Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL My brother started ignoring me after I told him that human nature was to blame

Stupid Clown

Stupid Clown

The only good women are the dead ones
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 29, 2022
Posts
24,090
My brother was going on about how "muh religion bad." I responded that all of the violence he blamed on religion was simply a result of human nature. As an example to prove my point I showed him the numbers of Christians killed by the USSR and Chinese government. Both atheist governments. I concluded that no matter the ideology or religion or lack thereof, human nature will always remain the same and thus violence and discrimination will continue to occur. He went completely silent and since then has not communicated with me again.

I've posted before but It's funny how so many atheists are basically no better than Christians with this ridiculous idea they have that humans are inherently "good" and just corrupted by muh evil boogieman.


I don't really care that he hasn't communicated with me. I have no interest talking to simple minded monkeys.
 
Muh religion bad is a massive cope and religious people are happier. Most atheists funnily enough, as nietszche noted, ascribe to a very christian worldview but without god to support it
 
Muh religion bad is a massive cope and religious people are happier. Most atheists funnily enough, as nietszche noted, ascribe to a very christian worldview but without god to support it
Agreed completely. Very wise words. Religion is an effective means of stabilizing society and establishing rules. When you remove religion you're left with its skeleton and inevitably instability and chaos as it's altered to benefit those with the power to distribute propaganda.
 
Agreed completely. Very wise words. Religion is an effective means of stabilizing society and establishing rules. When you remove religion you're left with its skeleton and inevitably instability and chaos as it's altered to benefit those with the power to distribute propaganda.
Not only that. Look at buddhist monks, christian monks, hindu saddhus etc. They inflict suffering on themselves, but they view their lives as meaningful and fulfilling specifically bec of that! Religion acts as an antidote to nihlism, it makes suffering and this shit world seem valueable to the extant self inflicted harm can be encouraged. If you or i were fapable of beliving in a god, our suffering would seem far more bearable. I used to be a retarded atheist type a few years back, but as i realized the value of religion i changed my mind completely. Is your brother a tankie lol?
 
Not only that. Look at buddhist monks, christian monks, hindu saddhus etc. They inflict suffering on themselves, but they view their lives as meaningful and fulfilling specifically bec of that! Religion acts as an antidote to nihlism, it makes suffering and this shit world seem valueable to the extant self inflicted harm can be encouraged. If you or i were fapable of beliving in a god, our suffering would seem far more bearable. I used to be a retarded atheist type a few years back, but as i realized the value of religion i changed my mind completely. Is your brother a tankie lol?
Exactly. Ignorance is bliss. They claim that religion is outdated but it's just as useful in the modern day as a means of preventing people from overstimulating themselves in hedonism to the point they've exhausted their hedonic treadmills.

My brother isn't a tankie. He's just the type who copied all his beliefs from his college professors because he thinks doing so makes him smart and enlightened.
 
I've posted before but It's funny how so many atheists are basically no better than Christians with this ridiculous idea they have that humans are inherently "good" and just corrupted by muh evil boogieman.
That's 100% true. I've met oh so many atheist that made claims about objective morality and they couldn't back anything up. The final blackpill is moral antirealism, ie objective morality is made up.
 
That's 100% true. I've met oh so many atheist that made claims about objective morality and they couldn't back anything up. The final blackpill is moral antirealism, ie objective morality is made up.
That's something I came to realize soon after I stopped believing in God. I can't imagine how anyone could come to any other conclusion. Copers gonna cope I suppose.
 
Exactly. Ignorance is bliss. They claim that religion is outdated but it's just as useful in the modern day as a means of preventing people from overstimulating themselves in hedonism to the point they've exhausted their hedonic treadmills.

My brother isn't a tankie. He's just the type who copied all his beliefs from his college professors because he thinks doing so makes him smart and enlightened.
Unfortunately i know plenty like that. Secular society is unstable in the long run. Let me quote houellebecq "He gets to his main thesis. Our civilization, he says,
suffers from vital exhaustion. In the century of Louis
XIV, when the appetite for living was great, official
culture placed the accent on the negation of pleasure
and of the flesh; repeated insistently that mundane life can offer only imperfect joys, that the only true source
of happiness was in God. Such a discourse, he asserts,
would no longer be tolerated today. We need adventure
and eroticism because we need to hear ourselves repeat
that life is marvellous and exciting; and it's abundantly
clear that we rather doubt this."
 
Unfortunately i know plenty like that. Secular society is unstable in the long run. Let me quote houellebecq "He gets to his main thesis. Our civilization, he says,
suffers from vital exhaustion. In the century of Louis
XIV, when the appetite for living was great, official
culture placed the accent on the negation of pleasure
and of the flesh; repeated insistently that mundane life can offer only imperfect joys, that the only true source
of happiness was in God. Such a discourse, he asserts,
would no longer be tolerated today. We need adventure
and eroticism because we need to hear ourselves repeat
that life is marvellous and exciting; and it's abundantly
clear that we rather doubt this."
Very accurate. Unless you have access to constant new experiences you will inevitably become numb. It's scientifically impossible not to. Your prefrontal cortex dulls to whatever thing that was once pleasurable if you do it repeatedly.
 
That's something I came to realize soon after I stopped believing in God. I can't imagine how anyone could come to any other conclusion. Copers gonna cope I suppose.
Most atheists arent atheists bec they stopepd beliving like you did. Most are (at least the ones i know irl) "passive" having been doncitioned bt society to abandon religion. Thus their understanding of lets say judaism and christianity is rudimentary, but they still retain a general (like we mentioned) rleigious morality. Without religion however this morality becomes rather idiotic and far less impressive things like wokeness idk. Basically i am saying most secular people dont even think about religion or secularism so they take morality, their form of morality, for granted and never question its lack of legitimacy.
 
So it's ok to say something against religion but not against human nature? :feelsseriously:
People dont want to realise that they are inherently evil and want a scapegoat to blame, like religion
 
My brother was going on about how "muh religion bad." I responded that all of the violence he blamed on religion was simply a result of human nature. As an example to prove my point I showed him the numbers of Christians killed by the USSR and Chinese government. Both atheist governments. I concluded that no matter the ideology or religion or lack thereof, human nature will always remain the same and thus violence and discrimination will continue to occur. He went completely silent and since then has not communicated with me again.

I've posted before but It's funny how so many atheists are basically no better than Christians with this ridiculous idea they have that humans are inherently "good" and just corrupted by muh evil boogieman.


I don't really care that he hasn't communicated with me. I have no interest talking to simple minded monkeys.
Based.
A true Christian would at least admit that man cannot be good or righteous by himself, that his nature, the desires of his heart, are evil and selfish. Because without God he is subject to the law of the flesh with all its enticements and temptations. Just look at ungodly foids, how they uninhibitedly live out their carnal hypergamous nature without regard to losses.
These atheists sometimes remind me of militant vegans who have the absurd delusion that the animal kingdom is completely peaceful, etc.
 
Most atheists arent atheists bec they stopepd beliving like you did. Most are (at least the ones i know irl) "passive" having been doncitioned bt society to abandon religion. Thus their understanding of lets say judaism and christianity is rudimentary, but they still retain a general (like we mentioned) rleigious morality. Without religion however this morality becomes rather idiotic and far less impressive things like wokeness idk. Basically i am saying most secular people dont even think about religion or secularism so they take morality, their form of morality, for granted and never question its lack of legitimacy.
True, very true.

A good deal of them still believe in Christianity and are trying to convince themselves they don't out of fear I've noticed. It's why they hyper fixate on it. They're insecure in their beliefs.


So it's ok to say something against religion but not against human nature? :feelsseriously:
He was coping. I threatened his copium.


Based.
A true Christian would at least admit that man cannot be good or righteous by himself, that his nature, the desires of his heart, are evil and selfish. Because without God he is subject to the law of the flesh with all its enticements and temptations. Just look at ungodly foids, how they uninhibitedly live out their carnal hypergamous nature without regard to losses.
These atheists sometimes remind me of militant vegans who have the absurd delusion that the animal kingdom is completely peaceful, etc.
If God does not exist that means morality is either socially constructed in the individual minds of humans or based on instincts. People may virtue signal about racism yet everyone is inherently discriminatory because they have have instincts that are set against unattractive people. Thus they all end up hypocrites because at the end of the day the only "morals" that stay consistent are those based on instincts which are
• protect whamen
• worship attractive and tall men
• defend children who are cute
• dislike towards other men and the unattractive

Atheists like to argue that their modern progressive socially constructed morals are somehow the product of evolutionary adaption. The only thing that is a result of evolutionary adaption is people pretending to care about these "morals" for social validation.
 

Similar threads

K
Replies
2
Views
165
psyop
psyop
Lazyandtalentless
Replies
3
Views
305
VintageCarCoper
VintageCarCoper
Nordicel94
Replies
8
Views
368
Dissociative
Dissociative
Gogetacel
Replies
5
Views
173
Sasukecel
Sasukecel
zalikell.ir.ilxyne:
Replies
2
Views
203
zalikell.ir.ilxyne:
zalikell.ir.ilxyne:

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top