FUCKING THIS. "White nationalists, tradcucks and neonazis are the most persistent in trying to hijack men's rights for only white men that are attractive to women."
Those pieces of shit destroyed all the progress the men's rights movement made from 2013 to 2015 and it got absorbed into the racetard right. I watched all of it melt away. I don't hate the alt-right/wignats/stormfronters because they're "racist" or whatever, I hate them because they destroyed the men's rights movement.
They are understandably desperate to make inroads politically since whites will soon be a minority in many countries so they'll hijack any group that seems to be majority male to try and refocus it to their ends while booting everyone out.
Another thing that destroyed the men's rights movement was acceptance of male disposability.
Think about it. If you accept that men are biologically disposable, why fight for men's rights at all?
Subs like the r/theredpill preemptively declaring that men's rights was a dead end because men are naturally expendable didn't help either.
Given that sub was started by a republican, it could very well be controlled opposition.
It is important to know this: the arguments arguing that men are completely disposable compared to women don't add up.
First: while men on average are stronger than women, not all men are and yet in the event of war even very weak males are drafted onto the battlefield to die whereas physically stronger women stay safely out of the combat zone unless they decide to go themselves.
Second: "sperm are expensive, eggs are cheap" is not likely the original reason for drafting men in war, but for the reason that men
on average are better able to fight wars and engage in combat than women.
The "sperm are expensive, eggs are cheap" argument came from or at least was heavily popularized in the manosphere by PUA turned white nationalist Roissy/Chateau Heartiste that looked down on low status unattractive males and frequently advocated them "manning up and becoming more alpha" or perishing because he believed that was the natural order of things.
That feminists on reddit quickly adopted this argument is telling to the more eugenicist and discriminatory aspects of feminism and feminist advocacy for women's issues at the expense of men.
Don't forget that a population that is 99% women and 1% men (since it's argued by male disposability proponents that the opposite results in death of a tribe) would grow inbred over time and die out from accumulated genetic defects just like many mammals like mammoths might have in the past.
Third: If women are important from sparing from war because women need to give birth to the next generation, why are post menopausal women that can't have kids exempt from the draft while older men their age still technically required to be drafted in an extreme situation like WW II?
Never easily accept the argument that men are biologically disposable because it has many holes in the theory and has been advocated by people that don't have low status unattractive male's interests at heart like tradcuck alt-right and feminists that let their Darwinist biased outlook slip.
It was easier to brainwash men back then and manipulate their egos because there were a lot less incels back then, and no internet where they can learn to be uncucked from online forums.
A lot of the laws are gynocentric that were voted on by cucks and whores, we don't have to follow them. I agree there are lots of non-violent solutions, but we still need to be ready to fight in case something goes wrong.
Which is why the internet is both a blessing a curse.
And with regards to non-violent solutions you have to keep in mind that the quickest way to get cracked down on by the feds is to start advocating for violence even in self defense. That's why in order to smear MRAs a lot of feminists like to leave false posts painting them as violent.
Don't forget also that there are naturally pacifists and non-violent people among us who shouldn't have to compromise their principles. Not everyone is a warrior. There are warriors and then there are scholars. To each to their own and the best strategy not to alienate them is to let them play to their strengths in their comfort zone.
en.wikipedia.org
