Serious My message to people who say nobody is entitled to love, even lonely children

[Lazyandtalentless]

Go get ran over by a truck, breaking your neck, and then the driver pulls back, running over your already crushed body even more, and then after days, your guts that are now out of your body from being ran over gets eaten by vultures, you heartless, child abuse supporter, bully supporter, bigot.

 

[Based_Catcel]

True, normies are a bunch of bigots

 

[OutcompetedByRoomba]

How is the innately unfair distribution of desirable genetic material any different than the unequal distribution of wealth? How do we invest so much money, thought and effort into making women "equal" in every area where we can misrepresent the stats to make them look disadvantaged, but in the area most important to overall life quality men are just second class since birth and we aren't even gonna try to address that?

It's obvious just a cheap way to dismiss real concerns of fairness and equality when they aren't in the self-interest of women. They would never accept the same way of thinking about anything female related. "Not entitled to equal representation", "not entitled to earn just as much", "not entitled to my tax dollars". But because they are the privileged ones it's totally fine when it comes to an inequality in access to love and affection and sex.

Write a good response once, and then just copy-paste it every time someone posts something like that. So you can let out your anger without having to continue thinking about it and giving it room inside your head.

 

[PureImagination]

Love is essential for a human being’s mental health.

 

[Flagellum_Dei]

There's no such a thing as "being owed", if somebody say people are "owed" rights this would imply there's somebody to make them i.e. God. If I would refuse his existence, it would mean that all humans have natural liberty either for everything or for nothing. In second case I should consider every act, even such as breathing, as injustice, what makes this concept moronic. If I accept the first case, everything is allowed to man from nature. It means, that without a contract with another man there could not be any injustice in their deeds against each other. Thus, without the social contract, which was broken, there are no tidings for liberties of nonchads, therefore, if the only right that punish nonchads is based on strenght and if I was to consider such strenght-based law a good thing, the inobedience towards the laws that banish their liberties is an even better thing, since they used the same strength-based right to overpower previous lawmaker. Thus foids being graped or killed isn't injustice, foids aren't owed life nor "autonomy".

 

[Adolf Kitler]

Love is essential for the soul

 

[Emba]

I love my doggy

 

[Emba]

...and my herd of kitty cats

 

[erenyeager]

Go get ran over by a truck, breaking your neck, and then the driver pulls back, running over your already crushed body even more, and then after days, your guts that are now out of your body from being ran over gets eaten by vultures, you heartless, child abuse supporter, bully supporter, bigot.

Based inorganic response….