Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious No such thing as "Ephebophilia" exists among straight males

ANTAGONIST

ANTAGONIST

Anti-Ogre activist
★★
Joined
Jan 4, 2026
Posts
5,144
Online time
4d 16h
"Ephebophilia" does not exist as a chronophilia among straight men. For practical purposes, i will say that it does not exist all.

It is what used to be an obscure term for homosexual faggots (see below), but due to political correctness (rejection of gendered language, egalitarianism) and wikipedia's misinformation (whether it's due to negligence or deliberate), has led to it being used as a gender-neutral term. It is actually commonly used by seemingly anti-agecuck voices but the usage of this absurd term actually doesn't help their agenda at all.

it is completely natural for straight men of any age to find women of childbearing ages attractive. The term is falsely used to label male reproductive sexuality as a fringe deviation to reinforce to appease the hylic masses and reinforce the feminist "age of consent" legislature (that is designed to destroy traditional family structures and lower the birthrate).

The origin of the term

While the Wikipedia article for "Ephebophilia" never explicitly mentions that the word only applies to homophiliacs ("homosexuals"), reading between the lines and paying even a little attention, along with using your brain leads to the crystal clear conclusion that it is indeed a term that could logically apply to homophilic behaviour.

Right away, the main picture on the wiki page shows a visual representation of pederasty in Greece (homophilia).

Just like many other terms in this psychiatry, the term is made-up of greek words.

Ephebos ( ἔφηβος ) = a term for a male adolescent in Ancient Greece.

While the "philia" suffix (meaning love) is usually used to denote various paraphilic disorders.

How would a term that directly translates to "attraction to young men" ever mean sexual attraction to 15-19 to year olds, including females? Spoiler: It doesn't.

FourPages

86 for boy


As you can see, literature from a little over 40 years ago clearly defines it as a sexual attraction to young males. Note that this literature is from the 1980s, this is important because before the 1970s, there was no need to use this term at all since homosexuality (or how it's more appropriately called homophilia) was classified as a mental disorder already.

Before that, the term was used by pro-homosexual activists as a positive label for themselves including Magnus Hirschfeld in the first half of the 20th century and later by dutch pro-pederasty/homosexuality activist Frits Bernard in the 1950s.

Then, the term was then later revived by Ray Blanchard in it's new absurd form to mean "sexual attraction to 15-19 year olds". The same guy also wanted to introduce "hebephilia" as an entry in the DSM, thankfully the proposal was rejected. It's clear that he has a pro "age of consent" political agenda in mind and is willing to rewrite evolutionary science in his attempt to further said agenda. The modern definition, that is used by Wikipedia, agecucks and incompetent anti-agecucks stems from his "research".

To recap:

● The word uses greek words that refer to it's origin as a term for only homosexual behaviour
● The complete origins of the term are murky
● At some point, the word was used by pro-homosexual voices as a term for themselves
● When homosexuality became legal, it was used as a term for homosexuals who were attracted to men younger than socially/legally acceptable.
● Ray Blanchard created a new gender-neutral definition for the word and popularized it to further the agecuck agenda.


Misleading terms such as these help the feminist agecuck agenda

The modern definition of the word didn't arise from genuine research into human sexual behaviour, it was created to reflect the already existing unfounded biases in American society and an attempt to give them "a scientific basis".

Many anti-agecucks sadly keep using the false definiton of this homosexual disorder in debate. For example when falsely accused of pedophilia by an agecuck for finding a pubescent/postpubescent female attractive, the uneducated non-agecuck may respond with "Actually, It's not pedophilia, it's actually ephebophilia" :feelstastyman:

This is problematic because it makes natural male sexuality seem like a fringe disorder. Finding any female who is well into puberty attractive is NOT a paraphilia, it's natural and the default for every healthy heterosexual male.

It's also important to mention that neither "hebephilia" or "ephebophilia" has been classified as a psychiatric disorder by any reputable diagnosis manual, meaning that it's not even recognized, the only reason why the word is so frequently used in the first place is because of the Wikipedia articles that exist about it.

Finding fertile women attractive is not deviant. The feminists want you to believe that it is.
 
Last edited:
@Urlaubsinsel @Reddit=Bandwagonism
 
Well written post.

I think that 15 and 16 year old foids are the most attractive, on average.

I am certainly not willing to go to prison over it.
So, I would never fuck one…..even if I could.

But, I don’t deny what I truly think either.
 
:yes: Trvthnvke brother!
Saying that you are a pedophile for finding a 15 years old fertile woman attractive is already anti nature/human biology!

Only the brainwashed/ignorant goyshits will resort to this thing!
 
Well written post.
Thanks! I enjoy your posts as well.
I think that 15 and 16 year old foids are the most attractive, on average.
Most men actually do, which makes the idea that it's some unusual thing called "Ephebophilia" so laughable in the first place.
I am certainly not willing to go to prison over it.
So, I would never fuck one…..even if I could.
I would fuck 16 year olds in a heartbeat since it's legal in my home country. Sadly due to the social conditioning and american media, most people still likely wouldn't approve of such relations even if the agegap is small and there is nothing illegal about it.
 
:yes: Trvthnvke brother!
Saying that you are a pedophile for finding a 15 years old fertile woman attractive is already anti nature/human biology!
Absolutely. Most people hate their own nature.

They think that it's okay to find other 15 year old attractive when you yourself are 15, but then magically when you are over 18, suddenly it isn't. In reality, all men of all ages find developed 15 year olds attractive but pretend not to.
Only the brainwashed/ignorant goyshits will resort to this thing!
:yes::yes::yes::yes:

"muh teenagers are children" :soy::foidSoy:
 
14 is legal in my country, so no biggie here.
 
Isn't it like "when the partner is younger than 20, then it's 14 but otherwise it's 16/18" :soy: or some crap like that?
I think it's 14 when the parents are ok with it.

But tbh, what dude would ask for an ID if the foid is down to fuck?

I certainly wouldn't, let me tell you. That is such a buzz killer. jfl

Not my fault if the foid jumps on my dick. pff
 
I made a similar thread on this and another example of egalitarian conflations against men are the words “child molester” and “pederast” which are obviously two of not the same and the combination of these two different phenomena into one and the wrong claim that they are the same. For pederasty, pederast tries to distinguish between different types of gays where the distinction is none but for the word child molester, it doesn't distinguish between gays and straights where the distinction is acually important so these elitist just change the meanings of words right under our nose to punish men, and when you repress bad sexual behavior by males, and you literally just refuse to repress bad sexual behavior by females, you get very little bad sexual behavior by males, and a whole lot of bad sexual behavior by females as seen with the Jacquerie. I mean, women want penis even before puberty so if you taint them it's obviously different from raping a little boy who has zero desire for sex, it's just sadism at that point.
 
Last edited:
I made a similar thread on this and another example of egalitarian conflations against men are the words “child molester” and “pederast” which are obviously two of not the same and the combination of these two different phenomena into one and the wrong claim that they are the same. For pederasty, pederast tries to distinguish between different types of gays where the distinction is none but for the word child molester, it doesn't distinguish between gays and straights where the distinction is acually important so these elitist just change the meanings of words right under our nose to punish men, and when you repress bad sexual behavior by males, and you literally just refuse to repress bad sexual behavior by females, you get very little bad sexual behavior by males, and a whole lot of bad sexual behavior by females as seen with the Jacquerie. I mean, women want penis even before puberty so if you taint them it's obviously different from literally a little boy who has zero desire for sex, it's just sadism at that point.
Liberals protect gay child-rapists and even made it easy for them by allowing gays to adopt a child (which coincidentally is always a little boy.
 
too high IQ for me to say anything to this post
 
First of all, thank you for this well researched post. I can’t tell you put effort into it :feelsYall: I never knew about the history about the term “ephebophilia,” was a term used to describe homosexuals. I’m definitely saving this post to read it again and again in the future. I also wanted to add that hebephilia also doesn’t exist as a disorder among straight men, but you mentioned that at the end. The only small thing I’d add is that even if both ephebophilia and hemophilia were considered “disorders.” It’s meaningless and I completely reject these terms. The “reputable diagnosis manual” aren’t really that reputable. They are the same ones who would tell you that there are idk how many genders and that it’s better for kids to transition if they want to. Human beings are capable of believing in rationalizing their absurdities. These “scientific” institutions are filled with people who adopt certain beliefs as much as if they were religion. Who cares what the DSM say?
Normscum love appealing to authority because they are conformist scum. Lastly, growing up, I always heard retarded ex religious people claim that they aren’t afraid to question stuff. With virtually no exception, all of them ended up adopting the new liberal religion, and non of them question transgendarism, age cuckery, abortion, etc. I mention this just to say that you’re a genuine exception. I thought I was the only one in the world and sometimes it drove me to nearly quitting on life, because no pain is greater than belonging to no group. You sir are an exemption and genuinely not afraid of both, actually questioning everything, and changing your beliefs. :blackpill::feelsYall::hax::bigbrain:
 
First of all, thank you for this well researched post. I can’t tell you put effort into it :feelsYall: I never knew about the history about the term “ephebophilia,” was a term used to describe homosexuals. I’m definitely saving this post to read it again and again in the future. I also wanted to add that hebephilia also doesn’t exist as a disorder among straight men, but you mentioned that at the end. The only small thing I’d add is that even if both ephebophilia and hemophilia were considered “disorders.” It’s meaningless and I completely reject these terms.
Yep, those are meaningless labels and there is no way to rationalize them which is why the system has to resort to fear and intimitation to do so.
The “reputable diagnosis manual” aren’t really that reputable. They are the same ones who would tell you that there are idk how many genders and that it’s better for kids to transition if they want to. Human beings are capable of believing in rationalizing their absurdities. These “scientific” institutions are filled with people who adopt certain beliefs as much as if they were religion. Who cares what the DSM say?
I just added in that fact for the agecucks and science fans specifically to show that even their own gods (the "officals") don't believe in that "ephebo/hebephilia" crap. I myself personally don't care what the DSM has to say at all.
Normscum love appealing to authority because they are conformist scum. Lastly, growing up, I always heard retarded ex religious people claim that they aren’t afraid to question stuff. With virtually no exception, all of them ended up adopting the new liberal religion, and non of them question transgendarism, age cuckery, abortion, etc.
Most people are just sheep. It's literally impossible to change their minds without being the establishment that rules over them.
I mention this just to say that you’re a genuine exception. I thought I was the only one in the world and sometimes it drove me to nearly quitting on life, because no pain is greater than belonging to no group. You sir are an exemption and genuinely not afraid of both, actually questioning everything, and changing your beliefs. :blackpill::feelsYall::hax::bigbrain:
Thanks, never give up. Just a tip: you should put spaces between paragraphs when posting long texts.

Also check out this thread i made the other day, i am sure you will like it.

 
Yep, those are meaningless labels and there is no way to rationalize them which is why the system has to resort to fear and intimitation to do so.

I just added in that fact for the agecucks and science fans specifically to show that even their own gods (the "officals") don't believe in that "ephebo/hebephilia" crap. I myself personally don't care what the DSM has to say at all.

Most people are just sheep. It's literally impossible to change their minds without being the establishment that rules over them.

Thanks, never give up. Just a tip: you should put spaces between paragraphs when posting long texts.

Also check out this thread i made the other day, i am sure you will like it.

Thanks brother! Thank you for clarifying why you mentioned the fact that even their “scientific” institutions don’t affirm their beliefs.
“Thanks, never give up. Just a tip: you should put spaces between paragraphs when posting long texts.” Thanks for the advice :feelsYall: I’ll try to remember that.
I’m going to sleep now, but I’ll check your other post tomorrow. I know it’ll be thought provoking as well.
 

Similar threads

Gott _mit _uns94
Replies
9
Views
910
Pikacel
Pikacel
Freixel
Replies
11
Views
581
Mrzimljude
Mrzimljude
Fraud.
Replies
0
Views
429
Fraud.
Fraud.
Sir Silentium
Replies
19
Views
763
Sir Silentium
Sir Silentium
Cryo
Replies
5
Views
441
CRASH THE CUCK
CRASH THE CUCK

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top