El Enemigo
Overlord
★★★★★
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2021
- Posts
- 6,740
I no longer see them as equals, but not necessarily as inferiors.
They can work and do similar things to men so by this principle many think they are equals but they forget the inherent value women have. You could even say men have no value at all because men are not born with inherent value so this destroys the equality argument easily.
Men and women are not equal, their dynamics in society are not the same.
I see women to an entity more similar to pets, you have to respect them, love them, etc. But you always know you are above them and you are not tied to them, hence why the current situation makes sense with this theory, one man having many women, or one woman having various masters that feed her jfl.
What do you think? This idea is not perfected yet, but this could explain why I can't fathom the theory of marriage or why many women are ok with sharing chads.
Tldr: women and men relationships have a similar dynamic to pets and master, a man should never tie himself to a woman because it's cucked.
They can work and do similar things to men so by this principle many think they are equals but they forget the inherent value women have. You could even say men have no value at all because men are not born with inherent value so this destroys the equality argument easily.
Men and women are not equal, their dynamics in society are not the same.
I see women to an entity more similar to pets, you have to respect them, love them, etc. But you always know you are above them and you are not tied to them, hence why the current situation makes sense with this theory, one man having many women, or one woman having various masters that feed her jfl.
What do you think? This idea is not perfected yet, but this could explain why I can't fathom the theory of marriage or why many women are ok with sharing chads.
Tldr: women and men relationships have a similar dynamic to pets and master, a man should never tie himself to a woman because it's cucked.