Just thinking that things like such objectifies and generalizes women, which they always accuse us to do.
Look at the sentence. "My ugly friend gets hot girls so can you". When people, or bluepillers say that, they objectify the women the so called "ugly friend" as mere hot meats who are objects that men can obtain, if they are confident, hardworking or any bullshit they always say. Where in other advices they say at the same time "women are people. They have interests and personality". It's like they give confusing image of how we should feel about women. Hot meats that we can slay if we're an alpha male and more confident, or humans that we can love if we pound our personality better so they love us back.
Not only objectifying, arguments like such also generalize women, particularly the "hot girls" they're mentioning. Again, they think if we're confident, kind, compassionate, we can get hot girls. Always the same kind of advices. But at some times, for example when manlets get raped by heightpill and sad about it, they always say some, not all girls prefer tall guys. It's just personal preferences. They don't like the same thing. They have different tastes. But why we get the same kind of advices like being charming, alpha, etc?
Would also want to say what I feel as generalizing in other similar advices. "My ugly friend is dating (not slaying) a hot girl". Why would they just refer to the friend as "ugly friend" and the girl as "hot girl"? And why do they think if the ugly friend can get a hot girl, so can we? Say Gilbert is the ugly friend and Ashley is the hot girl. Now change the sentence and treat them like unique human beings. "If Gilbert can date Ashley, so can you". Doesn't sound right. Say Gilbert now is attributed with good bluepilled traits like confident and interesting by them, to show that those are what we need to get hot girls. In that case, being confident and interesting like Gilbert isn't the way to date a hot girl, it's what it takes to date Ashley. It's not applicable to other hot girls.
Pretty much those are what I start to think about. Surely I know women like the same thing and like to be objectifies by chads. But I don't expect bluepillers contradict their own advices once or twice with their other advices
Look at the sentence. "My ugly friend gets hot girls so can you". When people, or bluepillers say that, they objectify the women the so called "ugly friend" as mere hot meats who are objects that men can obtain, if they are confident, hardworking or any bullshit they always say. Where in other advices they say at the same time "women are people. They have interests and personality". It's like they give confusing image of how we should feel about women. Hot meats that we can slay if we're an alpha male and more confident, or humans that we can love if we pound our personality better so they love us back.
Not only objectifying, arguments like such also generalize women, particularly the "hot girls" they're mentioning. Again, they think if we're confident, kind, compassionate, we can get hot girls. Always the same kind of advices. But at some times, for example when manlets get raped by heightpill and sad about it, they always say some, not all girls prefer tall guys. It's just personal preferences. They don't like the same thing. They have different tastes. But why we get the same kind of advices like being charming, alpha, etc?
Would also want to say what I feel as generalizing in other similar advices. "My ugly friend is dating (not slaying) a hot girl". Why would they just refer to the friend as "ugly friend" and the girl as "hot girl"? And why do they think if the ugly friend can get a hot girl, so can we? Say Gilbert is the ugly friend and Ashley is the hot girl. Now change the sentence and treat them like unique human beings. "If Gilbert can date Ashley, so can you". Doesn't sound right. Say Gilbert now is attributed with good bluepilled traits like confident and interesting by them, to show that those are what we need to get hot girls. In that case, being confident and interesting like Gilbert isn't the way to date a hot girl, it's what it takes to date Ashley. It's not applicable to other hot girls.
Pretty much those are what I start to think about. Surely I know women like the same thing and like to be objectifies by chads. But I don't expect bluepillers contradict their own advices once or twice with their other advices
