I look at my younger self and I'm baffled by how I used to consider most women as equal human beings. So few of them seem to actually have souls and unique personalities. Has anyone else noticed most women in a certain group are basically just carbon copies of each other? For example, when I was in college, I'd see sorority girls all the time in groups. The way they all acted, looked, and dressed, it was basically like they were all interchangeable. They all wore slutty clothing, took retarded selfies making duck lips and sticking their tongues out, enjoyed getting drunk and acting like literal children, gossiped, had hobbies of shopping, candles, makeup, and spending way too much money on dumb shit like pedicures or eyebrow waxing. They're all the exact same fucking person.
As someone who is a Unicel in Shitmerica, I can confirm that his descriptions of sorority whores is spot on: Oftentimes, many of them tend to look like they actually are sisters by blood, and not in the metaphorical sense. I think I was once told by an acquaintance, that they literally recruit for foids who look like them, and after this I noticed just how carbon-copied they all were in both appearance & personality.
I will have to give this a thorough read at some point, since it seems quite useful information for a potential thread:
Females tend to excel in verbal abilities
Ah, who could have guessed: Foids excel where lying, manipulation, and the like comes into play.
Hence, overall, there are no sex differences in IQ scores for the most commonly used tests. Thus, we cannot turn to standardized intelligence tests to determine if there is a “smarter sex.”
In a way, this could be true: However, as you & many others on this site have discerned by showing the distribution of scores, it clearly indicates that one gender has a much more stronger potential for being higher IQ, as well as has more outliers from the norm.
A 2016 study by Baye and Monseur found that on average, boys showed 14% greater variance than girls in science, reading, and math test scores and concluded with:
Some would try & utilize this in order to push a narrative along the lines of "
: This proves wahmen are smarter than men!1!1!" No, all it proves is that males have more divergent patterns of thinking, as well as an ability to "think outside of the box"so to speak.
Basically due to foid's extremely high standards throughout history and them outbreeding unattractive men led to greater male variability.
Since no such selective pressures were applied to women, they were essentially guaranteed to breed the day they were born, that's why foids have zero distinguishing characters or traits, that's why they all feel like carbon copies of one another.
Good thread.
Another reason which just occurred to me, is the fact that males typically had more professions, roles, tasks, etc. throughout history. Foids were either housewives, assisted with menial tasks on a farm, or were whores: Males, on the other hand, undertook virtually every task needed to maintain any civilization -warriors, priests, scholars, leaders, architects, farmers, sailors, merchants, etc- which of course, would have required for them to develop more adaptability under circumstances.
- compared to men, most women live MUCH easier life. In one report from the US, they found that 1 in 5 men will not reach the age of 50 - by the time both genders reach 80, only half of the men are still alive, compared to 80% of the women
I never heard of this stat till now: However, it seems to check-out well.
Think of all the jobs that males do which naturally, are much more challenging, dangerous, etc.
- women are the only gender with a giga in-group preference, 4.5. times higher than males, who essentially have none
Not only this, but males literally view foids as a collective in a much more favorable light as opposed to their own gender:
In 1989, 203 psychology students of
Purdue University were given questionnaires in groups of 20 and asked to assess subjects of both genders, which showed a more favourable attitude to women and female stereotypes
In 1991, 324 psychology students of Purdue University were given questionnaires in groups of 20 and asked to assess subjects of both genders. They evaluated the social categories of men and women, relating the traits and expectations of each gender through interviews, emotion-associations and free-response measures. Women were rated higher in attitudes and beliefs but not emotions
en.wikipedia.org
@DarkStarDown maybe interesting to you since you recently seem to have picked up an interest about in-group bias and how similar women are to each other.
Will save these sources, thank you for this info.
I have observed that women have brain-farts when it comes to high-stakes situations. If there is danger or a risk of having to be responsible, foids usually start looking around for someone else to make a move (usually a guy). If nobody does anything, they start crying or screaming.
Have you ever seen this phenomenon, where nothing happens but like a foid in the crowd randomly starts screaming?
They always fucking scream.
I've seen
countless examples of this on social media throughout the years, as well as irl.
Unsurprising. I've seen a study which tried to claim that women are the gender facing worse evolutionary pressure because pregnancies could be quite dangerous before the advent of modern medicine
.
So they chose to nitpick that, and completely disregarded the literal fact of the matter, which can easily be discerned by paying attention in fucking middle school history class, that males were always the ones to go off to war, do the manual labor, etc. ?
Yeah, absolute state of modern "
Science"
Thankfully, not all scientists are as cucked:
Male animals are subject to stronger selection pressures than females, which may allow populations to adapt to environmental change more efficiently.
www.sciencedaily.com
Females are the choosier sex, males face greater evolutionary pressure, and due to those facts and more, attractive females are the only group of people who consistently get exactly who and what they want on the dating/marriage market:
@tehgymcel420 @Gymcelled @Copexodius Maximus @Incline https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-62781-7 Abstract Early exposure to parental features shapes later sexual preferences in fish, birds, and mammals. Here I report that human males’ preferences for a conspicuous trait, colourful...
incels.is
Noted.
