Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

My rating scale

  • Thread starter Rabbi Schneerson
  • Start date
I ain't clicking that
 
Why so many niggers?
 
Why so many niggers?

Initially I was only gonna do black dudes but I realized that it doesn’t make sense so I’m working on adding every race
 
"Model" :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

Screenshot 7 1 2025 231233 incelsis1


:feelsclown:
 
Elordi should definitively be higher.
 
Elordi should definitively be higher.
Where should he place I keep changing some people around and adding people some peoples faces look a bit less attractive than others despite being god level attractive
 
you are delusional and mentally retarded, sorry brothER
Say something and make a suggestion instead of hurling an insult without mentioning the issue
 
Say something and make a suggestion instead of hurling an insult without mentioning the issue
delusional looksfags.org tier scale. at the same time some of the people should be way higher than they are on your scale and some way lower. delusion in every way
 
delusional looksfags.org tier scale. at the same time some of the people should be way higher than they are on your scale and some way lower. delusion in every way
Name them idiot or circle them and show me
 
You’re right see this wasn’t hard now where should they be, I’m human being I’m not perfect
how are these 2 "conventionally high" ? :

1736328246162

and what is the difference between "above average low " and "conventionally high"?
 
how are these 2 "conventionally high" ? :

View attachment 1363615
and what is the difference between "above average low " and "conventionally high"?
Tiny bits of attraction determines there placement if you feel they deserve to be higher or lower let me know again I’m not perfect
 
I just moved beanie down a tier
too many tiers anyway, nobody thinks like this. people usually place you into one of 3-4 categories depending on how severe the tunnel vision is: ugly, average (nothing special), handsome, very handsome. especially women, for them there is 3 categories, 3 tiers at best.
 
how are these 2 "conventionally high" ? :

View attachment 1363615
and what is the difference between "above average low " and "conventionally high"?
It’s really hard to pinpoint once you get higher up and again it’s based off the attraction in the face
 
too many tiers anyway, nobody thinks like this. people usually place you into one of 3-4 categories depending on how severe the tunnel vision is: ugly, average (nothing special), handsome, very handsome. especially women, for them there is 3 categories, 3 tiers at best.
Yes correct but since I’m an incel and free time why not go into every level of attraction it’s simply for fun I don’t care if anyone thinks like it or likes it . It’s fun to me
 
too many tiers anyway, nobody thinks like this. people usually place you into one of 3-4 categories depending on how severe the tunnel vision is: ugly, average (nothing special), handsome, very handsome. especially women, for them there is 3 categories, 3 tiers at best.
It’s just for fun there are a ton of levels of attraction so I came with these but you are correct and I don’t care I like doing it so I’m gonna analysis every bit down to a t and place them where I feel they need to go I don’t care who likes it if it’s wrong I’ll change it
 
you have these tiers : cute high, cute low etc. what is the point of those. people shown in the corresponding photos just like any others are either attractive or not attractive. "cute" doesnt possess a lot of meaning when it comes to defining attraction, especially for men. If you meant high harmony, prevalent feminine facial features then should have called them "prettyboy type". not that they are very handsome, but if they have a looks type then it is more or less prettyboy.
 
you have these tiers : cute high, cute low etc. what is the point of those. people shown in the corresponding photos just like any others are either attractive or not attractive. "cute" doesnt possess a lot of meaning when it comes to defining attraction, especially for men. If you meant high harmony, prevalent feminine facial features then should have called them "prettyboy type". not that they are very handsome, but if they have a looks type then it is more or less prettyboy.
Because it’s different levels to attraction and you can easily see if someone looks better than someone even if they’re both attractive so I came up with more names and again it’s for fun because I have time
 
Because it’s different levels to attraction and you can easily see if someone looks better than someone even if they’re both attractive so I came up with more names and again it’s for fun because I have time
i can see why you decided to call them cute but if i were you i would rename it to something like "prettyboy type low" etc. idk
 
i can see why you decided to call them cute but if i were you i would rename it to something like "prettyboy type low" etc. idk
IMG 1402
IMG 1403
But if the cap dude is more attractive than the dreads dude and they’re both pretty boys now what ? This is why I came up with the extra names you can easily see if someone looks better than another person in a lot of cases some people may be cute low and because that level of attraction is so low some people may not even consider those people attractive at all.
 
View attachment 1363624View attachment 1363625But if the cap dude is more attractive than the dreads dude and they’re both pretty boys now what ? This is why I came up with the extra names you can easily see if someone looks better than another person in a lot of cases some people may be cute low and because that level of attraction is so low some people may not even consider those people attractive at all.
pretty boy type- masculine , pretty boy - cute. further could also specify by giving them tiers of attraction e.g. "pretty boy type - cute (low)" "prettyboy type - masculine (high)"
 
pretty boy type- masculine , pretty boy - cute. further could also specify by giving them tiers of attraction e.g. "pretty boy type - cute (low)" "prettyboy type - masculine (high)"
Do you want to make 16 new names I’m not gonna change they names if I can’t change all of them and with the current name I have them memorized and it’s easier for me to understand
 
Where should he place I keep changing some people around and adding people some peoples faces look a bit less attractive than others despite being god level attractive
2nd or at least 3rd tier. He's good looking and tall.
 
what would you rate her?
Image 17 2
 

Similar threads

Lazyandtalentless
Replies
5
Views
368
Keulut
K
killchad
Replies
28
Views
269
m3nt4Lbl0ck3d
m3nt4Lbl0ck3d
Toxic_Manbabby
Replies
30
Views
864
glutty
glutty
Choler
Replies
25
Views
703
Rohan756
Rohan756
ihatefemcels
Replies
16
Views
445
BurntIvoryKingcel
BurntIvoryKingcel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top