taken from c/mgtow: (it's a bit long but a good read)
"For those who don’t pay attention to Pedowood (I don’t blame you, since 95% of Pedowood is worse than cancer), the Oppenheimer and Barbie movies came out recently at about the same time and both raked in good money, thus soyciety has sort of tied the two movies by the hip. The two movies also could not be more different. And it’s a good contrast between men and women.
Oppenheimer is about the creation of the atomic bomb and nuking Japan in WWII and the fallout afterwards (in more ways than one). It’s dark, gritty. The main character is flawed. There’s a lot of politics and backstabbing. The movie covers a lot of moral grey areas, and it treats the audience like adults in that it lets the audience decide for themselves what’s moral or immoral.
This is a good personification of men. We’re flawed, we have to do all the work in the world while we simultaneously deal with bullshit and backstabbing. We have to make tough lose-lose decisions and live with the consequences. We are adults.
Now look at the Barbie movie. On the exterior it’s a lot of colorful colors and frills and cutesy flowers and dolls. But inside hides a grotesque, hateful monster. The Barbie movie was marketed as a “family friendly” kids movie, but it ended up being even more political than Oppenheimer. It has no message other than “men are literally evil” that it bashes in your head the whole screen time. It’s completely disjointed from reality (not the part where Barbie is just a toy, but the “real world” in the movie is portrayed as a patriarchy, when in reality we live in a gynocentric clown world). Nothing in it makes logical sense even if you ignored all the misandry. The women do all the desk work they call “real work”, while men fuck around and do nothing all day. So I suppose all the actual work like the bricklaying and the farming and oil drilling just gets done because of fucking magic?
This is a good personification of women. The cutesy pretty exterior belies a hideous monster that hates you and wants to see you killed or enslaved. Nothing makes any logical sense, there’s literally no basis in reality, and they think things just pop out of thin air.
Now you add in the fact, that the Barbie movie was more expensive to make. Quick search tells me Barbie was about $245 million with marketing, while Oppenheimer was about $180 million with marketing. Kind of like how women waste more money than men.
But also the fact that the Barbie movie made more money than Oppenheimer is a good reflection of soyciety. A misandrist wet dream outsold a gritty pseudo-documentary. Maybe the ticket sales will change once word of mouth is in play and everyone knows what the Barbie movie is about. But there are hundreds of millions of women who masturbate to their misandry, and the Barbie movie appeals to them. Oppenheimer of course sold well because it’s a solid movie. Which also is a good representation of reality; Barbie (the woman) just says “men are evil” and gets money thrown at, while Oppenheimer (the man) has to actually work and be good. But I foresee both continuing to do well because Barbie appeals to the inner misandry that lies in women.
Actually, Aaron clarey made a video about how Disney is collapsing because it didn’t hate white men enough, here. It was intended to be satirical in nature but apparently it’s literally real."
"For those who don’t pay attention to Pedowood (I don’t blame you, since 95% of Pedowood is worse than cancer), the Oppenheimer and Barbie movies came out recently at about the same time and both raked in good money, thus soyciety has sort of tied the two movies by the hip. The two movies also could not be more different. And it’s a good contrast between men and women.
Oppenheimer is about the creation of the atomic bomb and nuking Japan in WWII and the fallout afterwards (in more ways than one). It’s dark, gritty. The main character is flawed. There’s a lot of politics and backstabbing. The movie covers a lot of moral grey areas, and it treats the audience like adults in that it lets the audience decide for themselves what’s moral or immoral.
This is a good personification of men. We’re flawed, we have to do all the work in the world while we simultaneously deal with bullshit and backstabbing. We have to make tough lose-lose decisions and live with the consequences. We are adults.
Now look at the Barbie movie. On the exterior it’s a lot of colorful colors and frills and cutesy flowers and dolls. But inside hides a grotesque, hateful monster. The Barbie movie was marketed as a “family friendly” kids movie, but it ended up being even more political than Oppenheimer. It has no message other than “men are literally evil” that it bashes in your head the whole screen time. It’s completely disjointed from reality (not the part where Barbie is just a toy, but the “real world” in the movie is portrayed as a patriarchy, when in reality we live in a gynocentric clown world). Nothing in it makes logical sense even if you ignored all the misandry. The women do all the desk work they call “real work”, while men fuck around and do nothing all day. So I suppose all the actual work like the bricklaying and the farming and oil drilling just gets done because of fucking magic?
This is a good personification of women. The cutesy pretty exterior belies a hideous monster that hates you and wants to see you killed or enslaved. Nothing makes any logical sense, there’s literally no basis in reality, and they think things just pop out of thin air.
Now you add in the fact, that the Barbie movie was more expensive to make. Quick search tells me Barbie was about $245 million with marketing, while Oppenheimer was about $180 million with marketing. Kind of like how women waste more money than men.
But also the fact that the Barbie movie made more money than Oppenheimer is a good reflection of soyciety. A misandrist wet dream outsold a gritty pseudo-documentary. Maybe the ticket sales will change once word of mouth is in play and everyone knows what the Barbie movie is about. But there are hundreds of millions of women who masturbate to their misandry, and the Barbie movie appeals to them. Oppenheimer of course sold well because it’s a solid movie. Which also is a good representation of reality; Barbie (the woman) just says “men are evil” and gets money thrown at, while Oppenheimer (the man) has to actually work and be good. But I foresee both continuing to do well because Barbie appeals to the inner misandry that lies in women.
Actually, Aaron clarey made a video about how Disney is collapsing because it didn’t hate white men enough, here. It was intended to be satirical in nature but apparently it’s literally real."
, since they themselves are two-dimensional opportunists and hedonists.
