGodOfReddit]

Absolutely. Imagine thinking foids can truely love.

 

[SoycuckGodOfReddit]

They're a support class, alright. But they need to be respected. And I'm not just saying that to be contrarian here. What do you think caused feminism in the first place? If God exists, he made women to be our companions. If we treat our companions poorly (as men of the past did) we shouldn't surprised when they lash back at us (which is the socio-political climate of gender relations we see today).

'IT WAS THE PATRIARCHY'S FAULT NOOO'

go back to reddit

it is basic blackpill that hypergamy is foid nature, and 'men of the past' had to 'oppress' them in order to keep it in check. have your friends on IT not explained this to you

 

[userrrr]

IDK bro your perception doesn't really do anyhing. Women are still toys for chads and torture device for inkwells

 

[SociallyStupid]

Anything outside of that is abnormal, just like homosexuality. Only gays see women as more than man's basic needs.

I really don't like when people put in everything they dislike as "gay". IMHO the only thing which is gay is if you are attracted to the same sex, no other behaviour, even if abnormal, is gay.

Nature made women only to complement men and satisfy their desires

Complement men --> probably, but it does mean that both men and women have roles which complement each other, so in that sense men are "supposed" to help women where they can and women are "supposed" to help men where they can. This is an arguments against the forced equality of outcome (e.g. "we need 50% women in Job X"), but not even an argument against equality of opportunities.

Satisfy their desires --> not sure, why would nature care about the desire of men except for anything covered by the point above?

Lastly, I don't even like "Nature made XYZ" - nature has no intent, things just happen to be a way because it worked. You can say "Due to nature, women are often more suitable for XYZ", but that doesn't mean that they have to do exactly that. We live in different societies now, the talents needed as hunter-gatherers are not the same as we need now, so even if there was some role where men/women would have been perfect back then this role doesn't exist any more and I quite like the wealth we currently have, so don't want to go back to it.

Don't get me wrong, I wish that I could just have women satisfy my desires and that's it, but I am under no illusion that this is just a selfish wish and nothing I can back up with a consistent ideology.

 

[copemaxx9002]

They're a support class, alright. But they need to be respected. And I'm not just saying that to be contrarian here. What do you think caused feminism in the first place? If God exists, he made women to be our companions. If we treat our companions poorly (as men of the past did) we shouldn't surprised when they lash back at us (which is the socio-political climate of gender relations we see today).

Kill yourself

 

[aswellfella]

Kill yourself

I get you're upset. All I'm saying is the current first world gender-based conflict we find ourselves in has its roots in tribalism.

 

[aswellfella]

'IT WAS THE PATRIARCHY'S FAULT NOOO'

go back to reddit

it is basic blackpill that hypergamy is foid nature, and 'men of the past' had to 'oppress' them in order to keep it in check. have your friends on IT not explained this to you

Not saying this.

Just saying that I see this as a tribal conflict, and maybe it could stop for future generations of incels if Chads were nicer to their foids, that's all. Because people are very tribal and have a hard time separating a pump&dump Chad from the rest of men.

 

[Thaway]

Agree but sometimes i just want a girl to brush my hair and tell me everything will be alright which is mad gay but still i want to feel the warmth of a woman sometimes maybe not as gay as i explained it but you get me

That's some low T shit right there.

 

[faded]

If you're a heterosexual man, you can look at women as objects. Whether for sex, housework or reproduction. Anything other than that is homosexual. Nature made women only to complement men and satisfy their desires. Anything outside of that is abnormal, just like homosexuality. Only gays see women as more than man's basic needs.

Foids are meat/cum holes for Chad that’s it

 

[copemaxx9002]

I get you're upset. All I'm saying is the current first world gender-based conflict we find ourselves in has its roots in tribalism.

It has its roots in giving women rights like utter retards.

 

[copemaxx9002]

Are you from fucking reddit.

 

[ColdBoy]

Women deserve to face violence for being stuck up, worthless, entitled hypocrites.

 

[NeverEvenBegan]

Women are dumb pieces of meat whose sole purpose is to get creampied by men and birth their children.

 

[Limitcel]

They are human too
The female brain is not very different from the male brain
The difference is more in Fisherian Runaway, women being the select gender will have more sexual and loving success
People who tend to be successful in these areas of life tend to have a less critical view of the world, they never need to care
That's why in our view they may appear to be emptier beings but they have the same potential they just don't need to think about anything because their life doesn't require it.

"After all, the fields are not as green for those who are not loved as for those who are" -Fernando Pessoa

 

[Left4DeadKoala]

Agree but sometimes i just want a girl to brush my hair and tell me everything will be alright which is mad gay but still i want to feel the warmth of a woman sometimes maybe not as gay as i explained it but you get me

I don't think that's gay imo.

 

[Kaichee]

but sometimes i mad gay sometimes maybe not as gay as i explained

 

[InsidiousKoala]

foids aren't metaphysical, of course they are objects, they take up space and have mass.

 

[yeetbender.koala]

They're a support class, alright. But they need to be respected. And I'm not just saying that to be contrarian here. What do you think caused feminism in the first place? If God exists, he made women to be our companions. If we treat our companions poorly (as men of the past did) we shouldn't surprised when they lash back at us (which is the socio-political climate of gender relations we see today).

Foids will not stop hating us, if patriarchy wasn't established and they had rights from the start do you really think they would fuck you? You think teenage stacy has the blood memory of sharia law or something, women will spit on you and suck bbc on video to send to you, and have you be sexless incel and mock you and use you for your resources if you cuck yourself and be friendly jfl, stop hating yourself and embrace misogyny.

 

[waterbottle]

If you're a heterosexual man, you can look at women as objects. Whether for sex, housework or reproduction. Anything other than that is homosexual. Nature made women only to complement men and satisfy their desires. Anything outside of that is abnormal, just like homosexuality. Only gays see women as more than man's basic needs.

Agreed, but some human desires you think of as“homosexual” can be human nature. For instance, yearning for small things like gifts is arguably human nature.

 

[curryboy420]

Whomen are like soft meat like a chicken drumstick or lamb chop to eat up schllloorrp

 

[skankhunt69]

we al

If you're a heterosexual man, you can look at women as objects. Whether for sex, housework or reproduction. Anything other than that is homosexual. Nature made women only to complement men and satisfy their desires. Anything outside of that is abnormal, just like homosexuality. Only gays see women as more than man's basic needs.

we all share the same rights and wrongs. most women are deeply programmed, but you are extremely programmed. i hope you are trolling

 

[Adolf Kitler]

Based

 

[yeetbender.koala]

They're a support class, alright. But they need to be respected. And I'm not just saying that to be contrarian here. What do you think caused feminism in the first place? If God exists, he made women to be our companions. If we treat our companions poorly (as men of the past did) we shouldn't surprised when they lash back at us (which is the socio-political climate of gender relations we see today).

kill yourself