News Not a single intelligent opposer of the blackpill in sight

[nirvana]

My identity is not attached to the blackpill, which means I'm open to new ideas on the condition that they are coherent and verifiable. However, there seems to be no smart opponent of the blackpill out there. They are certainly not hiding on Reddit nor can they be found on YouTube—as a case in point, I spent days performing research on YouTube to try and find some meaningful content disproving the blackpill. It was mostly anecdotal evidence from redpill coaches selling their self-improvement courses to desperate young men.

I have nothing to lose in case the blackpill is disproven. In fact, I would win in such a scenario. But no matter how much time I spend reading the arguments of opponents, I find nothing convincing. The scientific literature on the blackpill is as terrifying to me as the literature on IQ is. There's no counterargument; just cold, hard data.

I'm still waiting for the brilliant rebuttals from the people who think they know better than us. I'm willing to read their studies and analyze the evidence. Yet, there seems to be no way back: the blackpill is the truth.

 

[INCELIBATE12]

the blackpill is the truth.

yeah in a sense that it make us see the reality

 

[Erenincel]

Blackpill was based on scientific research and statistics, and if they are true, then blackpill is also true. So far I haven't found anyone who would question the research, and there are only more and more of them.

 

[The Death Devil]

Blackpill was based on scientific research and statistics, and if they are true, then blackpill is also true. So far I haven't found anyone who would question the research, and there are only more and more of them.

Truthfully, it's rather jarring that it even has to be proven through statistics and actual research. I was thinking about this the other day, but it's kind of astonishing that people fight back so much against the idea that 'women are exclusively attracted to attractive men.' The very statement itself is rooted in reason—why exactly would they be attracted to unattractive guys? It's like insisting that an airplane can actually act as a submarine, the logic itself makes no sense.

Even then, Occam's Razor would suggest that the explanation with the least amount of unknown variables is the one that is most likely to be correct. It's way easier to say "looks are what dictate how attractive a guy is" instead of going through the hysterical mental gymnastics that normroaches go through to explain how attraction is somehow this super complex and abstract thing.

 

[Erenincel]

Truthfully, it's rather jarring that it even has to be proven through statistics and actual research. I was thinking about this the other day, but it's kind of astonishing that people fight back so much against the idea that 'women are exclusively attracted to attractive men.' The very statement itself is rooted in reason—why exactly would they be attracted to unattractive guys? It's like insisting that an airplane can actually act as a submarine, the logic itself makes no sense.

Believe me, even the most obvious thing needs to be proven. Especially since we humans have a tendency to think that obvious nonsense can seem obvious to us. What you're writing about proves that people don't use logic to arrive at the truth, but to defend their own beliefs. That's how the human brain rationalizes its own views.I'll explain how this works with an example. One UFO sect believed the world was ending and aliens would come to save them. They gathered in one place and waited. When the UFO didn't arrive at the appointed time, you know how people reacted? They began to believe even more and began to think they had saved the world from the Apocalypse.