Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Hypocrisy Neo Ribentrop-Molotov

  • Thread starter SecularNeo-Khazar
  • Start date
SecularNeo-Khazar

SecularNeo-Khazar

Mixedcell
★★★★★
Joined
Mar 3, 2021
Posts
935
1. THEORY

I think a lot of people have started to realize that the general left has almost without a reflection accepted the fact that as long as a member of the minority lends their strength in the fight against the current system, they can posseses every trait of the fascist without being called as such. Which is literally what they accused the conservatives to do when Kanye said he loves Hitler. As long as you don't say it directly (that we hate jews) we support you, but since you did, we have to denouce you publicly

The schematic is the same, the subject is different, therefore the outcome is different in looks but the essence of the method remains indentical, it is simple sophistry achieved throught aesthethics (in a similar way neo-kantists dress their ethics into far eastern clothes [jacking off to india] and try to infiltrate growing leftists movements).

Literally their relativism is hurting them. In order to uphold their optics (that there are no anthropological differences beetwen humans of all races) the left admits that a minority can be "bigoted, homophobic, transphobic, ableist" etc.

When the German peoples felt unfairly treated, it didn't matter whether the truth was that the jews were behind everything, the question if it was real didn't matter as long as the belief it was so lead to the right feelings that determined their actions.

This shows that independent of the truth the second step is the same - grievence. Justifed or not.

Meaning that the opressed and seemingly opressed both have the same potential for fascism. The genuinly opressed just have it easier to become fascist (Look at the balkans and the ammount of shit serbians do because the turks hurt them)

The left ignores this sociological property. They wield the fascist forces (that are semi-controlled or influenced or somehwat leaning towards fascism) knowing well the white man struck by it will start and develop the same weapon against the minority. The left intentionally grows fascism by using it, the white society therefore comes in contact with it and its spreads into the white society.

2. RANT

Best thing is, common everyday leftie is totally oblivious to those factions. The leftie thinks that the democract black man beside him wants progressive changes because he believes in egalitarianism, no, he votes for it because he knows it will benefit the blacks the most and holds some resentment and prejudice against the white. His motivation is more racial than ideological. Its the same for the more revolutionairy kind. If a reform guarateed a similar comfort of life to that of the suppoused socialist reforms but the capitalist system would remain, the black man would vote for it and call it a day. That's especially the Grow your own garden #landback folks. Only some would remain true to their beliefs.

Another well constrasting example are foids and feminism. There's far more radical feminists then socialist feminists, because foids in a socialist system would have to contribute to the fight against homelesness, which is the outcome of the patriarchical system and men are responsible for that themselves so we, the victims, have nothing to do with it. They focus mostly on cosmetics that have a lot of rhethoritical value in debates and try to subvert the economic system to their advantage by pointing out the current distribution of forces is tied to the patriarchy, as such fundamental cultural rework and therefore, linked with it material conditions, will change - freeing women (giving them many advantages without ever having to work to also fix men's problems in solidarity).

The issue with these feminists is that they hide behind the fight for equality, same way Raskolnikov (considering dostoyevsky was very popular lately, this analogy is rather crisp) was hiding behind justice while killing the old hag. In reallity, both are driven by hatred, personal gain, acting in the moment and executing their emotions in action (as I have written earlier emotions determine actions) that is concluded with the abuse and shaming/destruction of the target while believing they can do what they're doing because they're superior (by the right of physical or abstract condition).

Its only the lack of actual power to directly destroy men these feminists wouldn't go on a killing spree, but through the new system establish a way of exorting revenge for the thousands of years of inequity and try to prolong the state in which the "process of transformation" lasts to capitalize as much as possible. Point being, that the character of their ideology is fascist (as the policies would too be) since they'd be conceived without asking the fundamental question when does punishment become a crime as such, the policies would be entirely based upon a power struggle and conflict. (I don't think a gray matriarchy would be established)

My argument ilustrates that the path of the progressive and the fascist that both are a minority is the same and both will vote for and fight in the interest of their group for the same thing many times joining forces. This essentially puts any other member of any political affiliation in beetwen these two in the same place. The left, in need of support, ignores the radical far right of the minority for practical gain. Meaning there are symbolic victories of the right that can be racist against the whites and also are benefical to the betterment of the minority.

As long as you don't say this out loud, its good. However, some leftist scream about it and see it elsewhere, pointing it out, supporting it. The left doesn't like that, so it punishes its members for their relativism essetial to the marxist worldview.

It is true that Japanese imperialism in WW2 was a symbol of anti-western sentiment.

It is true the Russian war with Ukraine is a symbolic statement against Nato.

It is true that the butchery of the white man in Rhodesia or Haiti (after the slaves won) was a sign of anti-western sentiment (even when these were motivated by rascism, not less bad then that of the white man towards the POC)

It is true that kneeling down before a POC is rascist, as it requires the framework of race for the gesture to hold any meaning.


...

3. PRACTICE

You could accuse me of projecting, therefore I will offer some examples:

-Do you happen to know the neo-marxist post-modernist Vaush? His debate with prof. Flowers is an example of how long the left has been neutral and passive towards the likes of her until he debated her. Ever since that video, he still sometimes reffered to her as a leftist.

-The NOI (Nation of Islam) was a fundamenetal indentitarian hub seen as a leftist heaven for POC's and to this day people uphold its legacy through the continuation of its political thought. C'mon now it is self explonatory.

-The refugee crisis is a excelent example. The Leftist forces have avoided by all means the try to call terrorist acts by name as backward, motivated by hatred, and shifted the blame always to religion. Never had they ever considered any of these to be motivated by racial hatred, and many of them were, the fact of being a muslim played an additional role (just like in new zealand). To call these people intolerant when they themselves screamed "scheisse deustche" etc. Only now did this stop with the left finally admitting that a thing like "interpersonal rascism" exists.

-They say that whites have no culture. Their reasoning here is that "white culture" is a term used to describe American culture that "erased" its ties to european culture and shaped their indentity in some other quirky manner, of which an essential part of slavery and imperialism. The frequent use of this term has been grinded with the concept of race, that the use of the term is a substitue for the word race itself. Fundamentally now that is a expression which perpetuates the idea white people don't have a culture (which is said out of politeness; its a dogwhistle) because colonization, opression and imperialism as well as bigotry aren't part of culture.

4. Conclusion

The left formed a new pact with the far right as it once did. Rather then it being political and material, it is ideological.
 
Anyone without a hardcorely biased and radical mind will realize the left uses fascism when convenient to further their agenda. It's their huge hypocrisy: it doesn't matter what he says, just who he is. If it's an "enlighted leader" it's all good, if not then he's a fascist!! They have combined fascist and marxist tennets.

First paragraph of your rant section exposes how people how. They don't choose based on ideology or how they think the state should be run, they just choose the guy saying he will benefit their group.

Foids will always seek power and vengeance for an imagined oppression over men without consequence. It's in their nature.

Homelessness happens when society fails men and not because of patriarchy, which never really existed.

Only idiots say whites have no culture. Everything is white culture. McDonald's, Volkswagen, catholicism, dating, etc. We live immersed in it, like we are immersed in air.
 

Similar threads

AsiaCel
Replies
17
Views
275
AsiaCel
AsiaCel
stalin22
Replies
2
Views
142
stalin22
stalin22
Sigma
Replies
3
Views
101
blackpillednigga
blackpillednigga
Redbeard7
Replies
6
Views
189
Feeshtu
F
Robb97
Replies
1
Views
165
Vendetta
Vendetta

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top