CLICKBAIT TITLE AND SCHITZO-THREAD.
> Nick Fuentes has dinner with Trump 2 years ago, causing media focuses on the Trump-Fuentes connection, inflating the situation.
> If Nick endorsed Trump, it would've energized millions to vote for Kamala.
> Nick distances himself, stripping the media of further ammo against Trump, leading narrative to gradually fizzle.
> Trump wins without extra heat in the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election.
> Celebrate Trump's success overniggress foid candidate Kamila Harris.
> Proceed to go viral on the news and social media for "Your Body, My Choice."
"In some ways, the Trump campaign now is a lot less radical than it was before. It's sort of mixed because, as you’re right to point out, they did have signs that said ‘mass deportations’ at the convention, and that’s huge because they were talking about amnesty just 10 years ago. Now they’re holding up signs that say that. You can’t overstate what a big deal that is.
At the same time, people inside the movement are chipping away. For example, in the platform, which Trump personally edited for himself this year, they dropped opposition to abortion and gay marriage. They’re now also saying they’re in favor of legal immigration. This is really bad—specifically, they claimed they would staple green cards to diplomas, meaning give foreign students permanent residence. It’s happened before in Australia and Canada. Now in Australia, 4% of the population is foreign students, and liberal governments are trying to shut it down because it’s just too much even for them. It’s like—we’re getting radicalized against illegal immigration, but they’re also getting us to support legal immigration and redefining identity.
Thinking to 2028, Vance is almost surely the successor in the air to MAGA. Vance is not radical at all. People think he is, but he’s not. He married someone who’s not white, and people say it’s racist to say that, and maybe it is, but Vance doesn’t value his identity. He said he married outside his culture because he hates his own culture. So, this guy is going to run for MAGA, and he’s going to have a pretty good claim to run for MAGA. Now let’s say someone more radical runs against him—it’s really splitting hairs. You can’t go to the voters and say ‘I’m against race mixing’—that doesn’t play. But if Trump goes down this cycle and they run against Nikki Haley in 2028, it’s going to be very easy for someone more radical to say ‘I’m a real nationalist. Vote for me, not Haley.’ It’s really a dialectical thing where Trumpism is being diluted, and in 2028, when he’s not in the running, they’re going to dilute it further, and that will be seen as a radical option. No one is going to run to the right of that with any credibility. I’m deeply concerned about the backsliding.
This is more complex than ‘Trump is going to be a better president.’ We’ve been outmaneuvered for 50 years—real nationalists like Pat Buchanan and the Paleocons. They’ve been outmaneuvered for 50 years by the neocons, and it’s about to happen again unless we're smart."
"But Nick Fuentes kept bitching about Trump!"
Nick Fuentes' ability to criticize Trump comes from the fact that Trump isn't fully aligned with based moral or ideological imperatives. This kind of factional behaviour is also present in the MENA region, where you have 'Muslims' who are loyal to Saudi Family and Arabia, and then others who reject every modern-day international 'Islamic' government and support alternatives like IS.
Fuentes has his own set of beliefs and priorities that align with nationalism and traditionalist values, which don't line up with Trump's more moderate stances or his shifts over time. I don't know why Republicans don't understand that Fuentes doesn't see Trump as the primary 'saviour' leading the conservative cause.
Groypers face massive censorship, which is why I believe Nick Fuentes resorted to getting mainstream appearance through already controversial influencers across YouTube. He's already good associates and friends with Keith Woods, and possibly David Duke and Jared Taylor.
A LOT OF NORMIES now know who he is from these trending sound-clips, and he was already associated to the JQ-pilled Kanye West phase that was viral.
He has everything already sorted in his world. All Nick has to do is to stay consistent and observe the changing-political landscape. Stay consistent with radicalisation and influence. Avoiding direct promises to run for anything, or staying ambiguous in that regard, he can continue to speak against the establishment without being forced to play its rules. He can continue to be supported subtly, or make space for other online personas to 'talk'. Jake Shields accompanied him to his rally before this summer.
This might sound obvious, but don't you get the feeling that racism, or at least race-awareness is being more mainstream? The JQ? Forget Instagram and Facebook. Do you know how many anti-immigrant protests happen in Ireland? UK? I'm not sure about France, but similar in Russia and Spain...right? Like I said before, I as an immigrantcel will not be here for much longer.
Honestly, the only reason to be against Nick Fuentes as a white male is if you hate Christianity. To be honest, it breeds more collectivism, especially if you already agree with a lot of his views. But then again, you won't be thrilled by Fuentes's view on blasphemy being a capital punishment.
> Nick Fuentes has dinner with Trump 2 years ago, causing media focuses on the Trump-Fuentes connection, inflating the situation.
> If Nick endorsed Trump, it would've energized millions to vote for Kamala.
> Nick distances himself, stripping the media of further ammo against Trump, leading narrative to gradually fizzle.
> Trump wins without extra heat in the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election.
> Celebrate Trump's success over
> Proceed to go viral on the news and social media for "Your Body, My Choice."
Interesting wording."In some ways, the Trump campaign now is a lot less radical than it was before. It's sort of mixed because, as you’re right to point out, they did have signs that said ‘mass deportations’ at the convention, and that’s huge because they were talking about amnesty just 10 years ago. Now they’re holding up signs that say that. You can’t overstate what a big deal that is.
At the same time, people inside the movement are chipping away. For example, in the platform, which Trump personally edited for himself this year, they dropped opposition to abortion and gay marriage. They’re now also saying they’re in favor of legal immigration. This is really bad—specifically, they claimed they would staple green cards to diplomas, meaning give foreign students permanent residence. It’s happened before in Australia and Canada. Now in Australia, 4% of the population is foreign students, and liberal governments are trying to shut it down because it’s just too much even for them. It’s like—we’re getting radicalized against illegal immigration, but they’re also getting us to support legal immigration and redefining identity.
Thinking to 2028, Vance is almost surely the successor in the air to MAGA. Vance is not radical at all. People think he is, but he’s not. He married someone who’s not white, and people say it’s racist to say that, and maybe it is, but Vance doesn’t value his identity. He said he married outside his culture because he hates his own culture. So, this guy is going to run for MAGA, and he’s going to have a pretty good claim to run for MAGA. Now let’s say someone more radical runs against him—it’s really splitting hairs. You can’t go to the voters and say ‘I’m against race mixing’—that doesn’t play. But if Trump goes down this cycle and they run against Nikki Haley in 2028, it’s going to be very easy for someone more radical to say ‘I’m a real nationalist. Vote for me, not Haley.’ It’s really a dialectical thing where Trumpism is being diluted, and in 2028, when he’s not in the running, they’re going to dilute it further, and that will be seen as a radical option. No one is going to run to the right of that with any credibility. I’m deeply concerned about the backsliding.
This is more complex than ‘Trump is going to be a better president.’ We’ve been outmaneuvered for 50 years—real nationalists like Pat Buchanan and the Paleocons. They’ve been outmaneuvered for 50 years by the neocons, and it’s about to happen again unless we're smart."
I bolded the sections where I believe Nick Fuentes has the ambition to position himself in Office."But Nick Fuentes kept bitching about Trump!"
Nick Fuentes' ability to criticize Trump comes from the fact that Trump isn't fully aligned with based moral or ideological imperatives. This kind of factional behaviour is also present in the MENA region, where you have 'Muslims' who are loyal to Saudi Family and Arabia, and then others who reject every modern-day international 'Islamic' government and support alternatives like IS.
Fuentes has his own set of beliefs and priorities that align with nationalism and traditionalist values, which don't line up with Trump's more moderate stances or his shifts over time. I don't know why Republicans don't understand that Fuentes doesn't see Trump as the primary 'saviour' leading the conservative cause.
Groypers face massive censorship, which is why I believe Nick Fuentes resorted to getting mainstream appearance through already controversial influencers across YouTube. He's already good associates and friends with Keith Woods, and possibly David Duke and Jared Taylor.
A LOT OF NORMIES now know who he is from these trending sound-clips, and he was already associated to the JQ-pilled Kanye West phase that was viral.
He has everything already sorted in his world. All Nick has to do is to stay consistent and observe the changing-political landscape. Stay consistent with radicalisation and influence. Avoiding direct promises to run for anything, or staying ambiguous in that regard, he can continue to speak against the establishment without being forced to play its rules. He can continue to be supported subtly, or make space for other online personas to 'talk'. Jake Shields accompanied him to his rally before this summer.
This might sound obvious, but don't you get the feeling that racism, or at least race-awareness is being more mainstream? The JQ? Forget Instagram and Facebook. Do you know how many anti-immigrant protests happen in Ireland? UK? I'm not sure about France, but similar in Russia and Spain...right? Like I said before, I as an immigrantcel will not be here for much longer.
Honestly, the only reason to be against Nick Fuentes as a white male is if you hate Christianity. To be honest, it breeds more collectivism, especially if you already agree with a lot of his views. But then again, you won't be thrilled by Fuentes's view on blasphemy being a capital punishment.
Last edited:
