@Yerberito and @Anonymous MG vs @Hate_my_life and @TruestBlackCel who will win
Podcast guest when
Based beaners
Idk ese
D
Uh.... cause black people started looting everything and attacking everyone in sight?
I thought South Africa would have a race war before us.
Black people: Destroys entire cities, burn down innocent people's buisnesses, rob and murder innocent people daily
Eveybody else: *Starts defending themselves by fighting back against black people*
Black people: https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/027/475/Screen_Shot_2018-10-25_at_11.02.15_AM.jpg
Eveybody else: *Starts defending themselves by fighting back against black people*
Black people: https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/facebook/000/027/475/Screen_Shot_2018-10-25_at_11.02.15_AM.jpg
I thought I already posted on this thread?
it's always been the case that when the mexicans finish taking over the south west the blacks are gonna have a real bad time
Lmao wtf
It's funny because beaners in the west stole a lot of their culture from joggers
It's funny because beaners in the west stole a lot of their culture from joggers
My fart will win
R
The beaners seem nice but I had beef the blacks
R
R
Most the incas died cause of flue added to that both were equally as bad 1 was cannabilstic subhumans the other are rape baby makers.
Meanwhile shaka speared fear onto men without needing to eat human flesh
I will win.
I see, that should be a interesting war.
R
1 Can i have a source for the cannibal claim i tried looking on Wikipedia for it it and you would think if this was a well known thing you would at the very least find it on Wikipedia if it's not on their most likely it was a obscure thing and was not practiced by society as a whole.
Meanwhile just type in the Aztecs on google go onto the Wikipedia page human sacrifice is a way of life not to say wikipedia is the sole arbiter of truth but if something as blatant as human sacrifices were occurring you would think they would at-least hint at it.
2 From what i'm aware the The Spaniards were fighting against a homogeneous empire with larger numbers meanwhile the zulu were smaller tribes that right their calls for respects not only that they had differences in beliefs and traditions they even had wars solely based of faiths meanwhile the Aztecs were more homogeneous it's easier to fight your opponents when your not fighting your own i want to see how long the Spaniards would have lasted with a homogeneous Zulu empire.
3 You seriously delusional if you don't think people of the same groups fight over petty reasons just look at european history to show you the pettiness
R
Are you seriously this big of a reddit faggot that you immediately go to "GOT A SOURCE FOR THAT??? AINT ON WIKIPEDIA!" when you were just doing incel vs chad memes and banter? Sorry I upset you, niggers are awesome, the best, yay niggers, you can go back to your blacked porn now.
According to Julian Cobbing, the development of the view that Shaka was the monster responsible for the devastation is based on the need of apartheid era historians to justify the apartheid regime's racist policies.[40] Other scholars acknowledge distortion of the historical record by apartheid supporters and shady European traders seeking to cover their tracks, but dispute the revisionist approach, noting that stories of cannibalism, raiding, burning of villages, or mass slaughter were not developed out of thin air but based on the clearly documented accounts of hundreds of black victims and refugees. Confirmation of such accounts can also be seen in modern archaeology of the village of Lepalong, an entire settlement built underground to shelter remnants of the Kwena people from 1827–36 against the tide of disruption that engulfed the region during Shakan times.[41]
Shaka - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Happy?
1 You have to trust what was being translated at the time was the original thing and not a distortion of what happened.
2 No 1 is denying cannibalism occurred in small numbers probably enemy tribes got sacrificed here or there never the less you can't seriously be arguing just cause cannibalism was practiced both of the 2 were equal also cannibal isn't the right word human sacrifice.
3 The difference between human sacrifice on small taboo scales to enemies of war compared to what the aztecs did is that the aztecs killed their on people on record numbers from what i'm aware those killed in these sacrifices are neighboring tribes but the Norse tended to do this as well they didn't mass kill their own people though.
4TH from what i've read breifely cannibals were secluded to small areas they didn't live in any settlements we modernly use but in caves or bushes and we see this today secluded bandits kill albinos for there gods but there not the norm their the obfuscation of the norm
Terrific Majesty
Since his assassination in 1828, King Shaka Zulu--founder of the powerful Zulu kingdom and leader of the army that nearly toppled British colonial rule in South Africa--has made his empire in popular imaginations throughout Africa and the West. Shaka is today the hero of Zulu nationalism, the...
books.google.co.uk
5 I asked for a source cause i couldn't find anyone the Zulu people themselves practicing ritualistic human sacrifice was there small tenets that did sure but if your gonna moan at the zulu for that why not apply the same standard for the other pagans
beaners mog
Whoever wins, whites still get the blame for minority fighting
feels bad man
feels bad man
It'll be even worse when China takes over Africa. Niggers literally have no future lmao.
Bluepillers: 1
D
@BummerDrummer
you might think only white foids are being BLACKED but "latinas" are nigger "putas"
its over for beaners bro
lifefuel for blackcels
see how cucks are smiling while BBC is touch their sisters
you might think only white foids are being BLACKED but "latinas" are nigger "putas"
its over for beaners bro
lifefuel for blackcels
see how cucks are smiling while BBC is touch their sisters
Bantu vs. Aztec. White man wins
Similar threads
bcroger
Users who are viewing this thread
