Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Misogyny doesn't exist.

Balding Subhuman

Balding Subhuman

If you're ugly, women want you dead
★★★★★
Joined
Dec 4, 2021
Posts
8,889

Gender attitudes research shows no misogyny, and actually philogyny

Misogyny formally defined is a putative male-to-female hostile or highly negative attitude; gender attitude, as it were. Gender attitudes, both male-to-female and female-to-male, most recently have been reviewed and freshly examined by Dunham, Baron & Banaji (2016), in a culmination of their own earlier work in various collaborations.

Dunham et al found for boys/men “no negative association with female whatsoever”

The contrast with girls/women in all respects is striking. All age groups are “robustly pro-female” — strongly positive towards females and strongly negative towards males – and all the more so with age.

This builds on much earlier research with groups (where subjects were given all-male and/or all-female groups as the target) likewise showing that, on explicit measures, by adulthood males as well as females have more positive attitudes towards females than towards males (Eagly & Mladinic, 1989; Eagly, Mladinic & Otto, 1991).

Their conclusions were that (regarding same-sex target groups) both sexes were more positive towards women than towards men; in particular in attitude, but also in terms of how responses were manifestations of beliefs (or stereotypes) about the sexes, and even in their emotional content (albeit a difference in this case that was not statistically significant). Notably, despite looking especially for covert negative sentiments towards women, none were found.

Whether in respect of responses that are automatic/default or considered, the findings here indicate misogyny is a fiction, with misandry, on the other hand, real.

Whatever term may be used to denote it, and however it is elided with and diluted by other notions, misogyny is a figment of ideological imagination. As such, it is not misogyny but a charge of misogyny that becomes itself the very contempt for or hatred towards the other sex it purports to call out. In other words, accusation of misogyny actually is itself a manifestation of hostile sexism in the form of misandry, making this the real phenomenon now in need of study.

That this actual sexism is not seen for what it is, shows up in research into bias in respect of sexism. Evidently, sexism of any form by females is unseen: not just women’s anti-male sexism (Rudman & Fetteroff, 2014; Goh, Rad & Hall, 2017), but also their anti-female sexism (Baron, Burgess & Kao, 1991); this being the perception of both males and other females.

Hence the great surprise that greeted the Demos findings in 2016 that the bulk of on-line misogynistic abuse, on Twitter, was by not men but by women. Goh, Rad & Hall replicated in inter-personal dyadic behaviour what Rudman and Fetterolf had found regarding groups: women being biased to (mis-)perceive hostile sexism from men when it isn’t there; conversely not seeing men’s benevolent sexism when it is (albeit regarding this last, Goh, Rad & Hall’s findings were not statistically significant). By contrast, men actually under-estimated women’s hostile sexism as well as over-estimating women’s benevolent sexism.
 
This is bullshit.

I am a certified misogynist. I would enslave all women and make them lose the right to be human beings.
 
This is bullshit.

I am a certified misogynist. I would enslave all women and make them lose the right to be human beings.
Copium because most likely you would simp for a woman for the next 12 years as a betabuxxer if she would let you fuck her rancid hole
 
Copium because most likely you would simp for a woman for the next 12 years as a betabuxxer if she would let you fuck her rancid hole
That time passed, crackie; no rancid hole for my face.
 
Systemic mysoginy, like the feminists describe it, has never existed. Modern society has always been gynocentric, even during patriarchy. There are many biological biases that prevent mysoginy from taking place, like women-are-wonderful effect, female in-group bias and simping.

What we have is learned mysogyny or reactive mysogyny. Men who have had nothing but awful experiences with women, who have had their basic needs denied, who have been the victim of mistreatment and bullying because of women have adopted mysogyny as protection mechanism. In other words no men is born a mysogynist, we learn it by interacting with women.

Misandry is a whole different story. Just like there are positive bias towards women, there are negative ones towards men. And add to that all the systemic misandry present in the legal system, institutions, media, etc....
 
This is bullshit.

I am a certified misogynist. I would enslave all women and make them lose the right to be human beings.
You have learned mysoginy as a defense mechanism. If they treated you fairly, you wouldn't be one.
 
Normies:"Virginity is just a social construct"

Misogyny is also a social construct
 
You have learned mysoginy as a defense mechanism. If they treated you fairly, you wouldn't be one.
also he would fold the moment he gets a foid to date and will become even more pro foid if he will have a daughter
 
also he would fold the moment he gets a foid to date and will become even more pro foid if he will have a daughter
True, but that's true to any of us. If a foid happens to go against their mainstream and date an incel, she deserves the benefit of doubt.
 

Similar threads

Lv99_BixNood
Replies
16
Views
158
Grodd
Grodd
Nograsscel
Replies
6
Views
146
dead.ahead
dead.ahead
Deep.Nest
Replies
6
Views
154
THE TRUE GIBLET
THE TRUE GIBLET

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top