Here's a clip from a police interview with some dude who got caught on the Chris Hansen show, watch for like 20 seconds.
View: https://youtu.be/X5QnqwsGxn0?t=3833
If you watch, the police dude says to him "what if that was your daughter".
You see, when people argue for AoC, they may say stuff like "what if that was your daughter", but they would never say "what if that was your son." The question is, why do they say daughter, and not son? Well, the answer should be obvious. It's because it's not about "protecting children", its about cockblocking men from prime teen pussy. In fact, when looking at age of consent laws, there are often different numbers depending on position of authority. For example, an adult fucking a teen, has a lower AoC (usually 16) than a teacher fucking their student (usually 18). However, people would be more appalled by a random adult male fucking a 16 year old female LEGALLY, then they would if they heard about a female teacher fucking her 16 year old male student lLLEGALLY. Which is confusing, because the law clearly would indicate a teacher fucking their teen student would be worse than a random adult fucking a random teen, since one has a position of authority, and the other does not.
Of course, it isn't confusing when you realize the law has a clear gender bias, which is to demonize male sexuality, as well as reduce competition for roasties who rode the cock carousel when they were younger. You see women complain all the time about men who date college aged females, it's all about jealousy and fear of competition, which would only be amplified if jbs who were sexual beings were legalized.
Age of consent laws are voted this way because fathers are too lazy to train their daughter not to be a whore, so they just vote in laws to cockblock older dudes from fucking their daughter. Of course, this doesn't end up working out since teen Chad just plows their JB daughter, which they also get uneasy about, but their hands are tied in that situation:
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskMen/comments/1fh8p0/why_are_fathers_so_weird_about_their_daughters/?utm_term=86464836&utm_medium=post_embed&utm_source=embed&utm_name=&utm_content=comments
Fathers see their daughter as property, in a similar way that they see their wives as property. Letting someone defile your property feels cucked, especially if you are not getting something good in return (aka being a Chad, which is why Chad is more likely to get away with fucking JBs).
Another reason why age of consent laws are there, is because JBs are less aware of their value, since they haven't been hit on for so long. The reason why "pedophilia" (actually hebephilia) is scary to parents is because they dont think their daughter has high enough standards yet. 1 she might be more accepting of ugly guys. 2. The guy might have a chad face but since she is 12 if she RELIGIOUSLY eats enough she could grow taller than the chad in the future. 99.99% of men aren't jumping out of fuckin bushes at your daughter. Their morality is literally all about power oh and 3. A guy who is big enough FOREVER according to the parents beliefs might intimidate a young woman of 12. It's about her not being picky enough yet...at the deepest level...that's what it is. Threy aren't done programming her to want not just chad face...but really fuckin tall chad face. She aint ready for 6''6 chad yet. But 5'8 chad...thats a young womans fantasy..about as tall as some of her school interests...but testosterone enhanced.
View: https://youtu.be/X5QnqwsGxn0?t=3833
If you watch, the police dude says to him "what if that was your daughter".
You see, when people argue for AoC, they may say stuff like "what if that was your daughter", but they would never say "what if that was your son." The question is, why do they say daughter, and not son? Well, the answer should be obvious. It's because it's not about "protecting children", its about cockblocking men from prime teen pussy. In fact, when looking at age of consent laws, there are often different numbers depending on position of authority. For example, an adult fucking a teen, has a lower AoC (usually 16) than a teacher fucking their student (usually 18). However, people would be more appalled by a random adult male fucking a 16 year old female LEGALLY, then they would if they heard about a female teacher fucking her 16 year old male student lLLEGALLY. Which is confusing, because the law clearly would indicate a teacher fucking their teen student would be worse than a random adult fucking a random teen, since one has a position of authority, and the other does not.
Of course, it isn't confusing when you realize the law has a clear gender bias, which is to demonize male sexuality, as well as reduce competition for roasties who rode the cock carousel when they were younger. You see women complain all the time about men who date college aged females, it's all about jealousy and fear of competition, which would only be amplified if jbs who were sexual beings were legalized.
Age of consent laws are voted this way because fathers are too lazy to train their daughter not to be a whore, so they just vote in laws to cockblock older dudes from fucking their daughter. Of course, this doesn't end up working out since teen Chad just plows their JB daughter, which they also get uneasy about, but their hands are tied in that situation:
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskMen/comments/1fh8p0/why_are_fathers_so_weird_about_their_daughters/?utm_term=86464836&utm_medium=post_embed&utm_source=embed&utm_name=&utm_content=comments
Fathers see their daughter as property, in a similar way that they see their wives as property. Letting someone defile your property feels cucked, especially if you are not getting something good in return (aka being a Chad, which is why Chad is more likely to get away with fucking JBs).
Another reason why age of consent laws are there, is because JBs are less aware of their value, since they haven't been hit on for so long. The reason why "pedophilia" (actually hebephilia) is scary to parents is because they dont think their daughter has high enough standards yet. 1 she might be more accepting of ugly guys. 2. The guy might have a chad face but since she is 12 if she RELIGIOUSLY eats enough she could grow taller than the chad in the future. 99.99% of men aren't jumping out of fuckin bushes at your daughter. Their morality is literally all about power oh and 3. A guy who is big enough FOREVER according to the parents beliefs might intimidate a young woman of 12. It's about her not being picky enough yet...at the deepest level...that's what it is. Threy aren't done programming her to want not just chad face...but really fuckin tall chad face. She aint ready for 6''6 chad yet. But 5'8 chad...thats a young womans fantasy..about as tall as some of her school interests...but testosterone enhanced.
