Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Nature makes no fucking sense. Why are men attracted to bad genes (as long as they are female)

Richard Coper

Richard Coper

involuntary celibate
★★★★
Joined
Jan 14, 2022
Posts
2,235
It's always said that, for evolutionary reasons, women are only attracted to the best genes. I'm a layman in science, but i keep hearing that the reason women have high standards for men is because of their nature. They are programmed to only accept the best genes, and nature itself is said to have engineered this so that evolutionary progress can take place by only allowing the best genes to reproduce. It sounds very plausible, i ain’t denying that, but i have one question!
Why doesn't that apply to men too?
Why would a tall, genetically high quality male be attracted to even a genetically inferior midget just because she is a female and her bad genes even are the main reason he finds her so cute? Wouldn't reproducing with this woman be a step backwards in evolution, at least for him? Nature has given the female gender the ability to distinguish good genes from bad ones, but not the male gender. Fucking why?
In nature, only the genetically best men have the opportunity to pass on their genes (because nature is so smart and shit), but all and i mean, all women without exception basically have the opportunity to pass on their genes, even if they are genetically inferior, which is expressed, for example, by an asymmetrical face or a very short height. illogical! This means that men are hindering the evolutionary process, but at the same time it’s not even their fault, since nature has programmed them to find bad genes attractive as long as those bad genes are female, causing the woman's bad genes to be carried further, which in turn is detrimental to the evolutionary process, because the child will not only have the fathers genes but also the genes of his mother. How do one want to answer that? It is either an error of nature who fucked itself by mistake or a prank by god.
 
Last edited:
Nature isfull of bs, thats why.
a prank by god.
or a punishment of god on women, to put them in a dilemma, submit to a man who doesnt arouse them, or burn for eternity

either way they will have to face agonizing, long lasting humiliation. It's only a matter of choice which one they choose.
 
thats called clown world.
 
Cope cuz genetic lottery... She can give birth to an GigaChad...or GigaStacy
 
It’s because men seek to spread their genes as much as possible so that’s why
 
Men are disperate sooo that's why, now you understand me?

Majority of men are disperate they are starving for affection....
 
Cope cuz genetic lottery... She can give birth to an GigaChad...or GigaStacy
In which universe can a ugly or short woman give birth to a giga Chad?
It’s because men seek to spread their genes as much as possible so that’s why
My [UWSL]Thread: Men seek to spread their genes as much as possible, why isn’t that a contradiction to evolution?[/UWSL]
Your answer: It’s because they want to spread their genes as much as possible.
Men are disperate sooo that's why, now you understand me?

Majority of men are disperate they are starving for affection....
You are answering something i didn’t say. My thread was about Chad and 3/10 women. Don’t tell me, Chad is starving for affection.
 
Last edited:
Women bear the burden of reproduction so nature made them pickier.
 
bad gene is defective, but when normies cant have sex then you know who to blame.
 
In which universe can a ugly or short woman give birth to a giga Chad?

My [UWSL]Thread: Men seek to spread their genes as much as possible and that is bad. [/UWSL]
Your answer: It’s because they want to spread their genes as much as possible.

You are answering something i didn’t say. My thread was about Chad and 3/10 women. Don’t tell me, Chad is starving for affection.
Ohh.. :feelskek:
Cuz Those are retarded :feelskek: and ofc they want the divination and security that her woman would won't cheat and also they want a wify and stacy are not wifys
 
In which universe can a ugly or short woman give birth to a giga Chad?

My [UWSL]Thread: Men seek to spread their genes as much as possible, why isn’t that a contradiction to evolution?[/UWSL]
Your answer: It’s because they want to spread their genes as much as possible.

You are answering something i didn’t say. My thread was about Chad and 3/10 women. Don’t tell me, Chad is starving for affection.
Your thread: Why are men not like women when selecting genes
My answer: They want to spread their genes as much as possible
 
Your thread: Why are men not like women when selecting genes
My answer: They want to spread their genes as much as possible
You only read the title, not the text
 
It's always said that, for evolutionary reasons, women are only attracted to the best genes. I'm a layman in science, but i keep hearing that the reason women have high standards for men is because of their nature. They are programmed to only accept the best genes, and nature itself is said to have engineered this so that evolutionary progress can take place by only allowing the best genes to reproduce. It sounds very plausible, i ain’t denying that, but i have one question!
Why doesn't that apply to men too?
Why would a tall, genetically high quality male be attracted to even a genetically inferior midget just because she is a female and her bad genes even are the main reason he finds her so cute? Wouldn't reproducing with this woman be a step backwards in evolution, at least for him? Nature has given the female gender the ability to distinguish good genes from bad ones, but not the male gender. Fucking why?
In nature, only the genetically best men have the opportunity to pass on their genes (because nature is so smart and shit), but all and i mean, all women without exception basically have the opportunity to pass on their genes, even if they are genetically inferior, which is expressed, for example, by an asymmetrical face or a very short height. illogical! This means that men are hindering the evolutionary process, but at the same time it’s not even their fault, since nature has programmed them to find bad genes attractive as long as those bad genes are female, causing the woman's bad genes to be carried further, which in turn is detrimental to the evolutionary process, because the child will not only have the fathers genes but also the genes of his mother. How do one want to answer that? It is either an error of nature who fucked itself by mistake or a prank by god.
I agree. My mother is an autistic midget hence I got her genes. My dad is a normie-tier kike. If I got rich. I un-ironically would choose the TALLEST most HIGH-T/MUSCULAR looking sheboon I could find to be my surrogate and bear my 6'5 Tyrone mulatto son. Look at all the NBA guys, they were born from TALL women! (Shaq O'Neil's mother was 6'5)! Since I would be rich I could pay her to carry my kid and impregnate her in-vitro without me actually having to fuck that beast! (then of course I would geo-maxx and fuck a legal escort on the side but not have a kid with her).

-un-ironically we are dysgenic due to WEAK FEMININE women. (in nature their is NO BENEFIT being weak/retarded. LOOK IT UP! Anceint pre-historic women were as strong as olympic athletes!) Ironically nigs, got it right. breed with the BIGGEST/STRONGEST/HIGH-T women because your SONS will be Tyrones as a result
 
In our society, a petite 4'11 White foid with BPD is more valuable in the eyes of two disabled Black males simply because her docile nature and European genes make her a supposedly-viable candidate for homemaking.
 
It's always said that, for evolutionary reasons, women are only attracted to the best genes. I'm a layman in science, but i keep hearing that the reason women have high standards for men is because of their nature. They are programmed to only accept the best genes, and nature itself is said to have engineered this so that evolutionary progress can take place by only allowing the best genes to reproduce. It sounds very plausible, i ain’t denying that, but i have one question!
Why doesn't that apply to men too?
Why would a tall, genetically high quality male be attracted to even a genetically inferior midget just because she is a female and her bad genes even are the main reason he finds her so cute? Wouldn't reproducing with this woman be a step backwards in evolution, at least for him? Nature has given the female gender the ability to distinguish good genes from bad ones, but not the male gender. Fucking why?
In nature, only the genetically best men have the opportunity to pass on their genes (because nature is so smart and shit), but all and i mean, all women without exception basically have the opportunity to pass on their genes, even if they are genetically inferior, which is expressed, for example, by an asymmetrical face or a very short height. illogical! This means that men are hindering the evolutionary process, but at the same time it’s not even their fault, since nature has programmed them to find bad genes attractive as long as those bad genes are female, causing the woman's bad genes to be carried further, which in turn is detrimental to the evolutionary process, because the child will not only have the fathers genes but also the genes of his mother. How do one want to answer that? It is either an error of nature who fucked itself by mistake or a prank by god.
First of all, nature does not try to make the PERFECT LIVING BEING, when you create an Apex Predator, it will probably destroy itself, that happened with the Megalodons, we are not fish, but you get me.

Also, it's not that we as men, want bad genes, is that we have different requirements?
Human men mostly want to pass on their genes, even if they're bad or even if the progenitor's genes are bad too.

And also education, we are educated to treat women as if they were important, and, probably regarding education, it could also be, "biological value", I know that's not the word, but, 100 men and a 1 woman can't repopulate something, but a man and 100 woman, probably will have problems with endogamy, but after 2-4 generations it should be solved.

I think I lost what I was saying, but yeah, we as men, only want to pass on our genes, it doesn't matter the specs, so having a more flexible min requirements, it makes us even liking deffects, also, bigger is not always the best, there's gigantism and gigantomastia, that can give a fuckton of problems.

:feelsautistic:
 
Why would a tall, genetically high quality male be attracted to even a genetically inferior midget just because she is a female and her bad genes even are the main reason he finds her so cute?
They balance/normalize each others exceptional features out. That way people aren't all 7'5 lanklet freaks.
 
Last edited:
Most effective way to get any genes to survive:feelsjuice:
First of all, nature does not try to make the PERFECT LIVING BEING, when you create an Apex Predator, it will probably destroy itself, that happened with the Megalodons, we are not fish, but you get me.

Also, it's not that we as men, want bad genes, is that we have different requirements?
Human men mostly want to pass on their genes, even if they're bad or even if the progenitor's genes are bad too.

And also education, we are educated to treat women as if they were important, and, probably regarding education, it could also be, "biological value", I know that's not the word, but, 100 men and a 1 woman can't repopulate something, but a man and 100 woman, probably will have problems with endogamy, but after 2-4 generations it should be solved.

I think I lost what I was saying, but yeah, we as men, only want to pass on our genes, it doesn't matter the specs, so having a more flexible min requirements, it makes us even liking deffects, also, bigger is not always the best, there's gigantism and gigantomastia, that can give a fuckton of problems.

:feelsautistic:
 
according to these notes, in americas basement the reason why life and the universe is so cucked fucked is because of the mulitverse nations, they gave our god a curse, that everything he makes will in fact fail and eventually entropy, he cant control the hell chamber he made, becaus ethe multiverse saw him as a bratty child that couldnt do anything right, we are the subjects of Chuck, that is what is in americas basement:feelsbadman:
 
Not me tbh, I've always been attracted to tall and slim women the most, but it's just as you said;
Only chads can reproduce to begin with, and they make some of the most retarded decisions I've seen
 
It's always said that, for evolutionary reasons, women are only attracted to the best genes. I'm a layman in science, but i keep hearing that the reason women have high standards for men is because of their nature. They are programmed to only accept the best genes, and nature itself is said to have engineered this so that evolutionary progress can take place by only allowing the best genes to reproduce. It sounds very plausible, i ain’t denying that, but i have one question!
Why doesn't that apply to men too?
Why would a tall, genetically high quality male be attracted to even a genetically inferior midget just because she is a female and her bad genes even are the main reason he finds her so cute? Wouldn't reproducing with this woman be a step backwards in evolution, at least for him? Nature has given the female gender the ability to distinguish good genes from bad ones, but not the male gender. Fucking why?
In nature, only the genetically best men have the opportunity to pass on their genes (because nature is so smart and shit), but all and i mean, all women without exception basically have the opportunity to pass on their genes, even if they are genetically inferior, which is expressed, for example, by an asymmetrical face or a very short height. illogical! This means that men are hindering the evolutionary process, but at the same time it’s not even their fault, since nature has programmed them to find bad genes attractive as long as those bad genes are female, causing the woman's bad genes to be carried further, which in turn is detrimental to the evolutionary process, because the child will not only have the fathers genes but also the genes of his mother. How do one want to answer that? It is either an error of nature who fucked itself by mistake or a prank by god.
Have you noticed that the biological children of a couple almost always tend to take on more features of the father? Even the foidlets (feminized versions of the father). This must be nature’s way of ensuring the father’s genes are present in the children and the children aren’t some other guy’s his wife fucked while preggers. Fathers are given birth certificates by Nature.

The foid claims ownership of the children through pregnancy (very visible) and nurturing them. And since nature has decided children who take on physical attributes of the father will ensure non cuckholdery to the father, that in turn makes foids become more selective in their mate picking, so the children will inherit good physical features (which also is an indicator of good health. Good health = fertility). If foid doesn’t have contact with physically fit males, she’ll turn to the second best option which is a male who is smart and skilled enough to safeguard her during her pregnancy and can provide for the resulting family.
Foids are less logical, stronger (mentally and physically), and governed by strong emotions — men are naturally receptive to these childish outbursts (after all we’re sexually attracted to certain levels of neotony in foids) and since we had to protect the children that were under foids’ care 24/7 we had to ensure the foids were content to ensure they will maximize their child rearing and not chimp out and shake the baby to death. But we don’t live in caveman eras anymore. Men who are oblivious to this, blindly follow their natural urges and simp for foids who are already comfortable and safe. Foid becomes spoiled and cries for more gibs.
Foids always had sexual advantages over men at least in terms of attraction. How many foids do you know of that orgasms to dick pics/male body parts without a face attached? Compare to the gorillions of men jerking it to boob and ass pics of foids without ever needing a foid face to go along with these body parts — it is clear from this phenomenon that attraction to a foid does not necessarily equate appreciation for her beauty. Unless she is hideous and deformed/obese she will always have hordes of coomers jerking it to her while barely glancing at her face. Remember that — FOIDS ARE CUM MAGNETS THEY RARELY POSSESS ACTUAL PHYSICAL BEAUTY OR CHARM. THEY JUST WANT YOU TO CUM. THATS WHAT THEYRE MEANT FOR.
In short, nature is based from one angle because it makes foids about as successful as passing their physical looks as they are at passing down their surnames. Nature hates 50% of its human creations so much that it wants no foid to leave her legacy behind whether it be achievement, genes, even a name.
Incels have the final laugh over foids as their pathetic whorish memories are gradually wiped from existence while incels struggle on and leave visible footprints in whatever we choose to engage in. Even in Roblox our genetics will show itself in the faces of the future generation if we choose to do the gRape (Again, in roblox I confirm) :feelsLSD:
 
Woman don’t even choose the best genes sometimes
 
to do the deed and spread the seed

if men were picky they wouldnt get to spread their seed as far and wide but if women were not picky they wouldnt get the best possible mate
 
It's always said that, for evolutionary reasons, women are only attracted to the best genes. I'm a layman in science, but i keep hearing that the reason women have high standards for men is because of their nature. They are programmed to only accept the best genes, and nature itself is said to have engineered this so that evolutionary progress can take place by only allowing the best genes to reproduce. It sounds very plausible, i ain’t denying that, but i have one question!
Why doesn't that apply to men too?
Why would a tall, genetically high quality male be attracted to even a genetically inferior midget just because she is a female and her bad genes even are the main reason he finds her so cute? Wouldn't reproducing with this woman be a step backwards in evolution, at least for him? Nature has given the female gender the ability to distinguish good genes from bad ones, but not the male gender. Fucking why?
In nature, only the genetically best men have the opportunity to pass on their genes (because nature is so smart and shit), but all and i mean, all women without exception basically have the opportunity to pass on their genes, even if they are genetically inferior, which is expressed, for example, by an asymmetrical face or a very short height. illogical! This means that men are hindering the evolutionary process, but at the same time it’s not even their fault, since nature has programmed them to find bad genes attractive as long as those bad genes are female, causing the woman's bad genes to be carried further, which in turn is detrimental to the evolutionary process, because the child will not only have the fathers genes but also the genes of his mother. How do one want to answer that? It is either an error of nature who fucked itself by mistake or a prank by god.
It’s because men can fuck everything, and the results will speak for themselves. The ones that are well off will thrive, the failures will rot and die out. It’s a better strategy than to be choosy, and then end up getting cucked and raising another dude’s kid.
 
Because it's literally chaos - it's an order of disorder
 
I've seen it. In my past life. I'm in the timeline where things must play out or else the same things will keep happening over and over again
 

Similar threads

MisfitPerson
Replies
4
Views
110
Top Red Garnacho
Top Red Garnacho
AngryUbermensch
Replies
29
Views
600
Slut_Annihilator298
Slut_Annihilator298
Zer0/∞
Replies
33
Views
945
Uncle Death
Uncle Death
C
Replies
5
Views
270
Arnocel
Arnocel
ForeverGrey
Replies
38
Views
706
failednormie_
failednormie_

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top