Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Men who use women for sex vs women who use men for support.

NorthernWind

NorthernWind

Paragon
★★★★★
Joined
Feb 13, 2021
Posts
17,544
Now, such groups as men who kidnap women and keep them in their homes and women who provide favors for handsome men in exchange for sex are irrelevant since they are very small part of population.

When men use women solely for sex, they usually provide something that women need.
Things like protection or money or place for living or some favors in repairing things etc.
While women who use men for utilitarian purposes usually didn't offer or provide anything for these men.
Some examples: flat owner who didn't charge money from female student and instead use sexual favors from her.
Simps are the opposite. They help women without getting anything in return.
How soyciety can believe that women are moral if they can use others without giving them that they need the most ( intimacy? )
 
Don't forget that if you pay taxes it mostly goes to foids while you get nothing in return. Then they turn around and say we are not "entitled" to sex while they themselves seem to be entitled to lots of things and fight to get these "entitlements".
 
Chad that raped and killed a foids mother and father are more deserving of intimacy, then a man that shows emotional and general support towards them.

"You aren't entitled to intimacy" when that's not the point.
It's the inconsistency that is the point.
Why is someone that doesn't see you as a woman with feelings and whatever, deserving of sex and intimacy, but a supportive man is doomed to be a beta cuck?
 
Chad that raped and killed a foids mother and father are more deserving of intimacy, then a man that shows emotional and general support towards them.

"You aren't entitled to intimacy" when that's not the point.
It's the inconsistency that is the point.
Why is someone that doesn't see you as a woman with feelings and whatever, deserving of sex and intimacy, but a supportive man is doomed to be a beta cuck?
Clown world
 
:bigbrain: IT will never touch this.
Only reading and posting the "NIGGER RAPE KILL KILL NIGGER" threads are more useful to them (Dehumanizing is part of the process of genocide), then the ones that question their logic.
 
Unfortunately men are not seen as human beings but rather as human doings. Even by the feminists who claim they hate sexism and want "equality."
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top