Blackpill Most of the degeneracy and suffering in society is part of a depopulation agenda

[IncelKing]

First of all, what interest do the elites have in lowering the population? Well put simply, there is a limited amount of resources on the planet, there is limited land on which to build houses and other infrastructure, limited amount of crops and livestock for food, limited amount of natural resources (gas, petroleum, minerals, metals etc.)

assuming the amount of resources on the planet is FIXED, the MORE people there are on the planet, the LESS resources available for each individual person to have ownership of which translates to a LOWER quality of life for the average person.

conversely, with a FIXED amount of resources on the planet, DECREASING THE POPULATION means there are MORE resources available for each person, thus the average quality of life is INCREASED, this is why the end goal of the elites is to reduce population.

but how are they achieving this in the modern era?

1. WAR

The war waged in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya by the United States, sanctioned by the United Nations, has left millions dead in those countries. The elites have used the excuse of “war on terror” to justify plundering those lands of its natural resources (oil from Iraq, opium from Afghanistan, natural gas and gold from Libya) while at the same time causing mass casualties in an effort to establish some form of population control.

2. HOMOSEXUALITY

Sexual reproduction requires heterosexual sex to occur. Sex between 2 men or sex between 2 women can never result in reproduction, so by promoting gay and lesbian couples, the elites are ensuring that there are less children being born so that in the long term, the population will decrease.

Normies think that gays and lesbians were given rights for the purpose of “muhhh freedom”, but the truth is that gays and lesbians were just puppets, they were just a tool used by the elites to achieve the objective of population control, it was never really about improving quality of life for homosexuals.

3. CONTRACEPTION AND ABORTION

The development of contraception and abortion has enabled people to have sex without bearing the consequence of reproduction, therefore many pregnancies are being prevented (through contraception) or terminated (through abortion), hence population will be lower.

4. COVID

the newest strategy the elites are using is covid, it has already killed over 10 million people and death toll will continue to rise, just when we think it’s over, a new strain seems to magically appear into existence. Based on the virus’s biological properties and chemical structure, it’s clear that this virus did not originate from nature, it had to have come from a lab. This virus was 100% man-made, created to cause deaths and reduce population.

'Whistleblower' unveils report claiming COVID was made in Wuhan lab

A Chinese virologist who fled Hong Kong for the United States has unveiled her 'evidence' that coronavirus is man-made.

www.google.com.au

 

[Incelius Savage]

Clap clap

 

[Deleted member 3129]

Isn't there a lack of population in first world countries?

 

[Ika-Sama]

First of all, what interest do the elites have in lowering the population? Well put simply, there is a limited amount of resources on the planet, there is limited land on which to build houses and other infrastructure, limited amount of crops and livestock for food, limited amount of natural resources (gas, petroleum, minerals, metals etc.)

assuming the amount of resources on the planet is FIXED, the MORE people there are on the planet, the LESS resources available for each individual person to have ownership of which translates to a LOWER quality of life for the average person.

conversely, with a FIXED amount of resources on the planet, DECREASING THE POPULATION means there are MORE resources available for each person, thus the average quality of life is INCREASED, this is why the end goal of the elites is to reduce population.

but how are they achieving this in the modern era?




3. CONTRACEPTION AND ABORTION

The development of contraception and abortion has enabled people to have sex without bearing the consequence of reproduction, therefore many pregnancies are being prevented (through contraception) or terminated (through abortion), hence population will be lower.

I literally don't see anything wrong with this. Let's hope there's less people by the end of the century.

 

[unsettling]

i want to add that women's rights are just a form of hybrid warfare used to keep less developed countries from uplifting their economy through a higher work force population. its a way for the elites to keep a common ground among those that already hold the top spot, as if a country like china started to tinker with the demographics of their populations in a more efficient way it would pose a more legitimate threat than simply them adjusting their economic management. hence the global influence of today's progressive culture.

 

[faded]

First of all, what interest do the elites have in lowering the population? Well put simply, there is a limited amount of resources on the planet, there is limited land on which to build houses and other infrastructure, limited amount of crops and livestock for food, limited amount of natural resources (gas, petroleum, minerals, metals etc.)

assuming the amount of resources on the planet is FIXED, the MORE people there are on the planet, the LESS resources available for each individual person to have ownership of which translates to a LOWER quality of life for the average person.

conversely, with a FIXED amount of resources on the planet, DECREASING THE POPULATION means there are MORE resources available for each person, thus the average quality of life is INCREASED, this is why the end goal of the elites is to reduce population.

but how are they achieving this in the modern era?

1. WAR

The war waged in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya by the United States, sanctioned by the United Nations, has left millions dead in those countries. The elites have used the excuse of “war on terror” to justify plundering those lands of its natural resources (oil from Iraq, opium from Afghanistan, natural gas and gold from Libya) while at the same time causing mass casualties in an effort to establish some form of population control.

2. HOMOSEXUALITY

Sexual reproduction requires heterosexual sex to occur. Sex between 2 men or sex between 2 women can never result in reproduction, so by promoting gay and lesbian couples, the elites are ensuring that there are less children being born so that in the long term, the population will decrease.

Normies think that gays and lesbians were given rights for the purpose of “muhhh freedom”, but the truth is that gays and lesbians were just puppets, they were just a tool used by the elites to achieve the objective of population control, it was never really about improving quality of life for homosexuals.

3. CONTRACEPTION AND ABORTION

The development of contraception and abortion has enabled people to have sex without bearing the consequence of reproduction, therefore many pregnancies are being prevented (through contraception) or terminated (through abortion), hence population will be lower.

4. COVID

the newest strategy the elites are using is covid, it has already killed over 10 million people and death toll will continue to rise, just when we think it’s over, a new strain seems to magically appear into existence. Based on the virus’s biological properties and chemical structure, it’s clear that this virus did not originate from nature, it had to have come from a lab. This virus was 100% man-made, created to cause deaths and reduce population.

'Whistleblower' unveils report claiming COVID was made in Wuhan lab

A Chinese virologist who fled Hong Kong for the United States has unveiled her 'evidence' that coronavirus is man-made.

www.google.com.au

 

[TallCelFag]

 

[Deleted member 39755]

if this were true, why is the population still growing?
[UWSL]Let's be real if the "elites" as you call them wanted to depopulate earth they would create new soy laws that made it an offence to have kids or have more than one kid, like what the chinese "elites" did[/UWSL]

 

[faded]

I hope the new variant eliminates millions

 

[Viskallide]

I dont belive in conspiracy theories, as people even the elites are to stupid to pull something like this off. Its just pure old ignorance going on.

But COVID is a scam

 

[IncelKing]

if this were true, why is the population still growing?
[UWSL]Let's be real if the "elites" as you call them wanted to depopulate earth they would create new soy laws that made it an offence to have kids or have more than one kid, like what the chinese "elites" did[/UWSL]

if elites were to create laws forbidding people from having more than one kid, people would rebel and also it would make the elite’s motives too obvious, the best way for the elites to depopulate the world is through more subtle, discreet ways, they don’t want to do it in the open, they are working in the shadows.

I dont belive in conspiracy theories, as people even the elites are to stupid to pull something like this off. Its just pure old ignorance going on.

But COVID is a scam

the real conspiracy is to label the truth as being a conspiracy theory, what I wrote should make enough sense for you to figure it out, Think about it logically and put all the pieces together, it will create a clear picture of what’s happening.

 

[WizardofSoda]

if elites were to create laws forbidding people from having more than one kid, people would rebel and also it would make the elite’s motives too obvious, the best way for the elites to depopulate the world is through more subtle, discreet ways, they don’t want to do it in the open, they are working in the shadows.


the real conspiracy is to label the truth as being a conspiracy theory, what I wrote should make enough sense for you to figure it out, Think about it logically and put all the pieces together, it will create a clear picture of what’s happening.

Yes the subtle and discreet ways like you say are the way of public policy to do real change. And its a gradual change so it requires patience. And there isn't direct force involved - which is nice for the elites too because then they don't have to live a certain way themselves.

So through many different subtle policies and propaganda they gradually shift society in the way they want. And you cannot oppose them on any one change because it is minor. And the complexity of what they were doing it is beyond the ability to think of 99.9% of people. The people also aren't aware of what the overall strategy is.

Its how I've been talking about my eugenics program. No force involved, no sterilizing people or murdering people or anything like that. Just subtle measures like themes in tv shows that are unsaid. Free and easy to get contraception to undesirables.. and the opposite hoops to get for the desirables contraception.

People we want to have children like doctors and scientists.. the family benefits are so generous they almost can't turn them down. Yet who can oppose family benefits for people or even know about them if we don't publicize it. Or see that it is part of a coordinated plan.
For example those hoops for desirable women to put in place to reduce the number of them getting on birth control pills. Outright banning birth control pills is going to face resistance. But changes in the guidelines so that there is additional steps and testing and so forth and defining who those are for to match who we want it targeted at.

And each extra step will have a justified and logical reason why we are doing it to protect the health of the women. And we know determined desirable women they can if they push hard enough get through our hoops. But its about reducing the number who do.

 

[IncelKing]

Yes the subtle and discreet ways like you say are the way of public policy to do real change. And its a gradual change so it requires patience. And there isn't direct force involved - which is nice for the elites too because then they don't have to live a certain way themselves.

So through many different subtle policies and propaganda they gradually shift society in the way they want. And you cannot oppose them on any one change because it is minor. And the complexity of what they were doing it is beyond the ability to think of 99.9% of people. The people also aren't aware of what the overall strategy is.

Its how I've been talking about my eugenics program. No force involved, no sterilizing people or murdering people or anything like that. Just subtle measures like themes in tv shows that are unsaid. Free and easy to get contraception to undesirables.. and the opposite hoops to get for the desirables contraception.

People we want to have children like doctors and scientists.. the family benefits are so generous they almost can't turn them down. Yet who can oppose family benefits for people or even know about them if we don't publicize it. Or see that it is part of a coordinated plan.
For example those hoops for desirable women to put in place to reduce the number of them getting on birth control pills. Outright banning birth control pills is going to face resistance. But changes in the guidelines so that there is additional steps and testing and so forth and defining who those are for to match who we want it targeted at.

And each extra step will have a justified and logical reason why we are doing it to protect the health of the women. And we know determined desirable women they can if they push hard enough get through our hoops. But its about reducing the number who do.

the elites will claim that the policies they are implementing are for literally any reason OTHER THAN population control, to mask their true intentions.

they will say they promote homosexuality because gays and lesbians deserve to have the same rights, when really they want less people to reproduce, they say they promote abortion becauseit’s a woman’s right to have autonomy over her own body, but the real reason once again is to ensure less women are giving birth.

they say one thing but they have plans for something else, their true intentions become obvious the moment you analyse their actions and the consequences of those actions upon society. Once you see the real life effects of their policies, you realise what their real plans are.

 

[WizardofSoda]

the elites will claim that the policies they are implementing are for literally any reason OTHER THAN population control, to mask their true intentions.

they will say they promote homosexuality because gays and lesbians deserve to have the same rights, when really they want less people to reproduce, they say they promote abortion becauseit’s a woman’s right to have autonomy over her own body, but the real reason once again is to ensure less women are giving birth.

they say one thing but they have plans for something else, their true intentions become obvious the moment you analyse their actions and the consequences of those actions upon society. Once you see the real life effects of their policies, you realise what their real plans are.

Yes you understand much about what state power is today, how to use it.

Something for people like us is we can convince the masses of any position. With state power you can hire university professors to write the propaganda. And have organizations within the state who are experts at developing and bringing out the propaganda. If focus groups and so forth lead to one message looking good, but then in the real world it doesn't work that well, another reasoning can be brought out.

What you say is whatever people want to hear. What you do is what must actually be done. So say I want to build natural gas plants, but the public wants solar farms. On TV and from official announcements we are building solar farms. We bombard them with images of all the solar farms we are building across the land. We have real solar plants being built and real research into solar power.

Meantime in remote areas and without fanfare we are constructing natural gas plants. Maybe only 1 or 2% of our construction expenditure is on the solar farms. One by one we will shut them all down when no one is watching. In speeches our plan is to build solar farms, the future is solar.


If I was taking rights away from women it would either be done discreetly or with fanfare under the name of protecting women or giving more rights to women. No one reads the bills or understands what they are really doing.

When they make it easy for women to get student loans to go to college for 4 years in the prime of their fertility window, that can be one part of the plan. Yet who is against student loans for women? Are any normies or foids in the whole nation against more funding for education?

They figured out it doesn't matter what the people believe, and not 1 in 10,000 of the people has a clear picture of the big picture what is happening and why. People see that solar farm going up in their city and they are happy. They don't know of a massive gas plant in a remote area or how many of those there are.

 

[over4men]

well it is true , the less people there are around you the better your own quality of life becomes , i remember reading a manga where most men get killed by a virus and one incel who was bullied through hs survives and the women are willing to go war for a chance to have sex with him , the best way our lives will improve is if there's less people and less men especially around you

 

[Deleted member 35171]

Whether there is a conspiracy or not is irrelevant to me, what is relevant is that the mainstream ideology is literally self-destructive and this post provides great examples for it
The only reason to support or reject different ideologies for me is whether or not they are sustainable, "morality" is irrelevant. Bluepill liberal ideology is literally not sustainable and HAS to be replaced by something entirely different if the human species wants to survive.

 

[IncelKing]

Yes you understand much about what state power is today, how to use it.

Something for people like us is we can convince the masses of any position. With state power you can hire university professors to write the propaganda. And have organizations within the state who are experts at developing and bringing out the propaganda. If focus groups and so forth lead to one message looking good, but then in the real world it doesn't work that well, another reasoning can be brought out.

What you say is whatever people want to hear. What you do is what must actually be done. So say I want to build natural gas plants, but the public wants solar farms. On TV and from official announcements we are building solar farms. We bombard them with images of all the solar farms we are building across the land. We have real solar plants being built and real research into solar power.

Meantime in remote areas and without fanfare we are constructing natural gas plants. Maybe only 1 or 2% of our construction expenditure is on the solar farms. One by one we will shut them all down when no one is watching. In speeches our plan is to build solar farms, the future is solar.


If I was taking rights away from women it would either be done discreetly or with fanfare under the name of protecting women or giving more rights to women. No one reads the bills or understands what they are really doing.

When they make it easy for women to get student loans to go to college for 4 years in the prime of their fertility window, that can be one part of the plan. Yet who is against student loans for women? Are any normies or foids in the whole nation against more funding for education?

They figured out it doesn't matter what the people believe, and not 1 in 10,000 of the people has a clear picture of the big picture what is happening and why. People see that solar farm going up in their city and they are happy. They don't know of a massive gas plant in a remote area or how many of those there are.

completely right, they control the education system so they control what information is given to the population and they are in control of the content which students learn in class. Schools and universities are just brainwashing centres where you go to learn what the ELITES WANT YOU TO LEARN so that you can be a good slave, not what YOU NEED TO LEARN, so that you can escape the shackles of wage slavery and become an elite yourself.

schools never teach you how to complete tax returns, how to start a business, how to run a company, how to be innovative, how to be an entrepreneur etc. You are just taught basic maths, English and science so that you can become a doctor, lawyer, engineer, architect etc. but whatever you become, you will always be working FOR somebody else. Schools only give us the skills necessary to be employed by others, they don’t teach you how to be self-employed, schools are slave training facilities.

likewise the media is a tool used to disemminate state propaganda, through journalism, news channels, newspapers etc. if they want to start a war in another country, they will label the leader of the country as being an evil, ruthless dictator who is mercilessly butchering his own people and that foreign intervention is required for the safety and security of the people of that nation.

that’s what happened in Libya. Don’t know how much you know about this but before 1969, Libya was controlled by a king who was loyal to British and French imperialists. Only the king, his advisors, officials and those with imperial blood lived in luxury while the rest of the native Libyan population lived in mud huts.

Muhammad Gaddafi came in 1969 and took power via a Coup, he reigned for 40 years during which time he built the country from the ground, upwards.

He industrialised the oil and natural gas sector, he developed the infrastructure of the country by building roads, large apartment buildings and housing complexes, universities, schools, hospitals etc. He strengthened the country’s military and invested in education programmes, he even gave women heaps of rights.

but one day he decided to create a currency to be used by the whole continent of Africa, the same way Europeans trade using the “EURO” currency. This currency that Gaddafi was developing was called the “gold dinar”, it is a currency backed by African gold. Trade of African resources would take place in this currency only. This meant that it didn’t matter how much US dollars you have, your purchasing power of African resources depends on how much “gold dinar” you have as that was the currency being used for trade, so countries who’s currencies are backed by the US dollar had no power in such a marketplace, meanwhile African nations now had the power to keep African resources circulating in Africa instead of being sold to other countries.

USA didn’t like this, so they had CIA agents go to Libya to instigate an uprising, by selling Libyan citizens a false dream of “democracy” and “freedom”. The citizens became rebels and their numbers started to grow rapidly, At the beginning of the uprising the rebels attacked military posts resulting in the soldiers firing back in self-defence, but the Western media twisted this story to make it look like Gaddafi ordered his troops to fire at unarmed protestors, when in reality those rebels fired first.

the western media painted Gaddafi as a ruthless tyrant who was senselessly murdering his own population, media was used to brainwash the population of western countries to support the west’s impending war in Libya and to justify the foreign intervention of the west by claiming that they were going to Libya for humanitarian reasons when really it was all about resources.

in the end, after a 9 month civil war, Gaddafi was killed, his country was in ruins, cities were reduced to ashes, hundreds of thousands of people were dead and his regime was put to an end.

Now, after money was invested in the war and even more money was used to repair the country in the aftermath of the war, the country went from being almost a first world country to being a poor shithole, but hey at least the Libyans got their “freedom” am I right?

this shows you the power of the media, and how the elites use it to their benefit. The media is so powerful that it can be used to brainwash the population into believing that the destruction of a country and killing of its citizens in a war is necessary for the greater good.

 

[WizardofSoda]

completely right, they control the education system so they control what information is given to the population and they are in control of the content which students learn in class. Schools and universities are just brainwashing centres where you go to learn what the ELITES WANT YOU TO LEARN so that you can be a good slave, not what YOU NEED TO LEARN, so that you can escape the shackles of wage slavery and become an elite yourself.

schools never teach you how to complete tax returns, how to start a business, how to run a company, how to be innovative, how to be an entrepreneur etc. You are just taught basic maths, English and science so that you can become a doctor, lawyer, engineer, architect etc. but whatever you become, you will always be working FOR somebody else. Schools only give us the skills necessary to be employed by others, they don’t teach you how to be self-employed, schools are slave training facilities.

likewise the media is a tool used to disemminate state propaganda, through journalism, news channels, newspapers etc. if they want to start a war in another country, they will label the leader of the country as being an evil, ruthless dictator who is mercilessly butchering his own people and that foreign intervention is required for the safety and security of the people of that nation.

that’s what happened in Libya. Don’t know how much you know about this but before 1969, Libya was controlled by a king who was loyal to British and French imperialists. Only the king, his advisors, officials and those with imperial blood lived in luxury while the rest of the native Libyan population lived in mud huts.

Muhammad Gaddafi came in 1969 and took power via a Coup, he reigned for 40 years during which time he built the country from the ground, upwards.

He industrialised the oil and natural gas sector, he developed the infrastructure of the country by building roads, large apartment buildings and housing complexes, universities, schools, hospitals etc. He strengthened the country’s military and invested in education programmes, he even gave women heaps of rights.

but one day he decided to create a currency to be used by the whole continent of Africa, the same way Europeans trade using the “EURO” currency. This currency that Gaddafi was developing was called the “gold dinar”, it is a currency backed by African gold. Trade of African resources would take place in this currency only. This meant that it didn’t matter how much US dollars you have, your purchasing power of African resources depends on how much “gold dinar” you have as that was the currency being used for trade, so countries who’s currencies are backed by the US dollar had no power in such a marketplace, meanwhile African nations now had the power to keep African resources circulating in Africa instead of being sold to other countries.

USA didn’t like this, so they had CIA agents go to Libya to instigate an uprising, by selling Libyan citizens a false dream of “democracy” and “freedom”. The citizens became rebels and their numbers started to grow rapidly, At the beginning of the uprising the rebels attacked military posts resulting in the soldiers firing back in self-defence, but the Western media twisted this story to make it look like Gaddafi ordered his troops to fire at unarmed protestors, when in reality those rebels fired first.

the western media painted Gaddafi as a ruthless tyrant who was senselessly murdering his own population, media was used to brainwash the population of western countries to support the west’s impending war in Libya and to justify the foreign intervention of the west by claiming that they were going to Libya for humanitarian reasons when really it was all about resources.

in the end, after a 9 month civil war, Gaddafi was killed, his country was in ruins, cities were reduced to ashes, hundreds of thousands of people were dead and his regime was put to an end.

Now, after money was invested in the war and even more money was used to repair the country in the aftermath of the war, the country went from being almost a first world country to being a poor shithole, but hey at least the Libyans got their “freedom” am I right?

this shows you the power of the media, and how the elites use it to their benefit. The media is so powerful that it can be used to brainwash the population into believing that the destruction of a country and killing of its citizens in a war is necessary for the greater good.

Good example I don't know much about the Libya situation. But the dollar is a key to American wealth. We get essentially $1 trillion in free stuff a year with it.

Ya control of the education system is key along with the media. That way history is whatever they say it is. Same with science it is whatever they say it is. And they can decide what not to include in education like how to start a business or really anything about how basic economics work.

Its so easy to trick normies because you can have an entire economics program even a full university program and they can still graduate not knowing anything - but even better than ignorance is they think they know it all. Better than ignorance is teaching people things that aren't true. Then people would have to unlearn what they learned as children, which not 1 in 1,000 can get that stuff out of their head and thinking.

America has something really powerful to deal with the few kids who grow up and figure things out and start getting power.. Bring them into the elite. Something many other countries aren't willing to do.


America did something else how do you get the people of the world to watch your propaganda. Other places tried basically forcing people to watch speeches and that. But it doesn't really work. The true way is you make the most entertaining movies and tv shows. People actually choose to watch it, even pay for it. Then you put the messages in the shows. But its hard to do which is why most places don't do it. Its hard to win the true way by being better.

The Soviets knew how over it was when in the 80's all throughout their empire the people were watching American movies including Communist officials at movie theatres. Outlawing it would just make it even more powerful.

Thats how Islam is falling. We can't fight them on the ground there is just too many people and fighting them it just gets resistance. Our army got bogged down in not that much a percentage of the Islamic world. But music, ideas, movies, tv shows, fashion, etc.. that is how you get control. By fighting in their imaginations.


An irony of many people who become very rich is there was something wrong with them that hey didn't do well in college or didn't work well with others in a career. Thus being forced to go out on their own, and then learning the hard way but real way.

I realized even the idea of 'educating people', its not how things really work - you learn by doing.

 

[IncelKing]

Good example I don't know much about the Libya situation. But the dollar is a key to American wealth. We get essentially $1 trillion in free stuff a year with it.

Ya control of the education system is key along with the media. That way history is whatever they say it is. Same with science it is whatever they say it is. And they can decide what not to include in education like how to start a business or really anything about how basic economics work.

Its so easy to trick normies because you can have an entire economics program even a full university program and they can still graduate not knowing anything - but even better than ignorance is they think they know it all. Better than ignorance is teaching people things that aren't true. Then people would have to unlearn what they learned as children, which not 1 in 1,000 can get that stuff out of their head and thinking.

America has something really powerful to deal with the few kids who grow up and figure things out and start getting power.. Bring them into the elite. Something many other countries aren't willing to do.


America did something else how do you get the people of the world to watch your propaganda. Other places tried basically forcing people to watch speeches and that. But it doesn't really work. The true way is you make the most entertaining movies and tv shows. People actually choose to watch it, even pay for it. Then you put the messages in the shows. But its hard to do which is why most places don't do it. Its hard to win the true way by being better.

The Soviets knew how over it was when in the 80's all throughout their empire the people were watching American movies including Communist officials at movie theatres. Outlawing it would just make it even more powerful.

Thats how Islam is falling. We can't fight them on the ground there is just too many people and fighting them it just gets resistance. Our army got bogged down in not that much a percentage of the Islamic world. But music, ideas, movies, tv shows, fashion, etc.. that is how you get control. By fighting in their imaginations.


An irony of many people who become very rich is there was something wrong with them that hey didn't do well in college or didn't work well with others in a career. Thus being forced to go out on their own, and then learning the hard way but real way.

I realized even the idea of 'educating people', its not how things really work - you learn by doing.

great point I completely forgot about the influence of the entertainment sector (Hollywood, music industry, sports etc.).

The western world can never destroy Islam, you kill a million muslims and they will be replaced by another million, because muslims have high birth rates, it’s not uncommon for Muslim families to have more than 3 children in the family. And the next generation of muslims who replace the dead muslims of the past generation, will be vengeful and angry at the west for their actions, so they will just hit back at the west twice as hard, it’s a never-ending war.

a physical war has its disadvantages, instead you can wage psychological warfare by creating movies, tv shows which contain various propaganda, and then presenting that material in a way which is engaging and entertaining, like movies, TV shows, music etc.

so the west creates movies, TV shows which present the idea of “freedom” and “democracy”, and the existence of the internet means these movies, Tv shows will be watched all around the world, including in Muslim countries which are mostly dictatorships and in which the citizens have limited freedoms.

when a young Muslim girl, after watching western movies/tv shows, realises that her country forces her to wear hijab and retain her virginity until marriage and that her marriage will be arranged to some random ugly ethnic, then she compares her life to that of the girls in America who can dress how they want and have sex before marriage not with ethnic subhumans but with white chads, she will start to resent the religion she was born into and will eventually want to live the way that westerners do.

you don’t necessarily have to kill muslims in order to eradicate Islam, you can convert them to non-muslims by poisoning their minds until they hate their own religion and switch to the other side.

 

[IncelKing]

well it is true , the less people there are around you the better your own quality of life becomes , i remember reading a manga where most men get killed by a virus and one incel who was bullied through hs survives and the women are willing to go war for a chance to have sex with him , the best way our lives will improve is if there's less people and less men especially around you

yes, In a world of limited resources, the level of competition for resources is proportional to the size of population. The greater the population, the greater the competition.

 

[Deleted member 39864]

You forgot about the extended schooling system and putting women in the workforce. Many women don't have children until late 20's/early 30's

 

[WizardofSoda]

great point I completely forgot about the influence of the entertainment sector (Hollywood, music industry, sports etc.).

The western world can never destroy Islam, you kill a million muslims and they will be replaced by another million, because muslims have high birth rates, it’s not uncommon for Muslim families to have more than 3 children in the family. And the next generation of muslims who replace the dead muslims of the past generation, will be vengeful and angry at the west for their actions, so they will just hit back at the west twice as hard, it’s a never-ending war.

a physical war has its disadvantages, instead you can wage psychological warfare by creating movies, tv shows which contain various propaganda, and then presenting that material in a way which is engaging and entertaining, like movies, TV shows, music etc.

so the west creates movies, TV shows which present the idea of “freedom” and “democracy”, and the existence of the internet means these movies, Tv shows will be watched all around the world, including in Muslim countries which are mostly dictatorships and in which the citizens have limited freedoms.

when a young Muslim girl, after watching western movies/tv shows, realises that her country forces her to wear hijab and retain her virginity until marriage and that her marriage will be arranged to some random ugly ethnic, then she compares her life to that of the girls in America who can dress how they want and have sex before marriage not with ethnic subhumans but with white chads, she will start to resent the religion she was born into and will eventually want to live the way that westerners do.

you don’t necessarily have to kill muslims in order to eradicate Islam, you can convert them to non-muslims by poisoning their minds until they hate their own religion and switch to the other side.

Good example I was thinking about controlling the mens minds, but the girls even better. No way can you tell a girl who sees other girls on tv doing things she wants to do and being a woman she could do like having sex with Chads, that she isn't allowed. We can even throw a bunch of Arab ancestry girls in the shows.

Ya we could be killing 1 million Muslims a year in war and killing 10 to 1, so only losing 100,000 ourselves. And 1 million wouldn't make the slightest difference to their population, because it grows by 10's of millions a year. Killing people would unite them and make them more religious.

You know even the government officials and the Imams they are sitting in their living rooms watching our tv shows and movies with their families.

One sinister idea is to redefine what Islam is. So a Muslim can stay Muslim. Who says Islam isn't pro-womens rights and pro-homosexuals.

 

[IncelKing]

Good example I was thinking about controlling the mens minds, but the girls even better. No way can you tell a girl who sees other girls on tv doing things she wants to do and being a woman she could do like having sex with Chads, that she isn't allowed. We can even throw a bunch of Arab ancestry girls in the shows.

Ya we could be killing 1 million Muslims a year in war and killing 10 to 1, so only losing 100,000 ourselves. And 1 million wouldn't make the slightest difference to their population, because it grows by 10's of millions a year. Killing people would unite them and make them more religious.

You know even the government officials and the Imams they are sitting in their living rooms watching our tv shows and movies with their families.

One sinister idea is to redefine what Islam is. So a Muslim can stay Muslim. Who says Islam isn't pro-womens rights and pro-homosexuals.

Not too sure about government officials being influenced by western media and entertainment, they still strictly enforce sharia law in their country. Western media/entertainment promotes being a gay faggot, but homosexuality is still heavily punished in Islamic countries, you can even get your hands chopped off for petty theft, sharia is heavily applied in Islamic countries by the government who don’t seem to be influenced by the west at all, it’s Just regular citizens who are influenced most of the time.

 

[IncelKing]

You forgot about the extended schooling system and putting women in the workforce. Many women don't have children until late 20's/early 30's

true shit nigga

 

[Lifeisbullshit95]

First of all, what interest do the elites have in lowering the population? Well put simply, there is a limited amount of resources on the planet, there is limited land on which to build houses and other infrastructure, limited amount of crops and livestock for food, limited amount of natural resources (gas, petroleum, minerals, metals etc.)

assuming the amount of resources on the planet is FIXED, the MORE people there are on the planet, the LESS resources available for each individual person to have ownership of which translates to a LOWER quality of life for the average person.

conversely, with a FIXED amount of resources on the planet, DECREASING THE POPULATION means there are MORE resources available for each person, thus the average quality of life is INCREASED, this is why the end goal of the elites is to reduce population.

but how are they achieving this in the modern era?

1. WAR

The war waged in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya by the United States, sanctioned by the United Nations, has left millions dead in those countries. The elites have used the excuse of “war on terror” to justify plundering those lands of its natural resources (oil from Iraq, opium from Afghanistan, natural gas and gold from Libya) while at the same time causing mass casualties in an effort to establish some form of population control.

2. HOMOSEXUALITY

Sexual reproduction requires heterosexual sex to occur. Sex between 2 men or sex between 2 women can never result in reproduction, so by promoting gay and lesbian couples, the elites are ensuring that there are less children being born so that in the long term, the population will decrease.

Normies think that gays and lesbians were given rights for the purpose of “muhhh freedom”, but the truth is that gays and lesbians were just puppets, they were just a tool used by the elites to achieve the objective of population control, it was never really about improving quality of life for homosexuals.

3. CONTRACEPTION AND ABORTION

The development of contraception and abortion has enabled people to have sex without bearing the consequence of reproduction, therefore many pregnancies are being prevented (through contraception) or terminated (through abortion), hence population will be lower.

4. COVID

the newest strategy the elites are using is covid, it has already killed over 10 million people and death toll will continue to rise, just when we think it’s over, a new strain seems to magically appear into existence. Based on the virus’s biological properties and chemical structure, it’s clear that this virus did not originate from nature, it had to have come from a lab. This virus was 100% man-made, created to cause deaths and reduce population.

'Whistleblower' unveils report claiming COVID was made in Wuhan lab

A Chinese virologist who fled Hong Kong for the United States has unveiled her 'evidence' that coronavirus is man-made.

www.google.com.au

Tinder nigga put tinder with red nigga

Tinder

 

[XerxesAzrael]

I agree with OP, I iwsh I could explain in detail on why I agree with him, but I'm too lazy

Let's be real if the "elites" as you call them wanted to depopulate earth they would create new soy laws that made it an offence to have kids or have more than one kid, like what the chinese "elites" did

The reason why is because if they did that, people would find that very suspicious so it's best for them to do stuff little by little

 

[CurrycelRaja]

its ok bro.
bengalis dont reproduce either way

 

[HenkkaH]

3. CONTRACEPTION AND ABORTION

The development of contraception and abortion has enabled people to have sex without bearing the consequence of reproduction, therefore many pregnancies are being prevented (through contraception) or terminated (through abortion), hence population will be lower.

This is both good and bad.

But COVID is a scam

More shekels for the pharma company CEO's.

 

[Richard Coper]

Nothing but facts in one text. People are too manipulated to even consider that they might be manipulated. Anyway, i am not worried about humanity, i would not be better if i had the power of the elite. I would be sitting with them and do just the same. I just hope that it doesn't hit me and even if it does, then so be it.

 

[IncelKing]

its ok bro.
bengalis dont reproduce either way

pakis don’t reproduce either, thats why they molest schoolgirls in the UK

 

[CurrycelRaja]

pakis don’t reproduce either, thats why they molest schoolgirls in the UK

 

[ezio6]

enjoy 10$ hooker while u can

 

[Deleted member 40696]

Even after all that killing and plundering, white race is most likely to go extinct mainly due to few factors, and it’s not white women breeding with none whites that’s just one the small factors

 

[Deleted member 1269]

First of all, what interest do the elites have in lowering the population? Well put simply, there is a limited amount of resources on the planet, there is limited land on which to build houses and other infrastructure, limited amount of crops and livestock for food, limited amount of natural resources (gas, petroleum, minerals, metals etc.)

assuming the amount of resources on the planet is FIXED, the MORE people there are on the planet, the LESS resources available for each individual person to have ownership of which translates to a LOWER quality of life for the average person.

conversely, with a FIXED amount of resources on the planet, DECREASING THE POPULATION means there are MORE resources available for each person, thus the average quality of life is INCREASED, this is why the end goal of the elites is to reduce population.

but how are they achieving this in the modern era?

1. WAR

The war waged in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya by the United States, sanctioned by the United Nations, has left millions dead in those countries. The elites have used the excuse of “war on terror” to justify plundering those lands of its natural resources (oil from Iraq, opium from Afghanistan, natural gas and gold from Libya) while at the same time causing mass casualties in an effort to establish some form of population control.

2. HOMOSEXUALITY

Sexual reproduction requires heterosexual sex to occur. Sex between 2 men or sex between 2 women can never result in reproduction, so by promoting gay and lesbian couples, the elites are ensuring that there are less children being born so that in the long term, the population will decrease.

Normies think that gays and lesbians were given rights for the purpose of “muhhh freedom”, but the truth is that gays and lesbians were just puppets, they were just a tool used by the elites to achieve the objective of population control, it was never really about improving quality of life for homosexuals.

3. CONTRACEPTION AND ABORTION

The development of contraception and abortion has enabled people to have sex without bearing the consequence of reproduction, therefore many pregnancies are being prevented (through contraception) or terminated (through abortion), hence population will be lower.

4. COVID

the newest strategy the elites are using is covid, it has already killed over 10 million people and death toll will continue to rise, just when we think it’s over, a new strain seems to magically appear into existence. Based on the virus’s biological properties and chemical structure, it’s clear that this virus did not originate from nature, it had to have come from a lab. This virus was 100% man-made, created to cause deaths and reduce population.

'Whistleblower' unveils report claiming COVID was made in Wuhan lab

A Chinese virologist who fled Hong Kong for the United States has unveiled her 'evidence' that coronavirus is man-made.

www.google.com.au

Sounds like cope tbh. The elite can wipe out chunks of the population if they wanted by creating lab viruses and diseases constantly and no one would notice. It's just female nature being primitive, shitty and flawed, the Jews and elite can't control nature

 

[Deleted member 40696]

enjoy 10$ hooker while u can

Where the fk do U live? Lucky fag

 

[Deleted member 41061]

Why was he banned? [the OP ]

 

[IncelKing]

Why was he banned? [the OP ]

I’m back you niggER