I created a simple system to categorize men.
Sex worthy:
This can be either;
1) Women instantly want to fuck him, usually without thinking twice (Chad)
2) Lacking few small features so that needs phychological games to "pick her up" wishing that those lacking features will not be noticed until she gets into her bed. He needs "game". If he is lucky, he will not be reported for rape next day. Let's say he not having a perfect face or muscles or a bad style etc. Something is off about him but if Chad is not around he is sometimes having chances.
Non sex worthy:
He doesn't have anything special. Nothing special in looks. A typical normie. He is usually around women, some are friendzoned, some are made fun of etc. Majority of them think that nothing is wrong with their looks. They are mostly bluepilled and waiting for their oneitis.
Invisible:
Usually autistic. They don't make any special effort to be part of social situations as normie does. This guy just acts as he wish, "being himself".He might a gamer, a geek etc. He is not doing a famous sport, play guitar or etc. to just be seen by girls. He might have normie looks but not active in social settings. He might not be attractive but not significantly ugly either.
Physically lacking/Below average:
This guy gets instant turn off by females, sometimes even by males or by anyone in the society, almost all the time due to physical anomalies. He is significantly less attractive than normal. So anyone easily says this guy is ugly after looking for 1 second. Any flaws in his behavior is seen as extreme behavioral issues and as threat to the society just because of his looks. Because there is no tolerance for him. He can be good or bad but first thing being noticed his negative feature (usually facial). This makes it hard to concentrate other outcomes from them.
Edit: I am not yet sure if balding or being short should be included in the psycially lacking category but sometimes it might be true.
This was just a quick work. It can be developed in many ways. It looked like giving a broader perspective than just looks in numbers.
Sex worthy:
This can be either;
1) Women instantly want to fuck him, usually without thinking twice (Chad)
2) Lacking few small features so that needs phychological games to "pick her up" wishing that those lacking features will not be noticed until she gets into her bed. He needs "game". If he is lucky, he will not be reported for rape next day. Let's say he not having a perfect face or muscles or a bad style etc. Something is off about him but if Chad is not around he is sometimes having chances.
Non sex worthy:
He doesn't have anything special. Nothing special in looks. A typical normie. He is usually around women, some are friendzoned, some are made fun of etc. Majority of them think that nothing is wrong with their looks. They are mostly bluepilled and waiting for their oneitis.
Invisible:
Usually autistic. They don't make any special effort to be part of social situations as normie does. This guy just acts as he wish, "being himself".He might a gamer, a geek etc. He is not doing a famous sport, play guitar or etc. to just be seen by girls. He might have normie looks but not active in social settings. He might not be attractive but not significantly ugly either.
Physically lacking/Below average:
This guy gets instant turn off by females, sometimes even by males or by anyone in the society, almost all the time due to physical anomalies. He is significantly less attractive than normal. So anyone easily says this guy is ugly after looking for 1 second. Any flaws in his behavior is seen as extreme behavioral issues and as threat to the society just because of his looks. Because there is no tolerance for him. He can be good or bad but first thing being noticed his negative feature (usually facial). This makes it hard to concentrate other outcomes from them.
Edit: I am not yet sure if balding or being short should be included in the psycially lacking category but sometimes it might be true.
This was just a quick work. It can be developed in many ways. It looked like giving a broader perspective than just looks in numbers.
Last edited:
