https://****************/Scientific_Anti-Blackpill
Funny how they only cite a single study for each category yeah sounds highly convincing
Funny how they only cite a single study for each category yeah sounds highly convincing
N
Those low IQ cucks would never defeat my heightpill megathread
If they even try then they would look like a liberal art students denying international system of units but trying to prove that imperial units more scientifically accurate.
If they even try then they would look like a liberal art students denying international system of units but trying to prove that imperial units more scientifically accurate.
Last edited:
L
Literally all their points presume that one's negative personality is causal and not symptomatic. Not only do their studies not disprove the Blackpill, the arguement can be made that they prove it.
The entire page is a bad meme
Women have been less promiscuous since the sexual revolution
Edit
Blackpillers often assert a false narrative that women are becoming not only more promiscuous, but are very promiscuous compared to prior generations.
According to a study by Nicholas H. Wolfinger for the Institute of Family Studies, young men and young men women are having less overall sexual partners than Boomers and Gen X did at their age. In other words, both women and men have been less promiscuous over time. In order to look at this trend in detail, Nicholas analyzed promiscuity in relation to educational status and found that non-college educated women in particular have seen a steady decline in promiscuity since the 1970s.
The only subgroup of women he found being particularly more promiscuous over time were the already promiscuous top 5% of women, in other words, the types of women blackpillers focus on on Tinder apps.
This finding was confirmed by secondary sources as well.[7]
However, it is true that younger women are acting more slutty, despite not necessarily being so in the strict sense.
References:
Nicholas H. Wolfinger Promiscuous America: Smart, Secular, and Somewhat Less Happy
Women have been less promiscuous since the sexual revolution
Edit
Blackpillers often assert a false narrative that women are becoming not only more promiscuous, but are very promiscuous compared to prior generations.
According to a study by Nicholas H. Wolfinger for the Institute of Family Studies, young men and young men women are having less overall sexual partners than Boomers and Gen X did at their age. In other words, both women and men have been less promiscuous over time. In order to look at this trend in detail, Nicholas analyzed promiscuity in relation to educational status and found that non-college educated women in particular have seen a steady decline in promiscuity since the 1970s.
The only subgroup of women he found being particularly more promiscuous over time were the already promiscuous top 5% of women, in other words, the types of women blackpillers focus on on Tinder apps.
This finding was confirmed by secondary sources as well.[7]
However, it is true that younger women are acting more slutty, despite not necessarily being so in the strict sense.
References:
Nicholas H. Wolfinger Promiscuous America: Smart, Secular, and Somewhat Less Happy
Normies just can't face harsh facts of life and would rather deny everything
No more face copers!
Face
Most of the time women prefer average, not super manly faces
Researchers Penton-Voak Ph.D. and Perrett Ph.D. conducted a study in which they manipulated computer generated composite faces of men and showed them to women. They adjusted for sexual dimorphism, creating faces with big defined jaws, and ones with more feminine jaws. Turned out the ones that were most attractive to women were not the most manly to women not ovulating.
The researchers found that when women were not ovulating, they preferred average male faces. And given your average and admirable local slut is on birth control, that means that she too will prefer men with average faces, not super masculine faces.
References:
Penton-Voak I.S. Ph.D., Perrett D.I Ph.D. Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: Further evidence
Face
Most of the time women prefer average, not super manly faces
Researchers Penton-Voak Ph.D. and Perrett Ph.D. conducted a study in which they manipulated computer generated composite faces of men and showed them to women. They adjusted for sexual dimorphism, creating faces with big defined jaws, and ones with more feminine jaws. Turned out the ones that were most attractive to women were not the most manly to women not ovulating.
The researchers found that when women were not ovulating, they preferred average male faces. And given your average and admirable local slut is on birth control, that means that she too will prefer men with average faces, not super masculine faces.
References:
Penton-Voak I.S. Ph.D., Perrett D.I Ph.D. Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: Further evidence
L
They're also more likely to believe in a just world. This is also why the arguement that nobody owes you sex is stupid.
L
"When not ovulating". Meaning that when they're about to get pregnant they cheat on the beta husbands with an alpha Chads and raise their children with betas' resources.
Hypergamy is a myth y'all
The sexual revolution caused women to marry more within their social class
Proponents often justify a bunk theory that the sexual revolution caused incels by stating the sexual revolution has caused women to marry above their social class more than before the sexual revolution. This is provably false.
For example, according to a study by the Bonn Institute for the Study of Labor, since the 1960s, people have generally married more, not less, within their class, as measured by education level.
This does not mean women aren't hypergamous, it also does not mean that hypergamy doesn't cause inceldom, but it does mean that the sexual revolution contributed less to hypergamy than blackpillers think. It is likely hypergamy was always a problem for incels, and the sexual revolution is not to blame for hypergamy existing. It is possible that the sexual revolution increased inceldom for those over 30 due to women marrying less, however, women often choose not to marry for reasons other than pool of available men. The onus is on blackpillers to prove that the sexual revolution increased female hypergamy, due to the burden of proof.
References:
Jeremy Greenwood, Nezih Guner, Georgi Kocharkov, Cezar Santos. 2014. Marry Your Like: Assortative Mating and Income Inequality
Bonn Institute for the Study of Labor, Full Study
The sexual revolution caused women to marry more within their social class
Proponents often justify a bunk theory that the sexual revolution caused incels by stating the sexual revolution has caused women to marry above their social class more than before the sexual revolution. This is provably false.
For example, according to a study by the Bonn Institute for the Study of Labor, since the 1960s, people have generally married more, not less, within their class, as measured by education level.
This does not mean women aren't hypergamous, it also does not mean that hypergamy doesn't cause inceldom, but it does mean that the sexual revolution contributed less to hypergamy than blackpillers think. It is likely hypergamy was always a problem for incels, and the sexual revolution is not to blame for hypergamy existing. It is possible that the sexual revolution increased inceldom for those over 30 due to women marrying less, however, women often choose not to marry for reasons other than pool of available men. The onus is on blackpillers to prove that the sexual revolution increased female hypergamy, due to the burden of proof.
References:
Jeremy Greenwood, Nezih Guner, Georgi Kocharkov, Cezar Santos. 2014. Marry Your Like: Assortative Mating and Income Inequality
Bonn Institute for the Study of Labor, Full Study
Lol they thought they did something there
I
the blackpill is undefeated
L
I
ctrl f "height" no match, normies won't even attempt to debunk the heightpillhttps://****************/Scientific_Anti-Blackpill
Funny how they only cite a single study for each category yeah sounds highly convincing
Arent u a 6'1 chink irl
The sources are a bunch of bloggers citing surveys and calling it 'data analysis' what a joke.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
