For thousands of years, humanity has attempted to enforce ethics through supernatural and secular punishments; this rabid aggression has been both necessary and ridiculous. It has been necessary because a rational proof of secular ethics has never been achieved; it has been ridiculous because it...
freedomain.com
I've read most of it and holy shit, it's almost of mumbo jumbo to drain your energy and debating power.
Rape, murder, robbery, have NEVER been Universally preferable behavior in the eyes of humans. Just look at medieval times and even now in Palestine.
Society is an alliance of sorts "I will no kill you if you no kill me, let's work on our interests" and so it goes
Evil was reserved for the "enemy", nothing was too far off the line against "them". Rape was considered specially vile because it was not only attacking the 'prudeness'of the woman but also an insult to the man in position of 'owner' (be it a father, brother or husband)
The truth is, if there is no divine morality, then the only "morality" there would be would be the morality of nature and evolution, AKA the betterment and further evolution of the species. There is NO real ground for UPB nor benefit.
If two guys fought over one woman, the bluepild moral approach would be to let the woman decide who to pick.
That isn't the most effective in the eyes of evolution because the man she chooses could have a chronic syndrome that he would pass to his offspring.
The moral evolutionary answer is to let them fight, and the one with better genes and more power can decide who to kill, rape, torture at will.
"Cool" you may be thinking, but you have to realize the guy getting their skull stomped out is us, and the guy winning is Chad. This secular eugenics morality shit only servers to cuck us incels even harder.
