Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Mulla Sadra’s argument for Substantial Motion

philocel_

philocel_

Greycel
Joined
Apr 22, 2026
Posts
12
Online time
17m 48s
i dont think any of you cares about Islamic philosophy but whatever.
this was translated by chatGPT

Accidents are changeable—for example, an apple changes in its color, taste, and weight. The changes in accidents must therefore be caused by their substantial nature; that is, they are caused by the proximate natural agent, which is the substance. This substance must itself be changeable, based on the principle that the cause of what changes must itself be changing. Therefore, the substance is changeable.


We have already established in the seventh chapter that the cause of a changing thing must itself be changing. Hence, the natural agent or substance must be changing. Since accidents are changeable, and they are caused by substantial specific forms, and since every changing thing must have a changing cause, it follows that the substantial specific forms are themselves changeable, just like the accidents.


In other words, we can formulate a conditional syllogism as follows:
If the substantial specific forms are the cause of the existence of accidents, then they must be changeable. But they are indeed the cause of the existence of accidents. Therefore, they are changeable. And the substantial specific forms are the substance.
 
Islamic philosophy is underrated
 
If the quality changes then the thing also changes
 

Similar threads

noobungus
Replies
2
Views
566
tired as fuck
tired as fuck
hierophant
Replies
1
Views
559
GeckoBus
GeckoBus

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top