Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Nick Fuentes is based unlike that Charlie KIKE everyone is crying over.

bcroger

bcroger

Banned
-
Joined
Feb 25, 2023
Posts
7,910
Everyone is crying over Charlie KIKE and his stupid cow blonde, wife, but Nick is actually based and the closest thing to an incel that society has to offer.
 
based is cuck cuck is based , whateevr bro i dont care .
none of them gets me pussy , politics is just jester
 
Caring about politics as an incel is useless
 
nick is a sex haver who gives a fuck about him he even gets asked out on streams fuck him
 
He is based but fakecel.

1758484032138
 
It’s more surprising how people haven’t memory holed Kirk by now
 

Kirk was more based than Nick. He was anti-immigration and was becoming anti-Israel.

For example, by 2023 he had apparently proposed halting all immigration.

Towards the beginning of my discussion, I’d noted that Tucker Carlson had been invited to speak at the national convention of Kirk’s organization. Carlson had used that opportunity to very courageously inform all those thousands of young conservative activists that almost everyone in DC assumed that Epstein had been working for the Israeli Mossad, providing that foreign spy organization with the blackmail evidence it used to maintain control of our own elected officials.

For generations, the American conservative movement has been notoriously pro-Israel, so I was greatly surprised that the huge audience of young conservatives overcame their lifelong indoctrination, strongly supporting Carlson’s bold statements and even giving him wild cheers.


In the weeks after Carlson’s remarkably candid speech and the reaction it drew, I’d come across a few scattered indications that Kirk was becoming far more publicly critical of Israel, perhaps even starting to follow the political trajectory of Candace Owens, who had originally come from a very similar ideological background.

Although I hadn’t been aware of it at the time, within hours of Kirk’s assassination, one of his past video clips sharply condemning the anti-white activism of Jewish groups in America went viral on the Internet, with this single Tweet viewed near


Earlier this year I’d published an article summarizing Israel’s long history of high-profile political assassinations, a record unmatched in all of world history, and this particular incident certainly fit very well into that pattern.

Three months earlier I’d summarized the strong, even overwhelming evidence that Israel had played a central role in the deaths of both President Kennedy and his younger brother Robert, and the parallels with Kirk’s killing seemed quite apparent

Therefore, a few hours after hearing of Kirk’s death, I very gingerly raised these possibilities with someone well situated in conservative circles who personally knew Kirk, and was shocked by his response. He unequivocally told me that everyone in Kirk’s circle, even including important Trump Administration officials, suspected that Israel had probably killed the young conservative leader. While such beliefs might not necessarily be correct, I was astonished that they were apparently so widespread without even a hint of those notions reported anywhere in the mainstream or conservative media.

But two days later, this media silence was dramatically broken as the story I’d been privately told by a conservative insider was fully confirmed by a revelatory article published in the Grayzone.

From the article:

In the weeks leading up to his September 10 assassination, Kirk had come to loathe the Israeli leader, regarding him as a “bully,” the source said

According to Kirk’s friend, who also enjoyed access to President Donald Trump and his inner circle, Kirk strongly warned Trump last June against bombing Iran on Israel’s behalf. “Charlie was the only person who did that,” they said, recalling how Trump “barked at him” in response and angrily shut down the conversation

Yet he simultaneously ceded to his base, wondering aloud if Jeffrey Epstein was an Israeli intelligence asset, questioning whether the Israeli government allowed the October 7 attacks to proceed in order to advance long-term political goals, and parroting narratives familiar to his most vociferous critic on the right, streamer Nick Fuentes.

This July, at his TPUSA Student Action Summit, Kirk provided a forum for the right-wing grassroots to vent its fury about Israel’s political hammerlock on the Trump administration. There, speakers from former Fox News stalwarts Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly, to the anti-Zionist Jewish comedian Dave Smith, denounced Israel’s blood-soaked assault on the besieged Gaza Strip, branded Jeffrey Epstein as an Israeli intelligence asset, and openly taunted Zionist billionaires like Bill Ackman for “getting away with scams” despite having “no actual skills.”

Kirk appeared visibly outraged during an August 6 interview with conservative host Megyn Kelly, as he discussed the menacing messages he was receiving from pro-Israel bigwigs.

In one of his final interviews, conducted with Israel’s premier influencer in the United States, Ben Shapiro, Kirk once again tried to raise the issue of censorship of Israel critics.

Many advancing the unsubstantiated theory have pointed to a Twitter/X post by Harrison Smith, a personality at the pro-Trump Infowars network, stating on August 13 – almost a month before Kirk’s assassination – that he was told by “someone close to Charlie Kirk that Kirk thinks Israel will kill him if he turns against Israel.”

Back to the main article:
Nonetheless, it seems clear that Kirk had increasingly moved into sharp conflict with Israel and therefore apparently feared for his life at the hands of a country whose record of political assassinations is
unrivaled across all of human history.
 

Kirk was more based than Nick. He was anti-immigration and was becoming anti-Israel.





















From the article:















Back to the main article:
Charlie KIKE was owned by the Jews. Tired of all these threads of angry incels crying over him. They are acting worse than normies.

He openly stated that he did not mind if the USA became majority non-white as long as they come in legally and are mostly Christian. He never advocated for pre 1965 immigration and strongly supported Israel.



Here are some quotes to prove that he is Jew owned:

“And by the way, I want to be very clear. I’m just talking about illegal immigration, we have many great legal immigrants coming into this country, too.”
He said that he would not mind of the USA became 90% indian
When pressed further with: “So if it is 90% Indian Christian, is that still America?”, Kirk said:


“If it’s Christian, yes.”



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HzXcijh08w





another quote
“legal immigrants contribute much to America and we welcome them for their contributions”
 
I didn't like his views on niggers and immigration thought he was a traitor to his race but I still like some of his views
 
Everyone is crying over Charlie KIKE and his stupid cow blonde, wife, but Nick is actually based and the closest thing to an incel that society has to offer.
He changes his opinions from one show to the next, sometimes within the same show, so he can farm clips and have every position lol.

He's not "based" at all. Nick suckers are the worst.
 

Similar threads

SEWER_MANCER
Replies
56
Views
3K
Spice
Spice
CursedMutantSoul
Replies
33
Views
2K
A Life Of Defeat
A Life Of Defeat
FastBlast
Replies
22
Views
2K
TooSomething
TooSomething
FarangInDaNang
Replies
60
Views
2K
Spooky_Heejin
Spooky_Heejin

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top