Correct, civilization is nothing more than the alliance of non-criminal men controlling women's penchant for criminal men, and women hate it.
Correct, AMAF is the exception when it comes to Asian American women. Native Asian would do the same, of course; there just aren't enough WM to go around there.
Yes. I've been consuming a lot of pre-history human evolution crap lately and our past was indeed brutish.
The tribe, family, or band over the hill was your competition and they had males that wanted to kill you, your sons, take your women, and take your food.
If they saw you on the other side of a lake, no words of exchange we're needed. The foid or foids that were with you would only stay and breed with you if you were capable of fighting and killing those males on the other side of the lake in the future.
When civilization occurred roughly 10,000 to 5000 years ago, civilized men had to find a way to keep foids and those violent brutish men in check. otherwise civilization wouldn't work even with all of the excess food/livestock.
Western civilization has entered a hyperized version of it's liberal self. And "progressive" nowadays simply means lowering theirselves to appease the lesser civilized. It's regressive for them, but better for the more brutish blacks and browns that they have to appease.
In fact, the concern of some academic elites in the west with regards to china's rise is that the east asian mindset is inadequate in the context of a globalized world. inadequate in the sense that east asians are too content with their selves. In other words, too happy and content with being asian, implying that the men who have power over there in the far east, have no desire to be with non-asian women. which is a problem in their eyes.
in their eyes, they would prefer if all of east asia looked exactly like san francisco. That's right. 70+ percent of asian women with white/non-asian men with 70+% of asian men single with their hands in their pockets, with 95-98+ percent of non-asian foids wanting nothing to do with asian men.
as of right now, the showdown at the lake analogy I mentioned earlier applies between the west and the east. to see which one can out last the other. the west wants to be "progressive" and still somehow manage to survive. and the east is battling the onslaught of extremely low birth rates because of the social effects of western progressivism/globalization. the pacific ocean acting as a physical barrier with america's pacific naval fleet acting to serve as the bridge between white men's and non-asian men's sperm into noodlewhores.
the east is currently winning in my opinion. America's cities are very quickly becoming mini-brazils, mexicos, and south africas. They're crime ridden, corrupt, poorly run, violent, unhappy, and unlivable. The pacific american naval fleet will be useless in the near future but my guess is that the western elites will try their utmost best in getting japan and china to fight a devastating war in the near future with exchanges of tactical nuclear weapons. for the greater israel empire to expand in the middle east, and for the west to out survive the east, they will need a devastating war between china and japan.