D
Deleted member 18515
.
-
- Joined
- May 13, 2019
- Posts
- 5,513
This is an interesting topic that has chosen some discussions about here.
Let me give you some examples:
I claim on a sea worm first due to witness observations and pictures / film.
You answer: It is not possible.
I answer: prove its not real.
You answer: The burden of proof is on it as the existing existence, I can't prove it before?
I answer: But is it possible to drain the lake from water? If you can't find it then you have proved your stand?
You can also gather 3 million normal fags to walk hand-in-hand through nepals wilderness and prove its not real.
It's just semantics mixed with bad imagination and laziness to hide behind these phrases of burden of proof.
Let me give you some examples:
I claim on a sea worm first due to witness observations and pictures / film.
You answer: It is not possible.
I answer: prove its not real.
You answer: The burden of proof is on it as the existing existence, I can't prove it before?
I answer: But is it possible to drain the lake from water? If you can't find it then you have proved your stand?
You can also gather 3 million normal fags to walk hand-in-hand through nepals wilderness and prove its not real.
It's just semantics mixed with bad imagination and laziness to hide behind these phrases of burden of proof.