B
bonesmashing
There's no inhib-level for your face.
★★★
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2021
- Posts
- 279
Many say "jaw is law" and think that a longer midface won't break good looks -- I think otherwise. In the majority of these low-effort examples their sex appeal/looks are CUT IN HALF AT LEAST. Some still manage to remain appealing and hardly take much damage, but I'd say a short midface + overall good features and dimorphism = Chad; as it gets longer = sub Chad 99% of the time, regardless of features (depends on guy).
I didn't even go THAT extreme, but made this standard horseface-tier length. Immediately most are rendered as sub Chads. Meeks would never pull off a long midface and keep his looks. "Jaw is law" yet the great mandible of Cavill won't hold up well to having a much bigger EME angle, midface length, etc. I know it's low effort but I think it gets the point across that a long-ish midface almost always murders male looks. I'm stating that some guys can take length/still not look ugly, but most Chads'll lose multiple points with just each 1/4th midface length increase.
ALL of them, except Cruise, look "goofy" and lose that "touch" that makes them GL/widely appealing. I still stand by midface/maxilla/etc. > mandible. While some guys with good faces can manage to not take AS BIG OF A HIT as less attractive guys, there's no case where a poorer EME angle/longer midface HELPS if it's already compact and you're like these guys are above naturally AKA a long midface ALWAYS IS A NEGATIVE even if it's not as big of a negative on every guy. Somehow some can take length & not lose much looks, but most of the time MIDFACE IS SIGNIFICANT.
I didn't even go THAT extreme, but made this standard horseface-tier length. Immediately most are rendered as sub Chads. Meeks would never pull off a long midface and keep his looks. "Jaw is law" yet the great mandible of Cavill won't hold up well to having a much bigger EME angle, midface length, etc. I know it's low effort but I think it gets the point across that a long-ish midface almost always murders male looks. I'm stating that some guys can take length/still not look ugly, but most Chads'll lose multiple points with just each 1/4th midface length increase.
ALL of them, except Cruise, look "goofy" and lose that "touch" that makes them GL/widely appealing. I still stand by midface/maxilla/etc. > mandible. While some guys with good faces can manage to not take AS BIG OF A HIT as less attractive guys, there's no case where a poorer EME angle/longer midface HELPS if it's already compact and you're like these guys are above naturally AKA a long midface ALWAYS IS A NEGATIVE even if it's not as big of a negative on every guy. Somehow some can take length & not lose much looks, but most of the time MIDFACE IS SIGNIFICANT.
Last edited: