Serious MeToo movement starting in Bollywood is only targeting ugly men

[11gaijin]

Of course only ugly men are being framed for sexual harassment. Even currywhores don't want any ugly guys around them and so they are starting to play metoo over here so that all ugly males are sent to Jail. Problem s that 99% of men will be in Jail after this.

 

[Rassimov]

I heard that even looking at a woman in India can be considered sexual harassment by law.

 

[11gaijin]

I heard that even looking at a woman in India can be considered sexual harassment by law.

True, ugy currywhores don't want non-chad to look at them.

 

[RageAgainstTDL]

inb4 all Indian men are castrated for being short and ugly

 

[11gaijin]

inb4 all Indian men are castrated for being short and ugly

 

[Varys]

This is why I would always choose being rice over curry because at least you could J-PopMaxx jfl at BollywoodMaxxing.

 

[11gaijin]

This is why I would always choose being rice over curry because at least you could J-PopMaxx jfl at BollywoodMaxxing.

View attachment 50180

Hmmm I won't argue man. Curryies can still have aryan features and the best curyr mog best asians but that isnt the conevsation I want to go into now. Quite drubk tbh,

 

[Varys]

Hmmm I won't argue man. Curryies can still have aryan features and the best curyr mog best asians but that isnt the conevsation I want to go into now. Quite drubk tbh,

I'm just shooting the breeze.

 

[DahmerBoy]

This MeToo movement is a power move from women against men. It's detrimental to the male-female relationship which is already greatly damaged. They are laying the ground for a future moral paradigm shift and they will be the victims of it.

 

[Rice Cel]

Damn even Bollywood is falling for that shit now? Ridiculous

 

[Deleted member 6214]

Problem is that 99% of men will be in Jail after this.

 

[RageAgainstTDL]

This has been said a hundred times before, but the big problem with all this "METOO" stuff is that it is absolutely necessary for the survival of the species for men to be sexual aggressors. In almost all species related to ours, it is the male who is dominant and initiates the sexual coupling. Sometimes the female wants it. Sometimes she doesn't. Sometimes she pushes him off. Sometimes she lets him finish.

This is nature.

I am not saying men should go around raping women randomly. But when you criminalize (either in actual law or the law of public opinion) any man for making an advance on a woman that she then decides she didn't like, you castrate the primary mechanism by which the species survives. By definition, almost all male advances on women will be unwanted, and some degree of aggression is part of a necessary process.

Are we to believe women are going to propagate the species by making sexual advances to men? Maybe that will work for 5-10% of women/men. Most women don't even want to be the aggressors on places like Bumble when they get their pick of Chads.

The other problem with it is that the workplace used to be a common place for men and women to bond and find relationships. Now that is illegal. So where are we supposed to meet mates and pair up? On Tinder which favors only the top 10% of men? In bars and clubs where again the same is true? Women don't have hobbies. Try going to a MeetUp group for any interest and you will find no single women. So what then?

Women are systematically working towards the destruction of the species. Men are continuing to give them power to enable their hypergamous tendencies. All this accomplishes is continually dropping birth, marriage, and sex rates like we're seeing in the west.

The only way I can see the species surviving at this rate is if we work out artificial means (eg. artificial wombs). Women have no interest in being women any more. I don't particularly care about humanity one way or another, but I find it interesting that so few people can see where all this is heading.

 

[Onezero]

Just let it all burn

 

[Lord Byron]

This MeToo movement is a power move from women against men. It's detrimental to the male-female relationship which is already greatly damaged. They are laying the ground for a future moral paradigm shift and they will be the victims of it.

Someone get this man a research grant and an award.

 

[Ataris]

This has been said a hundred times before, but the big problem with all this "METOO" stuff is that it is absolutely necessary for the survival of the species for men to be sexual aggressors. In almost all species related to ours, it is the male who is dominant and initiates the sexual coupling. Sometimes the female wants it. Sometimes she doesn't. Sometimes she pushes him off. Sometimes she lets him finish.

This is nature.

I am not saying men should go around raping women randomly. But when you criminalize (either in actual law or the law of public opinion) any man for making an advance on a woman that she then decides she didn't like, you castrate the primary mechanism by which the species survives. By definition, almost all male advances on women will be unwanted, and some degree of aggression is part of a necessary process.

Are we to believe women are going to propagate the species by making sexual advances to men? Maybe that will work for 5-10% of women/men. Most women don't even want to be the aggressors on places like Bumble when they get their pick of Chads.

The other problem with it is that the workplace used to be a common place for men and women to bond and find relationships. Now that is illegal. So where are we supposed to meet mates and pair up? On Tinder which favors only the top 10% of men? In bars and clubs where again the same is true? Women don't have hobbies. Try going to a MeetUp group for any interest and you will find no single women. So what then?

Women are systematically working towards the destruction of the species. Men are continuing to give them power to enable their hypergamous tendencies. All this accomplishes is continually dropping birth, marriage, and sex rates like we're seeing in the west.

The only way I can see the species surviving at this rate is if we work out artificial means (eg. artificial wombs). Women have no interest in being women any more. I don't particularly care about humanity one way or another, but I find it interesting that so few people can see where all this is heading.

Wrong. Women are saving the race by indirectly preventing all 6/10's and under from ever sexually reproducing, while all fucking 8/10+ chads. If lucky the 7/10's will be servants and lower-class men who get the leftover women.

If this keeps up, the incel and normie population will be reduced to nothing, and every child will be a descendant of Chads.

There is literally no loss for women. They all get to share Chad, Chad gets all the women, and we fall to the wayside. And lets face it. We're too weak to do anything about the genetic culling.

 

[AsiaCel]

Lol male currycucks letting this happen

 

[currycel]

. In almost all species related to ours, it is the male who is dominant and initiates the sexual coupling. Sometimes the female wants it. Sometimes she doesn't. Sometimes she pushes him off. Sometimes she lets him finish.

This is nature.

Women are systematically working towards the destruction of the species. Men are continuing to give them power to enable their hypergamous tendencies.

Wrong, it is not nature for incels to have children. The way nature - or natural selection - works is that the gene pool is trimmed. Women are ensuring incel trash never pass on their genetics. Our inceldom is simply a manifestation of the process of natural selection.

In other species, losers like us wouldn't be able to fuck stacey, because 6'5 chad would protect her and the rest of his harem by beating up our 5'4 asses. Don't delude yourself into thinking the world would be any better in "nature".

 

[Ataris]

Wrong, it is not nature for incels to have children. The way nature - or natural selection - works is that the gene pool is trimmed. Women are ensuring incel trash never pass on their genetics. Our inceldom is simply a manifestation of the process of natural selection.

In other species, losers like us wouldn't be able to fuck stacey, because 6'5 chad would protect her and the rest of his harem by beating up our 5'4 asses. Don't delude yourself into thinking the world would be any better in "nature".

Actually the sexual reproduction strategy for incels like us was to steal/rape a woman and hope she becomes pregnant, or obtain sex in some other surreptitious way. This is why most incels tend to be higher IQ and "woke" to the workings of society - we need this intelligence and counter-think to subvert society and steal/manipulate/force an opportunistic chance at sex to pass along our genes.

Unfortunately the development of rape test kits, DNA evidence, abortion, and a variety of other factors along with structured marriage/dating has made it impossible to carry out this sexual strategy.

 

[RageAgainstTDL]

Wrong, it is not nature for incels to have children. The way nature - or natural selection - works is that the gene pool is trimmed. Women are ensuring incel trash never pass on their genetics. Our inceldom is simply a manifestation of the process of natural selection.

In other species, losers like us wouldn't be able to fuck stacey, because 6'5 chad would protect her and the rest of his harem by beating up our 5'4 asses. Don't delude yourself into thinking the world would be any better in "nature".

Women aren't having kids at all anymore. Most western countries have subreplacement reproduction rates since the 70s.

That's why Western governments love immigrants - only way to keep the system running since the "natives" won't breed anymore.

 

[Incellectual]

inb4 all Indian men are castrated for being short and ugly

 

[ChronicPaincel]

because 6'5 chad would protect her and the rest of his harem by beating up our 5'4 asses.".

Beating up your 5'4 ass...... I'd put a fucking knife in his throat!

 

[Deleted member 10124]

Just let it all burn

 

[11gaijin]

This has been said a hundred times before, but the big problem with all this "METOO" stuff is that it is absolutely necessary for the survival of the species for men to be sexual aggressors. In almost all species related to ours, it is the male who is dominant and initiates the sexual coupling. Sometimes the female wants it. Sometimes she doesn't. Sometimes she pushes him off. Sometimes she lets him finish.

This is nature.

I am not saying men should go around raping women randomly. But when you criminalize (either in actual law or the law of public opinion) any man for making an advance on a woman that she then decides she didn't like, you castrate the primary mechanism by which the species survives. By definition, almost all male advances on women will be unwanted, and some degree of aggression is part of a necessary process.

Are we to believe women are going to propagate the species by making sexual advances to men? Maybe that will work for 5-10% of women/men. Most women don't even want to be the aggressors on places like Bumble when they get their pick of Chads.

The other problem with it is that the workplace used to be a common place for men and women to bond and find relationships. Now that is illegal. So where are we supposed to meet mates and pair up? On Tinder which favors only the top 10% of men? In bars and clubs where again the same is true? Women don't have hobbies. Try going to a MeetUp group for any interest and you will find no single women. So what then?

Women are systematically working towards the destruction of the species. Men are continuing to give them power to enable their hypergamous tendencies. All this accomplishes is continually dropping birth, marriage, and sex rates like we're seeing in the west.

The only way I can see the species surviving at this rate is if we work out artificial means (eg. artificial wombs). Women have no interest in being women any more. I don't particularly care about humanity one way or another, but I find it interesting that so few people can see where all this is heading.

High iq

 

[history]

This guy has also been named in meetoo movement in India . Zulfi syed .

And I don't think a guy who is 5'11'' and who look like this is considered ugly in India

And most men who have been accused are not ugly either. They are just average looking Indian men.

 

[rabitter]

This has been said a hundred times before, but the big problem with all this "METOO" stuff is that it is absolutely necessary for the survival of the species for men to be sexual aggressors. In almost all species related to ours, it is the male who is dominant and initiates the sexual coupling. Sometimes the female wants it. Sometimes she doesn't. Sometimes she pushes him off. Sometimes she lets him finish.

This is nature.

I am not saying men should go around raping women randomly. But when you criminalize (either in actual law or the law of public opinion) any man for making an advance on a woman that she then decides she didn't like, you castrate the primary mechanism by which the species survives. By definition, almost all male advances on women will be unwanted, and some degree of aggression is part of a necessary process.

Are we to believe women are going to propagate the species by making sexual advances to men? Maybe that will work for 5-10% of women/men. Most women don't even want to be the aggressors on places like Bumble when they get their pick of Chads.

The other problem with it is that the workplace used to be a common place for men and women to bond and find relationships. Now that is illegal. So where are we supposed to meet mates and pair up? On Tinder which favors only the top 10% of men? In bars and clubs where again the same is true? Women don't have hobbies. Try going to a MeetUp group for any interest and you will find no single women. So what then?

Women are systematically working towards the destruction of the species. Men are continuing to give them power to enable their hypergamous tendencies. All this accomplishes is continually dropping birth, marriage, and sex rates like we're seeing in the west.

The only way I can see the species surviving at this rate is if we work out artificial means (eg. artificial wombs). Women have no interest in being women any more. I don't particularly care about humanity one way or another, but I find it interesting that so few people can see where all this is heading.

MeToo is only a thing in anglo or anglo-influenced societies. MeToo was non-existant in Europe, China, SE Asia, Africa.

MeToo will only harm high-inhib overly concerned soyboys. Chads and Dark Triad normies have never listened to feminists and never will.

This guy has also been named in meetoo movement in India . Zulfi syed .

And I don't think a guy who is 5'11'' and who look like this is considered ugly in India

And most men who have been accused are not ugly either. They are just average looking Indian men.

In the eyes of the foid, if you're curry you're automatically ugly.

Actually the sexual reproduction strategy for incels like us was to steal/rape a woman and hope she becomes pregnant, or obtain sex in some other surreptitious way. This is why most incels tend to be higher IQ and "woke" to the workings of society - we need this intelligence and counter-think to subvert society and steal/manipulate/force an opportunistic chance at sex to pass along our genes.

Unfortunately the development of rape test kits, DNA evidence, abortion, and a variety of other factors along with structured marriage/dating has made it impossible to carry out this sexual strategy.

Donating to sperm banks is still a valid incel-reproduction strategy

 

[micropenis29]

Wrong. Women are saving the race by indirectly preventing all 6/10's and under from ever sexually reproducing, while all fucking 8/10+ chads. If lucky the 7/10's will be servants and lower-class men who get the leftover women.

If this keeps up, the incel and normie population will be reduced to nothing, and every child will be a descendant of Chads.

There is literally no loss for women. They all get to share Chad, Chad gets all the women, and we fall to the wayside. And lets face it. We're too weak to do anything about the genetic culling.

 

[Deleted member 1060]

Wrong, it is not nature for incels to have children. The way nature - or natural selection - works is that the gene pool is trimmed. Women are ensuring incel trash never pass on their genetics. Our inceldom is simply a manifestation of the process of natural selection.

In other species, losers like us wouldn't be able to fuck stacey, because 6'5 chad would protect her and the rest of his harem by beating up our 5'4 asses. Don't delude yourself into thinking the world would be any better in "nature".

You have a cool avi boyo, chudur-budur likes it very much.