L
Soys/normies always say that people can see the true intention of someone behind all his words due to intuition, they think that minor slipups or the body language betrays them. The reason why they claim this bullshit is probably the TV: On TV you see characters that make intrigues against each other and plot all the time and there are always subtle hints (=foreshadowing) that some figures could be the villains.
Because reality and fiction have become inseperable for many of these soys they think that real people behave in a way as seen in TV (just look at them in political debates with all their references about media designed for children like Star Wars and Harry Potter).
They don't realise that the actor deliberately overexaggerates body language and speech patterns in order to increase the tension and drop hints about the true motivation of their characters - they try to convey a message for the audience. In real life people don't behave in such a clear way. Nobody can/will be able to read true motivations when it comes to body language or speech patterns and those who claim to be able to do such a thing in real life are most of the time pseudoscientific charlatans.
The funny moment comes when they (sometimes rightfully) accuse others of pseudoscience (like graphologists/profilers) but believe in made-up bullshit like being able to deduce everything about someone with subtle cues/hints like Sherlock Holmes.
Because reality and fiction have become inseperable for many of these soys they think that real people behave in a way as seen in TV (just look at them in political debates with all their references about media designed for children like Star Wars and Harry Potter).
They don't realise that the actor deliberately overexaggerates body language and speech patterns in order to increase the tension and drop hints about the true motivation of their characters - they try to convey a message for the audience. In real life people don't behave in such a clear way. Nobody can/will be able to read true motivations when it comes to body language or speech patterns and those who claim to be able to do such a thing in real life are most of the time pseudoscientific charlatans.
The funny moment comes when they (sometimes rightfully) accuse others of pseudoscience (like graphologists/profilers) but believe in made-up bullshit like being able to deduce everything about someone with subtle cues/hints like Sherlock Holmes.
