L
Lebensmüder
Soon to be deleted account
★★★
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2018
- Posts
- 5,202
Discussions with normtards are tiresome af. When you say that the average woman is weaker than the average male they come up with female wrestlers and say that they could beat you up for saying such a thing, when you say something about racial differences in the IQ they come up with scientists belonging to minority groups or want you to post your own IQ and then they think that they are so smart and that they have bested you in the argument.
They didn't prove anything. IQ/strength/most other values have a normal distribution, just because a certain group has higher scores on average this doesn't mean that everyone belonging to this group must have greater scores than every single individual in the other group, we are not dealing with math where one single exception completely destroys a rule/sentiment. Nobody ever claimed that exceptions didn't exist and few things have indeed never happened on the face of the earth.
"Hurr durr, the best % of that group beats the worst % of the other group, therefore the other group is not on average better than the other group, me very smart, me won!" - literally their arguments. Again exceptions exist, but if you put the top x % of females and the top x % of males against each other in a fight solely based on physical strength I would certainly bet my money on the males.
Furthermore, the ad hominem "arguments" are always laughable: Even if the speaker was a pathetic specimen of his respective group it wouldn't make his words suddenly untrue, the water doesn't suddenly become dry just because a fool or evil person said that it was wet. The actual arguments remain unaddressed. The IQ/physical strength of the speaker is absolutely irrelevant for the truth in their words.
They didn't prove anything. IQ/strength/most other values have a normal distribution, just because a certain group has higher scores on average this doesn't mean that everyone belonging to this group must have greater scores than every single individual in the other group, we are not dealing with math where one single exception completely destroys a rule/sentiment. Nobody ever claimed that exceptions didn't exist and few things have indeed never happened on the face of the earth.
"Hurr durr, the best % of that group beats the worst % of the other group, therefore the other group is not on average better than the other group, me very smart, me won!" - literally their arguments. Again exceptions exist, but if you put the top x % of females and the top x % of males against each other in a fight solely based on physical strength I would certainly bet my money on the males.
Furthermore, the ad hominem "arguments" are always laughable: Even if the speaker was a pathetic specimen of his respective group it wouldn't make his words suddenly untrue, the water doesn't suddenly become dry just because a fool or evil person said that it was wet. The actual arguments remain unaddressed. The IQ/physical strength of the speaker is absolutely irrelevant for the truth in their words.
Last edited: