I was reminded about this while perusing the comments section on these relevant Green Texts:
View: https://youtu.be/XCnd7h0nd7k?si=EOmC9K4OiUnV9-wE
View: https://youtu.be/mK9mAeSQzYk?si=8xmlSdGLZwHs6KKT
The first video is a satirical corporate story and the second is really one about women’s “problems” being men’s dreams.
Regarding the title, the subject can be a wide variety of things — it can be affirmative action in STEM, it can be divorce laws, it can be scholarship structure, it can be online dating spreads, it can be criminal punishment differentials, it can really be a huge number of things (for some claim/source examples see the studies on the scientific blackpill wiki, my prior post, or some of the studies that are posted on this forum regularly) — no matter what it is there is without fail always a horde of women that will comment with some variation of “THIS ISNT TRUE BECAUSE IM A WOMAN AND I NEVER GOT ANY ADVANTAGES LIKE THIS!”
The truth is likely that they actually did get a number of similar advantages to those described in the green text stories throughout their life that they would not have received if they were a guy. They just weren’t aware of it. In the case of those videos even if the direct story is made up, the points the authors are lampooning are real. The first story wasn’t written by me but it could’ve been based on that exact story give or take playing out in the corporate world before my eyes (even down to the LinkedIn and Uni parts).
Suppose a woman is hired due to affirmative action — do you think they even know that’s why they were hired? Probably not. Sort of tangential to all that, it’s tiresome dealing with people where it doesn’t matter how good your studies are or how well you sourced your claim they just never acknowledge the point … because they don’t want to and it’s not in their best interest to admit the truth. They’re just self centered and intellectually dishonest weasels basically who believe things not because they’re true but because it’s beneficial to them.
View: https://youtu.be/XCnd7h0nd7k?si=EOmC9K4OiUnV9-wE
View: https://youtu.be/mK9mAeSQzYk?si=8xmlSdGLZwHs6KKT
The first video is a satirical corporate story and the second is really one about women’s “problems” being men’s dreams.
Regarding the title, the subject can be a wide variety of things — it can be affirmative action in STEM, it can be divorce laws, it can be scholarship structure, it can be online dating spreads, it can be criminal punishment differentials, it can really be a huge number of things (for some claim/source examples see the studies on the scientific blackpill wiki, my prior post, or some of the studies that are posted on this forum regularly) — no matter what it is there is without fail always a horde of women that will comment with some variation of “THIS ISNT TRUE BECAUSE IM A WOMAN AND I NEVER GOT ANY ADVANTAGES LIKE THIS!”
The truth is likely that they actually did get a number of similar advantages to those described in the green text stories throughout their life that they would not have received if they were a guy. They just weren’t aware of it. In the case of those videos even if the direct story is made up, the points the authors are lampooning are real. The first story wasn’t written by me but it could’ve been based on that exact story give or take playing out in the corporate world before my eyes (even down to the LinkedIn and Uni parts).
Suppose a woman is hired due to affirmative action — do you think they even know that’s why they were hired? Probably not. Sort of tangential to all that, it’s tiresome dealing with people where it doesn’t matter how good your studies are or how well you sourced your claim they just never acknowledge the point … because they don’t want to and it’s not in their best interest to admit the truth. They’re just self centered and intellectually dishonest weasels basically who believe things not because they’re true but because it’s beneficial to them.
Last edited:
