P
Personalityinkwell
mentally crippled by lonely teen years
-
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2019
- Posts
- 38,923
So in the past I've been accused of defending "fakecels" and causing controversy. Not my intention. Essentially it all comes down to this forum's disagreement about what a fakecel or incel is.
Here is my new opinion. and it's quite simple, by @Joelossus:
IF YOU'VE EVER HAD SEX WITH A NON HOOKER, YOU'RE NOT INCEL
Now it seems obvious, but there was confusion because of that stupid six months rule, in cases such as @Weed. Then of course this forum said "maybe not six months, but should be several years". If that's the case, you are NEARCEL, in that, you're not incel, although you are close.
The hierarchy is this:
Gigachad>Chad>Chadlite>Normie>Nearcel>Incel>Truecel
In many ways, nearcels can relate to incels in terms of being low value men
BUT THEY AREN'T INCELS.
If a nearcel posts here, and then mentions his non hooker lay, FUCK HIM, HE NEEDS TO BE BANNED ASAP.
That's my opinion. Thoughts?
Here is my new opinion. and it's quite simple, by @Joelossus:
IF YOU'VE EVER HAD SEX WITH A NON HOOKER, YOU'RE NOT INCEL
Now it seems obvious, but there was confusion because of that stupid six months rule, in cases such as @Weed. Then of course this forum said "maybe not six months, but should be several years". If that's the case, you are NEARCEL, in that, you're not incel, although you are close.
The hierarchy is this:
Gigachad>Chad>Chadlite>Normie>Nearcel>Incel>Truecel
In many ways, nearcels can relate to incels in terms of being low value men
BUT THEY AREN'T INCELS.
If a nearcel posts here, and then mentions his non hooker lay, FUCK HIM, HE NEEDS TO BE BANNED ASAP.
That's my opinion. Thoughts?