Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL My mother thinks race is a made up concept

goyim next door

goyim next door

IQcel outcast.| MR CHANDLER'S TOP GUY
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 6, 2025
Posts
7,923
Online time
6d 12h
When I asked her how so she mentioned that it's because of "the new improved studies made by scientists"
 
Your mom is a retard
 
Women see race. Judge women by what they do, not what they say
 
Last edited:
I've never seen someone would've thought of that
 
How old is your mom and is she single?
 
I mean.... she's not wrong.
 
Least obvious gray larp in order to postmaxx:
 
Watch what they do, not what they say.

Foids will be BLM bitches and then still exclusively fuck with white guys.
 
Google IA says:

"Modern scientific consensus concludes that human races do not exist as biological or genetic categories, though race remains a significant social construct with real consequences. While humans exhibit diverse physical traits such as skin color and hair texture, research on human genetic variation shows that these differences are superficial and do not support dividing the species into biologically meaningful subgroups like subspecies"


What do you guys think of that? Based or bullshit?
 
Least obvious gray larp in order to postmaxx:



1765471234585
 
I just knew Caesercel would be in this thread. I could smell that Mumbai slum scent through my screen
 
The concept of race was contrived in early modern times before that their was no concept of race. I suppose you can't un ring a bell
 
When I asked her how so she mentioned that it's because of "the new improved studies made by scientists"
The irony in this is that newer studies actually vindicate racial categories of the past, they don’t debunk them. Anthropologists and population geneticists split mankind up into a number of genetic macro-populations, all of which approximate the racial categories of old:

• West Eurasian —> “Caucasoid”
• East Eurasian —> “Mongoloid”
• Australo-Melanesian —> “Australoid”
• Sub-Saharan African —> “Negroid”

I guess the only difference is that the SSA cluster is extremely broad due to the high level of genetic diversity in Africa and includes the Khoisan, who previously were discounted as part of the black race. But still, race is mostly vindicated.

The argument that “human genetic variation exists along a gradient therefore race ain’t real n shiet” is also stupid because people already knew genetic variation was a gradient even when the concept of race was mainstream. Hence Italians and Eastern Europeans at one point being considered “lesser whites” in America due to the belief that they were mixed with North Africans and East Asians respectively. So to act as if human genetic variation falling along a gradient is some revolutionary new knowledge that totally debunks race is retarded
 
I just knew Caesercel would be in this thread. I could smell that Mumbai slum scent through my screen
Hence Italians and Eastern Europeans at one point being considered “lesser whites” in America due to the belief that they were mixed with North Africans and East Asians respectively.
And of course, as DarkStar used to always point out in those debates with him, those beliefs and attitudes, however common they may have been, never became any sort of official policy in the US and "white ethnics" were always assimilated after a generation or two, always were considered ultimately white, and never were subject to the kind of restrictions nonwhites may have had placed upon them.
 
Drop her in nigger town
 
Google IA says:

"Modern scientific consensus concludes that human races do not exist as biological or genetic categories, though race remains a significant social construct with real consequences. While humans exhibit diverse physical traits such as skin color and hair texture, research on human genetic variation shows that these differences are superficial and do not support dividing the species into biologically meaningful subgroups like subspecies"


What do you guys think of that? Based or bullshit?
Marxist answer by Marxist programmed AI
 

Similar threads

andrej
Replies
21
Views
1K
THERAP1st
THERAP1st
goycel88
Replies
11
Views
503
goycel88
goycel88
S
Replies
79
Views
2K
VanGobbel
VanGobbel
S
Replies
14
Views
438
SubhumanOldcel
SubhumanOldcel
goycel88
Replies
41
Views
2K
SubhumanOldcel
SubhumanOldcel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top