a female minor found a recording device inside a bathroom of Merrill's residence
Who the fuck is this female minor inside his bathroom? A niece? Daughter?
She also alleged that Merill was "holding his phone in a position by his waist while manipulating the phone as if he was photographing and/or filming young girls who were walking in front of him."
His waist would be higher than waist level of any young girls in front of him.
If they imply he's snapping up their skirts to get panty shots he'd need to hold the phone lower than "waist" level.
They probably mean he had his hands at his side (pro tip - this means your ELBOW is at "waist" level) with his hand at KNEE level.
When the Vermont State Police examined Merill's device, in addition to the bathroom recordings
Couldn't bathroom recordings simply be for home security because you suspect foids are stealing your toothpaste or doing drugs in there?
they also found that he had taken images from minors' social media profiles and cropped their faces onto adult pornographic actors
IDGAF that shouldn't be illegal, I'd post that shit right now if the mods wouldn't flip out about it.
@Fat Link can I find some 17yo celebrity and paste her face onto body of some 80yo granny porn star for argument's sake?
If it makes you feel better I could even shoop female 17yo celebrity onto body of a naked man. This would not be for homosexual purposes but to show how absurd such a rule is.
I can't say I understand the fetish but there is no fucking way it should be illegal to post attractive and legal adult bodies with the faces of children pasted on them.
That is a very slippery slope that would interfere with legitimate artistic expression.
For example (and I will pic a clothed erotic pic of a female, not a nude one, so we don't risk CP laws) what if I wanted to post this to express my belief that busty white stacys have the mental capacity of baby nigger males?
Something like this would be CP if the caucasoid foid was topless or showing her pussy?
That's fucking ridiculous, that is clearly not the intention of anti-CP laws which is to prevent circulation of actual photographs of children being genitally abused, as in their own genitalia. Not BS like "you can't show the face of a child next to porn".
If you had cucked laws like that you couldn't show shit like degenerate moms flashing tits on onlyfans while their neglected kids are in the background. Being able to show that is essential.
I expect the laws were secretly propagated by jews so we couldn't show videos of them molesting baby boy penises. If we could actually circulate photos of the rabbis putting the baby penises into their mouths we would've shut them down decades ago, but because there's no photos to broadcast their degenerate pedophilic molestation of newborns the normies can remain in denial about the jewish nepio-sadists.
