No, what spawned the idea of "Enforced Monogamy" was the idea of the "sexual revolution" failing

[Hellothere]

You can't make anyone be together obviously, but I feel this idea came more so from the endless wave of infidelity/social sexual polyamory IE seeing many people at once coupled with no sense of commitment/fidelity/family/trust/love. Not "neo-misogony from the manosphere!"

https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/d3k3ex/jordan-peterson-enforced-monogamy-incels
Well yes, redistribute sex more equally, just like how the socialist communists want to share the wealth/the original idea of the sexual revolution.
MRA/MGTOW were more spawned from guys getting fucked over. Not all this other shit.
“the argument that society should be rearranged to accommodate [incels] is so repulsive that it should not be entertained.”- But, BUT!!!! We should be able to do it for "oppressed fat dumb smelly hairy ugly feminists" and/or "Gay tranny lesbian pan tran genderqueer whatever the fuck they are calling themselves on a given day"

Why not? We have attempted or done it to accomodate others, why not those more frustrated?

 

[Gone Coping]

monogamy benefits men moreso than it does women, so it will continue to be demonised. It's been said a million times before but male issues in general, let alone issues affecting low status males, are never taken seriously by society. Even by other men.

 

[Hellothere]

"the kind of men who might otherwise go and shoot up schools or commit some other acts of horrendous violence."- Well fuck, Richard Ramirez had followers/fans/groupies, Charles Manson did, even that little quasi sand nigger faggot who bombed the Boston Marathon did, and where is the outrage over that? Where are the daddies to step in and slap some sense into the daughters?

monogamy benefits men moreso than it does women, so it will continue to be demonised. It's been said a million times before but male issues in general, let alone issues affecting low status males, are never taken seriously by society. Even by other men.

Sad but true my friend.
Like forget about looks, leagues, "Chad's Stacies", Alphas/Betas, players, cucks, etc, forget about all of that for a moment, if perhaps encouraging an environment of love, loyalty, trust, family, support, etc, is that really so bad? I am not calling for anyone to be a slave or robot, but is this really such an awful idea? Is saying hey don't cheat on people and fuck them over, really so bad? Don't deal with that one guy who you know you can't change cause it ain't so good, really so bad?
Like I can't be all up in someone's business or tell them what to do, but I don't like it when dudes to that shit either, cheating, or trading up, like there's a big difference between two people who just can't work it out and they break up or get divorced, and this like constant screwing everyone over thing.

 

[WarriorSkull]

monogamy benefits men moreso than it does women, so it will continue to be demonised. It's been said a million times before but male issues in general, let alone issues affecting low status males, are never taken seriously by society. Even by other men.

I think the problem is what constitutes "benefitting women" isn't so cut and dry. I mean, it definitely isn't what women want, but then again I don't in the least believe that women want what is best for them and they will destroy the very society they live in pursuit of their selfish desires. I've argued before that women aren't ever happy and it logically follows that if women are never happy, then they aren't any happier with Chad than they are an incel, it is just that the pool of potentially better men to replace Chad with is much smaller than the one she can replace the incel with.

 

[Deleted member 4159]

Death to all infidels