View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/comments/1ut4cpr/orgasm_means_concent_so_women_want_to_be_raped/
First of all, I'm extremely grateful to be awarded this badge of honor: pissing off men-bashing losers to the point where they repost me on their subreddit
I'll be responding to the top comments of the post.
Here we go.
"Concent" is a barrier that women (and their simps) put up to filter out the men who they're actually attracted to; it's a litmus test to find the men that women actually desire (the 70 IQ morally corrupt degenerates who don't take no for an answer).
You also fail to realize that the orgasm IS the consent; pleasure puts your idea of "consent" out of the question. It's a status indicator for men, too.
If you're so concerned about "muh concent", maybe start with the guys women are actually enjoying sex with.
Has my post disproven this fact at all? We're not the ones who're going out raping and assaulting women, those are the men who women deem "high-status".
Despite your strawman arguments using mass shooters as a way to demonize us, we're very tame compared to other male demographics in society: https://labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/files/2023/07/Whyisnttheremoreincelviolence.pdf
A woman is actually more likely to be assaulted and/or murdered by someone she is having/has had sex with than a lonely, affectionless man: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-43128350
These are not equivalent to an orgasm AT ALL.
Neither vomiting or diarrhea are pleasant experiences: orgasms are. Every person enjoys orgasms. Plus, there needs to be a buildup of prolonged pleasure for orgasms to occur, which means they would have to find is pleasurable in the first place... which means they like it, retard.
What does this even mean?
Evidently not. I've just shown that they have a better, more pleasurable experience from "non-consensual" sex than "consensual".
They clearly get off on a man having their way with them. Just another way to filtering out the kinds of men they actually want sex from.
If a man has his way with a woman, and the woman enjoys it, of what use was the "consent" in any hypothetical situation?
Both parties enjoyed themselves; Isn't that what it all about at the end of the day?
You think you're pushing this noble cause of eugenics in order to have humans be better and smarter in the long rub, when we're probably WAY fucking smarter than any man that any woman on IT has ever slept with.
Of course, it's really about intelligence though, is it? Or "muh genetics" for that matter No, it's about the absolving of responsibility; the "freedom" to fuck any man you desire, regardless of how it impacts society, regardless of how t impacts humanity, all under the guise of improving the "gene pool".
Your female selection is not eugenic in any form, retard. If this trajectory persists, it will literally kills us.
Women get off on non-consent/non-kindness, we've already established this.
Women evolved orgasms as status indicators for men who fuck them.
"Avoid injury"? Women fucking love injury, actually: https://incels.is/threads/women-gai...-the-pain-that-is-inflicted-upon-them.254271/
My brother in shaitan, women literally buy 12 inch (even BIGGER) dildos) to get themselves off.
Anyways, Who said anything about pornos? Women are stimulating THEMSELVES like this, and ask other men to do so; it's highly reminiscent of a violent assault.
If a man were to actually fuck her the way she gets herself off, it would be violent. But they like that. That's my whole point.
I don't see why us ranking low in the gynocentric-sexual hierarchy disqualifies us from talking about what gets women off. We're a community that has immense knowledge on human nature, we know how things work better than you do.
Also if we're using this "low-status voids talking points" argument, I guess the likes of marxists and communists are invalidated for wanting change in their capitalists societies, since their not high-ranking billionaires.
A man cannot truly be raped. It is in a man's nature to seek out pleasure and enjoy it. And the ones who orgasm during anal rape are most likely gay, or at least deeply closeted.
That's because you can't "add terror" to your sex, it has to happen by itself, via an assailant. Either that, or you don't find your partner attractive.
I literally SHOWED you articles saying that women in fact like it violent and rough. Again, who said anything about pornos?
... the average man.
You're talking about the average man. The average man is up against violent neanderthals who have no morals. That's not our fault.
I didn't rephrase the study, I directly quoted it numerous times.
The studies showed that a minority of women orgasm during consensual sex, and the ones who do will use aggressive stimulation to orgasm. Pay attention to that stimulation; what is it indicative of? What does it invoke?
No, you moron, you have it completely backwards. The ones that want to rape aren't even justifying it, their just doing it.
I'm merely showing that women orgasm a lot more in violent, non-consensual environments than otherwise.
Also, what the fuck are you on about? Sex is all about physical input, and RESPONDING to that physical input. They orgasmed, so they enjoyed it. That's the pinnacle of intercourse.
What if you enjoyed the "bad" chicken though? What if you had a pleasurable, physiological response to consuming this "bad" chicken?
What if your body rewards you, over and over, when you have this "bad" chicken? Is it really bad, then?
Anyways, sorry for the huge wall of text. I cannot wait to see their response.
Come and get me
