
Rabbi Schneerson
#Eugenics Central intelligence Agency
-
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2022
- Posts
- 9,689
Last edited:
I ain't clicking that
I ain't clicking that
I ain't clicking that
Why so many niggers?
Check it out it’s just a photoI ain't clicking that
I was thinking about that earlier actually I’ll move him down one
much betterI was thinking about that earlier actually I’ll move him down one
I’m trying to make one for women but I need like 400ish pictures and I only have 140 so farmuch better
tag me when you doI’m trying to make one for women but I need like 400ish pictures and I only have 140 so far
Where should he place I keep changing some people around and adding people some peoples faces look a bit less attractive than others despite being god level attractiveElordi should definitively be higher.
you are delusional and mentally retarded, sorry brothER
Say something and make a suggestion instead of hurling an insult without mentioning the issueyou are delusional and mentally retarded, sorry brothER
delusional looksfags.org tier scale. at the same time some of the people should be way higher than they are on your scale and some way lower. delusion in every waySay something and make a suggestion instead of hurling an insult without mentioning the issue
Say something and make a suggestion instead of hurling an insult without mentioning the issue
Name them idiot or circle them and show medelusional looksfags.org tier scale. at the same time some of the people should be way higher than they are on your scale and some way lower. delusion in every way
You’re right see this wasn’t hard now where should they be, I’m human being I’m not perfectView attachment 1363613
View attachment 1363614
you put them in the same category, do i need to say more?
I just moved beanie down a tierView attachment 1363613
View attachment 1363614
you put them in the same category, do i need to say more?
how are these 2 "conventionally high" ? :You’re right see this wasn’t hard now where should they be, I’m human being I’m not perfect
Tiny bits of attraction determines there placement if you feel they deserve to be higher or lower let me know again I’m not perfecthow are these 2 "conventionally high" ? :
View attachment 1363615
and what is the difference between "above average low " and "conventionally high"?
too many tiers anyway, nobody thinks like this. people usually place you into one of 3-4 categories depending on how severe the tunnel vision is: ugly, average (nothing special), handsome, very handsome. especially women, for them there is 3 categories, 3 tiers at best.I just moved beanie down a tier
It’s really hard to pinpoint once you get higher up and again it’s based off the attraction in the facehow are these 2 "conventionally high" ? :
View attachment 1363615
and what is the difference between "above average low " and "conventionally high"?
Yes correct but since I’m an incel and free time why not go into every level of attraction it’s simply for fun I don’t care if anyone thinks like it or likes it . It’s fun to metoo many tiers anyway, nobody thinks like this. people usually place you into one of 3-4 categories depending on how severe the tunnel vision is: ugly, average (nothing special), handsome, very handsome. especially women, for them there is 3 categories, 3 tiers at best.
It’s just for fun there are a ton of levels of attraction so I came with these but you are correct and I don’t care I like doing it so I’m gonna analysis every bit down to a t and place them where I feel they need to go I don’t care who likes it if it’s wrong I’ll change ittoo many tiers anyway, nobody thinks like this. people usually place you into one of 3-4 categories depending on how severe the tunnel vision is: ugly, average (nothing special), handsome, very handsome. especially women, for them there is 3 categories, 3 tiers at best.
Because it’s different levels to attraction and you can easily see if someone looks better than someone even if they’re both attractive so I came up with more names and again it’s for fun because I have timeyou have these tiers : cute high, cute low etc. what is the point of those. people shown in the corresponding photos just like any others are either attractive or not attractive. "cute" doesnt possess a lot of meaning when it comes to defining attraction, especially for men. If you meant high harmony, prevalent feminine facial features then should have called them "prettyboy type". not that they are very handsome, but if they have a looks type then it is more or less prettyboy.
i can see why you decided to call them cute but if i were you i would rename it to something like "prettyboy type low" etc. idkBecause it’s different levels to attraction and you can easily see if someone looks better than someone even if they’re both attractive so I came up with more names and again it’s for fun because I have time
i can see why you decided to call them cute but if i were you i would rename it to something like "prettyboy type low" etc. idk
pretty boy type- masculine , pretty boy - cute. further could also specify by giving them tiers of attraction e.g. "pretty boy type - cute (low)" "prettyboy type - masculine (high)"View attachment 1363624View attachment 1363625But if the cap dude is more attractive than the dreads dude and they’re both pretty boys now what ? This is why I came up with the extra names you can easily see if someone looks better than another person in a lot of cases some people may be cute low and because that level of attraction is so low some people may not even consider those people attractive at all.
Do you want to make 16 new names I’m not gonna change they names if I can’t change all of them and with the current name I have them memorized and it’s easier for me to understandpretty boy type- masculine , pretty boy - cute. further could also specify by giving them tiers of attraction e.g. "pretty boy type - cute (low)" "prettyboy type - masculine (high)"
2nd or at least 3rd tier. He's good looking and tall.Where should he place I keep changing some people around and adding people some peoples faces look a bit less attractive than others despite being god level attractive
You’re saying elordi should be at model ??2nd or at least 3rd tier. He's good looking and tall.
https://pin.it/7iLjRSAyl Updatedpretty boy type- masculine , pretty boy - cute. further could also specify by giving them tiers of attraction e.g. "pretty boy type - cute (low)" "prettyboy type - masculine (high)"
YepYou’re saying elordi should be at model ??
Averagewhat would you rate her?
View attachment 1363640
I ain't clicking that
I think Elordi looks better.View attachment 1363643View attachment 1363644 Who looks better , you’re saying elordi should be higher than this man
You ded srs I don’t bro I don’t see the attractionI think Elordi looks better.