Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Nordics love appropriating Mediterranean culture as their own. Civilization came from med people not Nordic Niggers even Hitler admits it. J2 supreme

that's not what I'm talking about retard. I'm not talking about achievements but genetic makeup. And you keep mentioning how "close" your nation of ahmeds are to Europeans when there's a chart literally proving otherwise that you keep ignoring.
It's insane how not a single Greek, Italian, or Spainiard will ever make the claims you're making, they almost exclusively come from Arab larpers such as yourself. This should be enough proof to know that you're just engaging in WE WUZZING no different than niggers who think they're Ancient Egyptians.
Every ethinic is We wuzzers who always try to claim the achievements of European races and other advanced civilization
 
My main point is about achievements not genetic makeup meds are related to each other through ANF.
Greeks were heavily inspired by Mesopotamia and Ancient Egypt.
And Romans were inspired by Greeks
My point is the thread of civilization started from Mesopotamia while wiggers claim it was Europeans are super civilized as if most of it isn't founded on Mesopotamian innovations


I am not wuzzing civilization was founded in Mesopotamia not Greece proving my point
This is common knowledge look it up



Arabs are from the south.
I am Levantine different Haplogroups.
@DarkStar see this retards
 
Ex Christian
Half Phoenicians Half South Aramean
Phoenicians/Arameans are Semitic group which has nothing to common with Meds who are Indo European having thier genetic ancestral roots in Steppe and European Hunter Gatherers people
 
You are not med and never ever will be med. You are a Brown sandnigger
Weird being called brown again since I am pale as snow
just call me Semite sandnigger pls
 
Phoenicians/Arameans are Semitic group which has nothing to common with Meds who are Indo European having thier genetic ancestral roots in Steppe and European Hunter Gatherers people
Again we already finished this discussion Anatolian Neolithic farmers are a large percentage of Med peoples genetics but they are closer to Europeans than Semites.
 
Every ethinic is We wuzzers who always try to claim the achievements of European races and other advanced civilization
Leave it to a curry to gobble up white cock
 
hes too invested in race tbh. I can understand if I were white I would be an SFcel like him too but theres more to life than race, and the blackpill doesnt have to support racial determinism. but he is higher iq compared to other SFcels. atleast he doesnt reply with "stfu shitskin" and other low effort bait like @ U @user and other SFcels did
@DarkStar is more than an a white nat/SFcel.He is one of the gifted intelligent high iq race realist. He intellectual level is at higher level
 
@DarkStar is more than an a white nat/SFcel.He is one of the gifted intelligent high iq race realist. He intellectual level is at higher level
ok bro hop off his dick :feelsseriously:
 
Holy shit replies mogs me
 
yesterday and today I took two iq tests. one said I got 100 another said it was 124. I cant tell which one is real but its safe to say I'm not low iq.
Online are poor, like I said actual IRL ones administered a way tell the story
and also I'm not as low inhib and NT compared to other curries.
I can believe that, most here aren't
the only thing I would change about my genes is my extreme non-NTness as I'm giga socially awkward irl
I disagree, even if you look something to truly be it you have to bear the genetics of it, this is why a lot of RW people talk of "blood" a lot which this is a metaphor for
You are not med and never ever will be med. You are a Brown sandnigger
I'm sick of ethnics thinking they are at liberty to define White

Only on this garbage, shithole forum is a North Italian or Frenchman or Slav or even any dark haired European "non-white" but a fucking Albino curry is
white nats say this all the time when it's really just they're being told they're not allowed to subjugate other races.
I'm really confused, I don't see these "WN" you speak of who think we have the right to subjugate others at all
theres many whites that say all the time how they're proud of being irish, italian, etc but if you say you're proud of being white thats different
And how is that bad? All of these groups are White & share genetics, culture, history

What you're doing is called a "deconstruction of Whiteness"

What is so wrong with Whites being aware of their collective identity & wanting to preserve it? I just don't see how this is an issue that Whites acknowledge we are a race. This is where I have an issue, since you seem to dislike the idea of White's acknowledging a collective identity, since right now we're all facing demographic replacement issues

All we're saying, is that we are a race, we have contributed a lot(yes we did fuck stuff up also) and deserve our own homelands.
hes too invested in race tbh. I can understand if I were white I would be an SFcel like him too
So you admit we at least have a point?
but theres more to life than race,
Very disingenuous considering the threads I've put in ID & elsewhere

I know there is more to life than it, but I'm just trying to discern the fact that unlike what the mainstream tells us,
and the blackpill doesnt have to support racial determinism
I'd argue it does, though it's not intended to make any race seem "superior" since you could argue having a lower IQ is better in some cases, since research shows lower-IQ people have more sex & also generally can cope better.

Though ofc yes, I admit I do focus on it too much & should focus on other stuff like the NTpill.

The reason I believe in racial realism & determinism, is because we apply this logic & belief to virtually everything -ie your genes determine your life more or less- and apply it to stuff such as phenotypes & then somehow it doesn't apply to behavior? Despite the fact certain SNPs/alleles vary amongst populations, even within races.
. but he is higher iq compared to other SFcels.
Thank you, I at least appreciate this
atleast he doesnt reply with "stfu shitskin" and other low effort bait like @user and other SFcels did
Well tbf you guys do treat us kinda unfairly imo
 
Last edited:
yep same, race used to be my interest by high degree
Because as I said, it's not just looks it can relate to your behavior also

It's part of biology imo
I know brotha
I'm just sick of somehow me being against immigration, diversity, and also thinking Whites as a race have contributed to humanity & have positive qualities deserve to go on
 
@DarkStar is more than an a white nat/SFcel.He is one of the gifted intelligent high iq race realist. He intellectual level is at higher level
:feelsYall::feelsYall:
ok bro hop off his dick :feelsseriously:
Pajeet what's ur prblm with appreciating someone
Yeah exactly, what's wrong with just spreading positivity- thought this was a mutually supportive community? :waitwhat::waitwhat::waitwhat:

And he even said he likes other stuff I talk about
Leave it to a curry to gobble up white cock
And leave it to a Sand to try & claim White history & then try to pull some "we wuz" shit & invalidate the achievements of Romans & Greeks
 
fuck off sand
Based

It's always Sandshits, Curroids, and Spicshits who make threads like this

All three of which are some of the most insufferable groups I've had the misfortune of interacting with online
 
Based

It's always Sandshits, Curroids, and Spicshits who make threads like this

All three of which are some of the most insufferable groups I've had the misfortune of interacting with online
nigga even I as a curry has somewhat evidences that I can twist and make myself as ' superior ' here but what in the actual fucking cope is this.
Sand guys are just crazy, it's been centuries since they have become irrelevant in world politics, science or literally anything yet they wanna claim their superiority.
Nigger you're the closest to a nigger, just accept the usual hierarchy and shut the fuck up
 
nigga even I as a curry has somewhat evidences that I can twist and make myself as ' superior ' here but what in the actual fucking cope is this.
Sand guys are just crazy, it's been centuries since they have become irrelevant in world politics, science or literally anything yet they wanna claim their superiority.
Nigger you're the closest to a nigger, just accept the usual hierarchy and shut the fuck up
I'm not sand you braindead curroid
 
j2 haplogroup is the most based
I don't consider myself white anymore but a part of the Superior Med Race.
Fellow meds rise up.

ituvwiq9jkr81.jpg

Himmler had to go to the ends of the Earth and say we wuz Chinkoids and Curries nepalese and sheet while Meds have ancient history buried in the earth every step they take.
Stormfrontcels will be very upset about this

If only they could read
 
Online are poor, like I said actual IRL ones administered a way tell the story
true, but I still doubt my iq is lower than 100. most peoples iq falls within that range
I disagree, even if you look something to truly be it you have to bear the genetics of it, this is why a lot of RW people talk of "blood" a lot which this is a metaphor for
I guess thats true
I'm sick of ethnics thinking they are at liberty to define White

Only on this garbage, shithole forum is a North Italian or Frenchman or Slav or even any dark haired European "non-white" but a fucking Albino curry is
meh I would say you can just ignore those ethnics. alot of them are just baiting because they're bored. ill admit sometimes Im guilty of that as well
I'm really confused, I don't see these "WN" you speak of who think we have the right to subjugate others at all
no but contextually speaking 99% of the time those that say they're proud of being white also accompany it with hatred against non-whites. like for example saying you're proud of your white heritage and that those without it should go back to their country, or saying it while carrying an apartheid flag. it's more about the context and it's always said in the context of hating non-whites, instilling a whites vs non-whites mindset rather than actual self-pride
And how is that bad? All of these groups are White & share genetics, culture, history

What you're doing is called a "deconstruction of Whiteness"

What is so wrong with Whites being aware of their collective identity & wanting to preserve it? I just don't see how this is an issue that Whites acknowledge we are a race. This is where I have an issue, since you seem to dislike the idea of White's acknowledging a collective identity, since right now we're all facing demographic replacement issues

All we're saying, is that we are a race, we have contributed a lot(yes we did fuck stuff up also) and deserve our own homelands.
ok imagine someone saying they're proud of being japanese and foreigners dont belong here vs they're proud of being yellow and non-yellow people dont belong here. which one would make more sense to you? yellow people aren't a tribe. japanese, koreans, and chinese are, but not yellows.

and whites only became collective and created this pseudo-tribe once non-white immigrants were introduced to them. then all of a sudden the catholic irish vs slavs vs meds vs anglo-saxons war ended because they saw non-whites as the bigger threat. and you argue like zionists do. nobodys denying your right to a homeland. you're just being denied the ability to decide who should be allowed to live in your land and who shouldn't based on genes. no other country besides kikeland does it. considering that western white countries hoarded all the wealth and tech and third world countries are prevented from progress due to neoliberal american imperialism, denying them the right to a better quality life is immoral at that point. if every country was 1st world and wealth/power was equally spread out, then youd have a point. but thats not the case and you know it
So you admit we at least have a point?
no. Im just being honest and saying that Im selfish and if I were white, I wouldnt care about my morals and support whatever policies would benefit me at the moment. just like how if I were a woman, I would support radical feminism or if I were black, I would support BLM
Very disingenuous considering the threads I've put in ID & elsewhere

I know there is more to life than it, but I'm just trying to discern the fact that unlike what the mainstream tells us,
ok it just feels like you're feeling obligated to protect whites on here and take every trollish insult to whites on a personal level when you dont have to and it doesnt affect you
research shows lower-IQ people have more sex & also generally can cope better.
generally because low-iq people tend to also be low inhib and dark triad, but they're low iq isn't the main reason and alot of incels here are low-iq as well
Though ofc yes, I admit I do focus on it too much & should focus on other stuff like the NTpill.
your non-race related threads are high quality though
The reason I believe in racial realism & determinism, is because we apply this logic & belief to virtually everything -ie your genes determine your life more or less- and apply it to stuff such as phenotypes & then somehow it doesn't apply to behavior? Despite the fact certain SNPs/alleles vary amongst populations, even within races.
I do think race affects behavior to an extent, but that it can be tamed. I am aware that blacks have higher T and that does contribute towards their low inhib and violent behavior, but they shouldnt be defined by their genes is my point and they can still control themselves
Well tbf you guys do treat us kinda unfairly imo
I admittedly bait sometimes but I avoid throwing ad hominens to not sound like a smug redditor. and there are alot of ethnics here that like baiting whites, like that ethniccel with the dog pfp. dont know what grudge he has with whitecels here and his posts come off as low iq. and logic55 at first I found his points valid but nowadays his posts are all racebait and its obvious. I dont approve those people btw
 
Yeah exactly, what's wrong with just spreading positivity- thought this was a mutually supportive community? :waitwhat::waitwhat::waitwhat:

And he even said he likes other stuff I talk about
nothing wrong. he just comes off as one of those typical curries that try to get approval from whites. sorry I'm just so used to interacting with those types of curries on here I just assumed hes one of those
 
:feelsYall::feelsYall:


Yeah exactly, what's wrong with just spreading positivity- thought this was a mutually supportive community? :waitwhat::waitwhat::waitwhat:

And he even said he likes other stuff I talk about

And leave it to a Sand to try & claim White history & then try to pull some "we wuz" shit & invalidate the achievements of Romans & Greeks
I admit I was wrong about Romans and Greeks being closer to Semites and whatever but the thread was to highlight how much whites hate sandniggers even though they complete ignore how important semitic civilization was for the world and heavily influenced western civ.

I just hate the sandnigger hate here and can't stand it as if the middle east is all nomads with no culture or significant history.

I was looking to meet some other med people on this thread and discuss the history of the place so we can feel superior even though we are all basement dwelling incels with nothing to look forward too except our deaths and live vicariously in the past

but it became a race bait thread which was not my intention

My apologies

Again I am proud of my Semitic history don't put words in my mouth not trying to we wuzz about Europeans I was mistaken about our relations to Eastern euros and that is it.

Not invalidation Roman and Greek achievements but the contrary this thread was supposed to highlight achievements from Semites that Greeks and Romans heavily appreciated and helped them out a lot. Many Greeks and Romans admired, learned and were inspired by semitic civilization Egypt Babylon etc.
Edit: Link:
 
Last edited:
thread is schizo
Yea I got a some info wrong and learned a few new things but my intention was to highlight sandnigger achievements in history because there is too much sandnigger hate here and downplaying cultural scientific achievement for too long
 
Yea I got a some info wrong and learned a few new things but my intention was to highlight sandnigger achievements in history because there is too much sandnigger hate here and downplaying cultural scientific achievement for too long
sandniggers didn't do shit
 
Look dude while there are internal differences between white people, all of them pale in comparison to the differences between whites (Caucasoid) and oteh races.
Same goes for other races. While there are internal differences between people of the oriental (mongoloid) race, such as chinese/vietnamese/japanese/korean/whatever, they have much mor ein common than with other races
While there are internal differences betwen people of the black (negroid) race, they are closer to each othe rthan they are to different races.

As such I find the whole meds vs nords vs dinarids vs levantines vs whatever to be overall detrimental to caucasians (whites) as a whole, only dividing us and benefitting the globalists.
 
But there is some truth to that. Why do poles or slavs think they were the inventors of civilization? SFcels that call everyone shitskin when they find about about Arthur de Gobineau :feelswhere:
 
I ain't reading this fucking thread. Why are you tagging me? I wasn't gonna reply until you tagged me.
Lol you spam this forum with rage bait all the time and you are always so angry.
 
Look dude while there are internal differences between white people, all of them pale in comparison to the differences between whites (Caucasoid) and oteh races.
Same goes for other races. While there are internal differences between people of the oriental (mongoloid) race, such as chinese/vietnamese/japanese/korean/whatever, they have much mor ein common than with other races
While there are internal differences betwen people of the black (negroid) race, they are closer to each othe rthan they are to different races.

As such I find the whole meds vs nords vs dinarids vs slavs vs whatever to be overall detrimental to caucasians (whites) as a whole, only dividing us and benefitting the globalists.
This:yes::yes::yes:

22yourenotwhite22threads

nothing wrong. he just comes off as one of those typical curries that try to get approval from whites. sorry I'm just so used to interacting with those types of curries on here I just assumed hes one of those
That applies to curry normies who shit on their own race but suck-up to Whites irl

If a Currycel praises a Whitecel for what he's done so what? Isn't this a supportive place? :waitwhat:
true, but I still doubt my iq is lower than 100. most peoples iq falls within that range
depends on their ethnicity & race*
I guess thats true
Exactly, race isn't just "muh skin tone" like normies say, it has a lot to do with your genetics & also phenotype
meh I would say you can just ignore those ethnics. alot of them are just baiting because they're bored. ill admit sometimes Im guilty of that as well
It's annoying because usually groups define themselves often

I also see it as them "white worshiping" since they will shit on Irish, Italians, Iberians, Slavs, and even the French at times but then praise Anglos, Germanics, etc.
no but contextually speaking 99% of the time those that say they're proud of being white also accompany it with hatred against non-whites.
Define the context of "hatred" here
like for example saying you're proud of your white heritage and that those without it should go back to their country,
I don't see this as "hatred" it's more of just wanting your country to be homogenous

"hatred" would be saying you're proud to be White & that all non-Whites deserve to be killed just 'cause & we should conquer the world(unless it's metaphor)
or saying it while carrying an apartheid flag.
Eh, I mean every regime is guilty of wrongdoing- I'd never fly the US flag for a variety of reasons & many of your ilk would albeit for some differing ones.

The current regime there also fucked up big time, since they confiscated land from Whites & then faced food issues
it's more about the context and it's always said in the context of hating non-whites, instilling a whites vs non-whites mindset rather than actual self-pride
I think "hatred" is seen differently here
ok imagine someone saying they're proud of being japanese and foreigners dont belong here vs they're proud of being yellow and non-yellow people dont belong here. which one would make more sense to you? yellow people aren't a tribe. japanese, koreans, and chinese are, but not yellows.
"yellow" would be a metaphor and is also incorrect usage, same for "white" since both are meaningless terms used to deconstruct race. "White" is just a skin-tone.

What we mean is native Europeans -people who had an ethnogenesis in Europe- should have a shared collective identity & a right to homogenous homelands. Ofc, ideally each country should remain its native population, but what we're also acknowledging is that a clear "White" or "European" race does exist, which science literally backs up & which many normies of our race are aware of to some degree.
and whites only became collective and created this pseudo-tribe
How is it a "pseudo tribe?"

This is where I get frustrated, since you then seem to acknowledge blacks, curries, etc. as a collective race, yet deny the validity of a "White race"when this is how we have chosen to define ourselves, and also considering that this is supported by modern science:

Europeans
GIfhB0tWcAARlpC
Main qimg ee37a94fee4cdea7e02e18eba67f4dd7 lq


As well as the fact that there's also this factor:

Blumenbach explored the biodiversity of humans mainly by comparing skull anatomy and skin color. His work included a description of sixty human crania (skulls) published originally in fascicules as Decas craniorum(Göttingen, 1790–1828). This was a founding work for other scientists in the field of craniometry. He established a five-part naming system in 1795 to describe what he called generis humani varietates quinae principes, species vero unica (five principal varieties of humankind, but one species). In his view, humans could be divided into varieties (only in his later work he adopted the term "races", which had been introduced by others) but he was aware that a clear separation was difficult:
Blumenbach's classification of the single human species into five varieties (later called "races") (1793/1795):


Here's also what the NSDAP says:
The text seems to categorize the European races in descending orders in the Nazi racial hierarchy: the Nordic (including the Phalic sub-race, a subgroup of the Nordic race), Mediterranean, Dinaric, Alpine, and East Baltic races.[5]

So based on genetics & shared phenotypes+anthropological measurements yes, a European/White race exists & is a concept.

The concept has been around for a long time, first as "Caucasoid" and then "White" or "European" or "Aryan" was refined as one
The term Caucasian as a racial category was introduced in the 1780s by members of the Göttingen school of history – notably Christoph Meiners in 1785 and Johann Friedrich Blumenbach in 1795https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasian_race#cite_note-GöttingenGargoyle-13[page needed]—it had originally referred in a narrow sense to the native inhabitants of the Caucasus region.[25]



once non-white immigrants were introduced to them. then all of a sudden the catholic irish vs slavs vs meds vs anglo-saxons war ended because they saw non-whites as the bigger threat.
Read this:

As even Prof. Roediger himself recognizes, naturalization laws throughout this period specified that citizenship was open to “free white persons,” and no one ever argued that “Guineas” and “Bohunks” were unqualified. Other races were. In 1922, the Supreme Court ruled that Japanese could not naturalize because they were not white. The next year, a subcontinental Indian came before the court, claiming he was “Caucasian,” and therefore eligible. In earlier cases, the court had sought expert testimony from anthropologists as to who was white, but in the Thind case, the justices ruled that it was simple common sense not to consider Indians white. New immigrants from Europe were unfailingly admitted to citizenship.

The census bureau during this period counted new immigrants the same way. It classified the first generation and their children as “foreign-born white,” but counted the third generation simply as white. This reflected both scholarly and popular assumptions. As a 1932 study by Donald Young called American Minority People noted of the new immigrant, it was “dimly realized that in a few generations he will be absorbed into the total white population.” Young went on to say that the “white immigrant [is] patently handicapped by foreign language and tradition” but the “Negro now is looked on as more of a biological problem.”
The prominent sociologist Henry Pratt Fairchild (1880–1956), whom the author calls “racist” for his views of non-whites, took a haughty but different view of the southern or central European: “If he proves himself a man and . . . acquires wealth and cleans himself up — very well, we might receive him in a generation or two. But at present he is far beneath us and the burden of proof rests with him.” Unlettered aliens would have to prove they could become American, and as Prof. Roediger notes, even the Italians found that if they renounced their foreign habits they were accepted. By 1920, scholars were generally predicting that European ethnics would assimilate. They were making no such predictions about blacks
and you argue like zionists do. nobodys denying your right to a homeland.
Many people do, in fact- including many here
you're just being denied the ability to decide who should be allowed to live in your land and who shouldn't based on genes.
Again, genes present a form of collective heritage how is it this hard to understand? There's even some genetic differences between European populations, which can be used as a marker for defining borders there even. For example, an Englishman is ofc somewhat genetically different in terms of measurement from let's say a German, so that can be differentiated.

As stated above, I also ideally want all White nations to be of their native stock or at least a very close one(ie, Irish people in Britain or North Italians with the French)
no other country besides kikeland does it.
Can you at least prove they do it? Afaik, for them it's more to do with being Jewish & yes that is genetic to some degree, but there's a big religious element

And also, how is all because they do it bad? This is a poor straw man youre making here, very disingenuous also since as proven, all of Europe & also North America+Australia are facing replacement
considering that western white countries hoarded all the wealth and tech and third world countries are prevented from progress due to neoliberal american imperialism, denying them the right to a better quality life is immoral at that point. if every country was 1st world and wealth/power was equally spread out, then youd have a point. but thats not the case and you know it
Can you at least cite something here? I've never denied that it does happen but you make it out to seem as if every White person is "in" on this plot to deny you guys, when I've explained these countries don't work in favor of us Whites or anyone who ins't a richfag

And how is it that China is catching up, as is a lot of Asia(not South Asia), and also a lot of MENA countries were well off before intervention? :waitwhat:
o. Im just being honest and saying that Im selfish
I hate to say this, but you admitting to being selfish is part of the reason things got how they did

Selfishness is a root cause of ills, and not just Inceldom but in general

As said before, I do agree with a lot of Socialist values- last time I checked selfishness is not one in an ideal socialist society. :waitwhat:
and if I were white, I wouldnt care about my morals and support whatever policies would benefit me at the moment.
You shouldn't just think in the moment, you should also think somewhat long-term as well & also reflect on the past to see what you can do, which should be the basis for morals imo, as well as acknowledging human nature.
just like how if I were a woman, I would support radical feminism
Can't argue here at all, foids have an insane in group loyalty
or if I were black, I would support BLM
Eh nah, I think I'd be better than that at least- it's funded by George Soros.
ok it just feels like you're feeling obligated to protect whites on here and take every trollish insult to whites on a personal level when you dont have to and it doesnt affect you
Yeah ok I do admit, I do overreact to stuff and/or take jokes the wrong way, but this is an issue I have as a whole with things in general.
generally because low-iq people tend to also be low inhib and dark triad, but they're low iq isn't the main reason and alot of incels here are low-iq as well
partially true, I was just stating how saying "x group is more intelligent than y group" isn't meant to be seen as supremacist since people can argue things from different perspectives

What I really believe is that races just have different ways of thinking if that makes sense, and IQ is just an indicator of this fact.
your non-race related threads are high quality though
Thank you, and you also cannot deny the fact that they don't get as much traction as many race threads do. I don't mean to sound conceited, but if people reacted to those ones better I'd ofc discuss race much less.
I do think race affects behavior to an extent, but that it can be tamed. I am aware that blacks have higher T and that does contribute towards their low inhib and violent behavior, but they shouldnt be defined by their genes is my point and they can still control themselves
Well, genetics determine a lot

This doesn't just apply to race, which is why I think you're confused here. I believe in genetic determinism for more or less everything in life to a degree. Personality? Yup, relates to genes. Focus & concentration? Related to genes. Athleticism? All in the genes ofc.

Now I do agree, they can be controlled or tamed in ways & gradually improved over time(selective breeding). However, I also think that due to differences manifesting in basic interactions with races, it is best for them to live separately, same goes along ethnic lines
I admittedly bait sometimes
It's hard to define, I consider bait as anything low-effort with the intent to cause an argument

I've also racebaited before myself, and a mod literally said once if they had to actually enforce it most users would end up banned/warned:feelshaha:
but I avoid throwing ad hominens to not sound like a smug redditor. and there are alot of ethnics here that like baiting whites, like that ethniccel with the dog pfp.
Aka all he has done on here for years

Ah, but users like me are the issue?:feelsseriously:
and logic55 at first I found his points valid but nowadays his posts are all racebait and its obvious. I dont approve those people btw
Well thank you for that at least- he also always resorts to tangents or repeating his initial thesis/premise(ie, genes don't matter for anything) just in a different way

He's literally a Neo-Liberal by his own admission:

Image 3


At least you ain't a Liberal. :feelsthink:
 
As well as the fact that there's also this factor:
Blumenbach explored the biodiversity of humans mainly by comparing skull anatomy and skin color. His work included a description of sixty human crania (skulls) published originally in fascicules as Decas craniorum(Göttingen, 1790–1828). This was a founding work for other scientists in the field of craniometry. He established a five-part naming system in 1795 to describe what he called generis humani varietates quinae principes, species vero unica (five principal varieties of humankind, but one species). In his view, humans could be divided into varieties (only in his later work he adopted the term "races", which had been introduced by others) but he was aware that a clear separation was difficult:
Blumenbach's classification of the single human species into five varieties (later called "races") (1793/1795):


I would add two more races to his classification, that of the indians (India like the size of Europe and has lots of internal variation, they aren't all homogenous), who aclearly aren't Mongoloid, and that of the Australian Aborigenes, who also probably have internal variation.
But otherwise its pretty much it.

Humanity is a species, there are different races that all make up the species, but are different from one another. And these races all have different ethnic groups, who are internally different to a greater or lesser degree to one another but still closer to their fellows than to different races.
 
Again I am proud of my Semitic history don't put words in my mouth not trying to we wuzz about Europeans I was mistaken about our relations to Eastern euros and that is it.
Bro are you retard, you have first claim we wuzzing by Claiming Romans and Greek as Sandnigger semites
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top