Chudpreet
Exterminate All 3DPDs
★★★★★
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2023
- Posts
- 15,822
Do people who say this even know that there are entire countries/regions of the world that are mixed race? If you define race as genotype, there are multiple large populations today that descend from very genetically distant ancestral populations:
Latinx and Central Asians = West Eurasian + East Eurasian (throw Sub-Saharan African into the mix as well for Afro-Latinos)
South Asians = West Eurasian + Australo-Melanesian
Horn Africans = Sub-Saharan African + West Eurasian
Southeast Asians = East Eurasian + Australo-Melanesian
Are any of these regions known for producing lots of Chads and Stacies? I mean sure, LatAm and Southeast Asia may be well-known passport bro-ing destinations, but that's primarily due to their poverty (inb4 anyone brings up LatAm producing many models: most are genetically European or European-passing; e.g., Chico, Hernan Drago, Rodrigo Guirao Diaz, Adriana Lima). None of the above places are known for being attractive on average – on the contrary, they're known for producing truecels.
I really fail to understand where this "mixed race people are better-looking" lie comes from. I can see where apex fallacy might play into it – "most attractive people" to foids often means "most attractive Chads," and we know there's a culture of worship, particularly in America, around lightskin Chadlattos like Chris Brown, Kelly Oubre, and J. Meeks. Still, that doesn't seem to fully explain the prevalence of this myth. Of course, it's quite likely this tale was deliberately manufactured by the media as propaganda, and if not that, maybe it's just a cope created by single mothers from Tyrone that somehow went mainstream (like an old wives' tale ).
Whatever the case may be, I see the increasing race-mixing in the West and the rest of the world going either of two ways:
Latinx and Central Asians = West Eurasian + East Eurasian (throw Sub-Saharan African into the mix as well for Afro-Latinos)
South Asians = West Eurasian + Australo-Melanesian
Horn Africans = Sub-Saharan African + West Eurasian
Southeast Asians = East Eurasian + Australo-Melanesian
Are any of these regions known for producing lots of Chads and Stacies? I mean sure, LatAm and Southeast Asia may be well-known passport bro-ing destinations, but that's primarily due to their poverty (inb4 anyone brings up LatAm producing many models: most are genetically European or European-passing; e.g., Chico, Hernan Drago, Rodrigo Guirao Diaz, Adriana Lima). None of the above places are known for being attractive on average – on the contrary, they're known for producing truecels.
I really fail to understand where this "mixed race people are better-looking" lie comes from. I can see where apex fallacy might play into it – "most attractive people" to foids often means "most attractive Chads," and we know there's a culture of worship, particularly in America, around lightskin Chadlattos like Chris Brown, Kelly Oubre, and J. Meeks. Still, that doesn't seem to fully explain the prevalence of this myth. Of course, it's quite likely this tale was deliberately manufactured by the media as propaganda, and if not that, maybe it's just a cope created by single mothers from Tyrone that somehow went mainstream (like an old wives' tale ).
Whatever the case may be, I see the increasing race-mixing in the West and the rest of the world going either of two ways:
- Cultures become more hypersexual and generally R-selective like what you see among LatAms, and inceldom goes down
- Due to the inevitable drop in average looks levels (in tandem with modern feminism and hypergamy), inceldom reaches unprecedented growth rates