
Oneitiscel
Failed Jestermaxxx LDAR Extraordinaire
★
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2018
- Posts
- 4,556
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/psychology/comments/1khqvpe/online_incel_forums_generate_dark_emotional/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
Notable excerpts from the SageJournals article (KEKFUEL):
In terms of linguistic barriers, trolling and “shitposting” are prominent features of the community. While the extent of trolling is difficult to quantify, members employ a rather distinctive jargon, which can be interpreted as a symbolic way of communicating within the community. This jargon manifests visually through symbols such as “Pepe the Frog” and DC's “The Joker,” the former being a symbol assimilated by trolls and alt-right activists, and the latter depicting a villain aspiring to destroy society.
For instance, terms like “foid” and “toilets” are commonly used in lieu of “women” in forum discussions. The recurrent substitution of derogatory terms for women serves as a rallying symbol for group members. This in-group language and jargon not only strengthen communal bonds but also demarcates community boundaries, alienating those not familiar with the nuanced meanings and connotations. These distinctive words and stories serve as emblems of community membership and forms of cultural capital, with prestige accorded to those who expose “fakecels” and uphold the community's linguistic norms.
Regarding legitimacy challenges, the community has a pronounced internal social hierarchy, often leading to skepticism and scrutiny directed at newcomers or perceived outsiders. New members face challenges to their legitimacy and alignment with incel ideologies. Established members often express dislike with the perspectives brought forth by newer members. For instance, as one member expresses this: “The blackpill is supposed to be unique and reflective, which is contradictory to what new ‘incels’ puts forward, it's why all of us older users highly dislike the new graycels that are joining.” Here, “graycels,” being newcomers not fully indoctrinated into the ideology, are not considered to be full members of the community. This hierarchical structure is evident in interactions where the term “graycel” is employed pejoratively, even toward established members, highlighting the prevailing challenges for newcomers in gaining acceptance and impacting the community dialogue. For example, while we cannot statistically validate this due to data limitation, we noticed that members with “only” a few hundred posts were rarely to receive responses during thread discussions, indicating a perceptible hierarchical delineation based on contribution history and a general reluctance to accept others into the community.
Some users call for some form of social ritual or mechanism to further divide the community and separate well-established members from newcomers. For instance, as expressed by this member:
My initiation is that you’d have to kill a pet on camera, people generally loves pets, and ending a life is a very impactful thing, I could gauge their reactions and see if they are pressing themselves or not, if you lack the heart to kill animals that we as humans hold dear to us like “family”, then you aren’t black pilled.
This toxic environment is exemplified in the following post:
I vote for self-improvement salesman and hope shills to get ban from this forum. I am sick of self-improvement assholes shilling normie advice. If people want to laying down and rot, it is their fucking choice, mind your own fucking business if you are doing great in life. The forum should be a place where people share their grievances with people in similar situation. Hope is cope and go fuck yourself if your life is good.
Negative support, more common, encourages destructive behavior, illustrated by a blunt suggestion from another user to commit suicide: “KILL YOURSELF (IN REAL LIFE, NOT IN VIDEO GAME).”
Last edited: