TeeHee Meet Lauren, a tall blonde communist that wont take anyone that makes under 6 figures.

[Deleted member 1060]

I am no longer on my phone so I can give you a long response. You are not thinking about the history of terror from communism. Have you ever lived in a communist country? I have. My family left and took me with them. It is not at all a good idea. Since the 1960s, its infected american politics, both parties have socialist tendencies now. Marx was a rich chad who never worked and took engel's money. He had a wife, kids and never worked.

We are sure. I lost family to famine and to purges. You will be the first to be purged and yet you welcome it.

No it can't. It can never do so, even in theory. I don't know where you get that idea.

You can choose not to work. You can choose not to buy products. So you are not at all forced to do anything. You mistake capitalism with suppy and demand. I really doubt I will be able to convince you, because you did not see the effects of communism, so you will like what sounds good but will never work. You think that its so great, go move to one and see what will happen.

Sorry for your loss man. But I can relate to your experience. In my case, I had to leave my country (curryland) because of a very fucked up sectarian violence, which is also a direct byproduct of capitalist system. By "sectarian violence" I mean you might see right wing people coming into your house and killing all of your family, just because you belong to a certain religious minority. But if we had a communist state we would not have that kind of shit. I could live in my country.

During the 80s, India used to be a close ally to USSR. During the 80s time our economy was not very strong (way weaker than US satellite state of Pakistan), but we had a strong goal towards an independent economy. Now after the fall of USSR, India changed her role completely, as soon as we embraced globalization, the whole country turned into a parasitic economy. If you compare our situation in the 80s, we have more money and jobs now, but we have basically nothing of our own, we are completely dependent on the economy of the west. If the economy in the west collapses for some reason, the entire country will become a rubble within a week. The current Indian gov is extreme right, which makes the lives of minorities more difficult. Also degeneracy is becoming mainstream day by day, since basically "globalization == westernization".

Yes, I must agree, communism is very prone to totalitarianism and dictatorship. But similar thing can happen in a fascist country too.

 

[Sparrow's Song]

She looks like she likes to get shit on.

 

[Guest37263]

The idea is nice of communism but it takes away 1. Freedom 2. Motivation. Nobody would produce anything anymore because there’s no motivation to become doctor if garbage man gets the same money as you

 

[Smallus Dickus]

BTW Poland during communism was the 10th largest economy in the world even up to the 80s. Same for the USSR. Now theyre economic midgets.

And yet my parents had to wait in que to buy toilet paper, and a sign of wealth was colorful shopping bag from the west. You don't know what you talking about, because you don't have experience with communism. USSR HAD to collapse because communism can't win with capitalism. Why should I go to work if my work is worthless? Or if I have to go there, why should I care? They will not fire me because everybody has to work, and even if they fire me I will find something different. And opposite in capitalism you work have some value.

Also, eastern europe was spared of nonwhite immigration, consumerism and sexual degeneracy that permeated western society which gives women far to much sexual privilege

Nothing to do with communism. Eastern Europe is still against immigration, Poland is still 99,5% european.
And 'funnily' enough sexual degeneracy was worse in communism. Yeah, government tried to make people happy and not to rebel. But as communistic regime they didn't have money. So they used nudity and sex. There's a lot, lot more of nudity in movies from communistic times than nowadays. Also rate of abortion was higher.
When you think about it, it's completely opposite. Nowadays Poland is quite conservative, and in communism it had to be 'progressive' as communism is far-left ideology. guarantee to you that live for incel was better in 50's USA than 50's USSR or east Germany or Poland.

Oh and btw I don't have money, nor connections and I was able to teach myself some IT stuff and opened small business. Just because I'm incel it doesn't mean I have to be lazy. Although nothing wrong about being lazy in capitalism, if you don't want to work, just don't.

You clearly don't know what you are talking about.

And nowadays incel problem is so big BECAUSE of communism and socialism. Without welfare, and 'help' for single mothers women would be more interested in men who could provide betabuxx. Why the fuck woman should be interested in average/below-average men in communism? She will not get anything from him, ANYTHING. The more socialism you introduce, the bigger incel problem will be

 

[Deleted member 15752]

The idea is nice of communism but it takes away 1. Freedom 2. Motivation. Nobody would produce anything anymore because there’s no motivation to become doctor if garbage man gets the same money as you

Exactly, everyone would be the same.

She looks like she likes to get shit on.

 

[Guest37263]

Exactly, everyone would be the same.

Also, survival is instinctual, which includes competing for resources and survival. While humans are communal animals, we still also follow social heirarchy, and its instinctually more desirable to be higher up in that heirarchy, so humans like to compete.

Communism takes away this instinct, cos no more competition. Thats an empty life, devoid of humanity.

 

[mybodyisrotting]

Simple solution, make pre-marital sex illegal.
Lack of financial motive will also curb female hypergamy to a really great extent. Also you can't have infinite supply of chads in a given population/age-group, they are always a minority. Therefore, as soon as the chads get locked down, women will be bound to look for sub-chad men to get married and all these things will boil down to homogeneous looks-matched couple.

You've made some extremely flawed assumptions in your post, one regarding the law system in a communist society and its enforceability and the other regarding the very nature of women.
In an ideal Marxist-communist system, democracy is absolute, which means that the common people (proles) have 100% power over the creation of laws. Do you actually believe that the mere thought of modern people voting for delegalization of premartial sex is even remotely plausible?
As for the anarcho-communist system, it is basically incompatible with the very concept of "locking people up". You could technically start your own commune with its own set of laws, but what would be the incentive for foids to join? Furthermore, the system has very limited ways of dealing with actual highly destructive crimes (murder, theft, destruction of property, pollution just to name a few) in practice, how do you think you could ever enforce a victimless crime like people rubbing each other's genitals consensually?
But here comes the biggest flaw in your reasoning - even if I give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you'd somehow be able to create a commune of free people where the population is 1:1+ male to female and who agree to the "no sex out of marriage or you're banished" rule, why do you think that the chadless foids, who have their material needs covered 100%, would choose to marry an ugly man over staying single?

BTW Poland during communism was the 10th largest economy in the world even up to the 80s.

First of all, Poland was never actually communist. Secondly, the "growth" that the country experienced in late 70s/early 80s was almost entirely based on the exorbitant amount of loans taken by the government from the western countries. This policy infamously failed so hard that, at the moment of transition around 1990, Poland had worse GDP per capita than fucking Ukraine.
By the way, could you provide a source on your claim? I'm talking specifically about the 10th place in the world thingie. I've spent some time searching for the evidence, and the only thing that comes even remotely close to your assertion is THIS which places Poland 10th in the 1980-85 bracket at GDP growth rate, not GDP per capita or anything like that. I'm pretty sure that Poland is right now at its peak since the late 16th / early 17th century Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.

 

[Ecstasy]

Commiecels, join the Nazbol alliance and lets get rid of 3D scum.

 

[Spec Carrot]

That has to be some kind of joke. A communist that desires wealth inequality and refuses to date outside of that capitalist idea. The only reason I'd believe it was real is because its a hole saying it.

 

[VincentVanCope]

Communism is low IQ so I'm not surprised.

Social Democracy is the high IQ ideology.

 

[mybodyisrotting]

Social Democracy is the high IQ ideology.

Low IQ tbh. Social Democracy is just a fancy name for capitalism that cucks men like us out of a large portion of their paycheck and redistributes that money to "underpriviledged groups". Have fun financing single moms/old people/ethnic refugees and getting absolutely nothing in return.

 

[Involuntarily]

Simple solution, make pre-marital sex illegal.

Lack of financial motive will also curb female hypergamy to a really great extent. Also you can't have infinite supply of chads in a given population/age-group, they are always a minority. Therefore, as soon as the chads get locked down, women will be bound to look for sub-chad men to get married and all these things will boil down to homogeneous looks-matched couple.

Can that be implemented without communism?

Sorry for your loss man. But I can relate to your experience. In my case, I had to leave my country (curryland) because of a very fucked up sectarian violence, which is also a direct byproduct of capitalist system. By "sectarian violence" I mean you might see right wing people coming into your house and killing all of your family, just because you belong to a certain religious minority. But if we had a communist state we would not have that kind of shit. I could live in my country.

Are you sure? Hitler was pro Indian independence. Ghandi called him a dear friend. He supported anti brit indians.

That's how communism works in real life:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_Operation_of_the_NKVD
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyn_massacre
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venezuela
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korea
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_communist_regimes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_communist_regimes

Have you never heard of pol pot? Communism kills.

 

[Deleted member 1060]

Are you sure? Hitler was pro Indian independence. Ghandi called him a dear friend. He supported anti brit indians.

I was talking about communal violence in 1992 and 2002. You are talking about stuffs that happened before 1945.

 

[Involuntarily]

I was talking about communal violence in 1992 and 2002. You are talking about stuffs that happened before 1945.

I am talking about reality, its not like they won't magically happen. You have weaseled out of every bad communist activity but I doubt you will ever admit its bad because of a new excuse everytime.

 

[VincentVanCope]

Low IQ tbh. Social Democracy is just a fancy name for capitalism that cucks men like us out of a large portion of their paycheck and redistributes that money to "underpriviledged groups". Have fun financing single moms/old people/ethnic refugees and getting absolutely nothing in return.

Yeah because getting ass raped and turned into a slave through debt by healthcare companies is completely uncucked.

Also the fear of not leaving a job you don't like because there is no social security system, so you're cucked in that regard too.

A few peanuts out of your tax dollars going towards people you might deem undeserving is a lot better than getting wallet raped by billionaires.

 

[SUH]

And yet my parents had to wait in que to buy toilet paper, and a sign of wealth was colorful shopping bag from the west. You don't know what you talking about, because you don't have experience with communism. USSR HAD to collapse because communism can't win with capitalism. Why should I go to work if my work is worthless? Or if I have to go there, why should I care? They will not fire me because everybody has to work, and even if they fire me I will find something different. And opposite in capitalism you work have some value.



Nothing to do with communism. Eastern Europe is still against immigration, Poland is still 99,5% european.
And 'funnily' enough sexual degeneracy was worse in communism. Yeah, government tried to make people happy and not to rebel. But as communistic regime they didn't have money. So they used nudity and sex. There's a lot, lot more of nudity in movies from communistic times than nowadays. Also rate of abortion was higher.
When you think about it, it's completely opposite. Nowadays Poland is quite conservative, and in communism it had to be 'progressive' as communism is far-left ideology. guarantee to you that live for incel was better in 50's USA than 50's USSR or east Germany or Poland.

Oh and btw I don't have money, nor connections and I was able to teach myself some IT stuff and opened small business. Just because I'm incel it doesn't mean I have to be lazy. Although nothing wrong about being lazy in capitalism, if you don't want to work, just don't.

You clearly don't know what you are talking about.

And nowadays incel problem is so big BECAUSE of communism and socialism. Without welfare, and 'help' for single mothers women would be more interested in men who could provide betabuxx. Why the fuck woman should be interested in average/below-average men in communism? She will not get anything from him, ANYTHING. The more socialism you introduce, the bigger incel problem will be

Ah the good old "muh lines" anecdote, even though all these anecdotes vary wildly in timeframe. In bulgaria most people who lived during socialism say there almost weren't any lines and when they were , they were only during the late 80s. This is completely moot because those lines still existed during the free market in the 90s, and when they stopped existing, almost all of the products were overpriced pieces of trash. Id rather wait in line than not be able to afford foodstuffs, utilities and rent.

Worth of work is irrelevant. In capitalism, work is not only worthless(telemarketers are worthless, street advertisers, , but unbearable because the wages are still low but the working conditions and worktimes are worse.

In neoliberal capitalism, if youre fired, its amost impossible to find a job because there are always hundreds of candidates per position, no matter how worthless it is.


Poland is conservative? Are you fucking shitting me? Then how is it that polish women are some of the most degenerate whores today? I live in Bulgaria by a resort where polish college students go to drink and do drugs, and I saw 3 times drunk polish stacies fucking Nigerians on the street. Also, during socialism every man, no matter how poor could marry and fuck a prime girl after high school which had a high chance to be a virgin. Now the ages of loss of virginity in Eastern Europe are around 14-15, while even during the 80s most women didnt have sex until after marriage or in college.

Abortion rates are a result of shitty post stalin revisionism. During Stalinism, abortion was banned, and in a future socialist state it will be too.


If I dont want to work in shitty conditions under capitalism because Im lazy and low IQ, I starve and die. During socialism, I can work a stable low level job so I can at least have shelter and food. I will always choose the latter.

Fuck neoliberalism, fuck Walesa and fuck Pilsudski.

You've made some extremely flawed assumptions in your post, one regarding the law system in a communist society and its enforceability and the other regarding the very nature of women.
In an ideal Marxist-communist system, democracy is absolute, which means that the common people (proles) have 100% power over the creation of laws. Do you actually believe that the mere thought of modern people voting for delegalization of premartial sex is even remotely plausible?
As for the anarcho-communist system, it is basically incompatible with the very concept of "locking people up". You could technically start your own commune with its own set of laws, but what would be the incentive for foids to join? Furthermore, the system has very limited ways of dealing with actual highly destructive crimes (murder, theft, destruction of property, pollution just to name a few) in practice, how do you think you could ever enforce a victimless crime like people rubbing each other's genitals consensually?
But here comes the biggest flaw in your reasoning - even if I give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you'd somehow be able to create a commune of free people where the population is 1:1+ male to female and who agree to the "no sex out of marriage or you're banished" rule, why do you think that the chadless foids, who have their material needs covered 100%, would choose to marry an ugly man over staying single?


First of all, Poland was never actually communist. Secondly, the "growth" that the country experienced in late 70s/early 80s was almost entirely based on the exorbitant amount of loans taken by the government from the western countries. This policy infamously failed so hard that, at the moment of transition around 1990, Poland had worse GDP per capita than fucking Ukraine.
By the way, could you provide a source on your claim? I'm talking specifically about the 10th place in the world thingie. I've spent some time searching for the evidence, and the only thing that comes even remotely close to your assertion is THIS which places Poland 10th in the 1980-85 bracket at GDP growth rate, not GDP per capita or anything like that. I'm pretty sure that Poland is right now at its peak since the late 16th / early 17th century Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.

Except that taking loans is the exact way to keep an economy large. Most capitalist countries today take far more loans than they can pay off. Take Japan, the UK and the US for example. The real reason that the eastern bloc's economy crashed was because of corrupt economic planners which rose to prominence after Stalin's death didnt utilize the loans and profits for strengthening the economy, not because of socialism. Even then, the socialist system still survived for 3 more decades. BTW Ukraine in the USSR was one of the richest and most technologically advanced areas in the world, which produced warships and superheavy aircraft to space rocket engines. Its economic decline is pure out of oligarchs destroying that industry during capitalism, so implying that Poland was extremely poor because it was worse of than Ukraine is extremely dishonest.

You've made some extremely flawed assumptions in your post, one regarding the law system in a communist society and its enforceability and the other regarding the very nature of women.
In an ideal Marxist-communist system, democracy is absolute, which means that the common people (proles) have 100% power over the creation of laws. Do you actually believe that the mere thought of modern people voting for delegalization of premartial sex is even remotely plausible?
As for the anarcho-communist system, it is basically incompatible with the very concept of "locking people up". You could technically start your own commune with its own set of laws, but what would be the incentive for foids to join? Furthermore, the system has very limited ways of dealing with actual highly destructive crimes (murder, theft, destruction of property, pollution just to name a few) in practice, how do you think you could ever enforce a victimless crime like people rubbing each other's genitals consensually?
But here comes the biggest flaw in your reasoning - even if I give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you'd somehow be able to create a commune of free people where the population is 1:1+ male to female and who agree to the "no sex out of marriage or you're banished" rule, why do you think that the chadless foids, who have their material needs covered 100%, would choose to marry an ugly man over staying single?


First of all, Poland was never actually communist. Secondly, the "growth" that the country experienced in late 70s/early 80s was almost entirely based on the exorbitant amount of loans taken by the government from the western countries. This policy infamously failed so hard that, at the moment of transition around 1990, Poland had worse GDP per capita than fucking Ukraine.
By the way, could you provide a source on your claim? I'm talking specifically about the 10th place in the world thingie. I've spent some time searching for the evidence, and the only thing that comes even remotely close to your assertion is THIS which places Poland 10th in the 1980-85 bracket at GDP growth rate, not GDP per capita or anything like that. I'm pretty sure that Poland is right now at its peak since the late 16th / early 17th century Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.

Except that taking loans is the exact way to keep an economy large. Most capitalist countries today take far more loans than they can pay off. Take Japan, the UK and the US for example. The real reason that the eastern bloc's economy crashed was because of corrupt economic planners which rose to prominence after Stalin's death didnt utilize the loans and profits for strengthening the economy, not because of socialism. Even then, the socialist system still survived for 3 more decades. BTW Ukraine in the USSR was one of the richest and most technologically advanced areas in the world, which produced warships and superheavy aircraft to space rocket engines. Its economic decline is pure out of oligarchs destroying that industry during capitalism, so implying that Poland was extremely poor because it was worse of than Ukraine is extremely dishonest.

 

[bkdreamkb]

in a materialistic view capitalism just destroys communism. There is no comparison.
But tbh life was probably more fulfilling in soviet russia than in today's capitalist society. Government made sure the family institution was intact and monogamy was strong there, althought they had an atheistic state. Sure you wouldn't have a japanese handmade masturbator but you would have a family and bread on the table at least.

 

[mybodyisrotting]

Yeah because getting ass raped and turned into a slave through debt by healthcare companies is completely uncucked.
(...)
A few peanuts out of your tax dollars going towards people you might deem undeserving is a lot better than getting wallet raped by billionaires.

"A few peanuts" . Large socialist programs tend to grow like tumors that they are. In practice, you pay enough money for 1-2 procedures at a private clinic every month, and in return you have unlimited access to healthcare that you never fucking use, because the wait times are ridiculous and the quality of service is basic at best.
I live in an EU country with socialized healthcare, and I end up paying for both this thievery and for private clinics anyway, since they are the only way of getting anything done in a good amount of time and with proper care. The queues and waiting lists in state-funded clinics are chock full of old people and foids with their kids, and they all have a lot more time and nerves to spare than you do, wagie boy.
I'm assuming you live in the US and it's a "grass is greener" thing for us. Personally, I think that a state-level emergency care insurance + private healthcare would be the absolute best solution.

Also the fear of not leaving a job you don't like because there is no social security system, so you're cucked in that regard too.

Relying on the gubmint for social security is not a smart thing to do tbh. Save money and invest. I earn peanuts but live frugally and save most of my paycheck so that I might eventually give myself a proper retirement at around 40 yo (at least that's the plan, hope it works out).
The only good reason for a man to support social democracy is wanting to achieve perma-NEETdom. Otherwise it's a system that cucks single wageslave men like us the most.

Except that taking loans is the exact way to keep an economy large. Most capitalist countries today take far more loans than they can pay off. Take Japan, the UK and the US for example. The real reason that the eastern bloc's economy crashed was because of corrupt economic planners which rose to prominence after Stalin's death didnt utilize the loans and profits for strengthening the economy, not because of socialism. Even then, the socialist system still survived for 3 more decades. BTW Ukraine in the USSR was one of the richest and most technologically advanced areas in the world, which produced warships and superheavy aircraft to space rocket engines. Its economic decline is pure out of oligarchs destroying that industry during capitalism, so implying that Poland was extremely poor because it was worse of than Ukraine is extremely dishonest.

Capitalist economies produce a lot of surplus goods and services so debt isn't a big deal. It is, in fact, suboptimal for a capitalist state not to be in debt, as it means having potential for growth that is still untapped.
For the state socialist economies such as the Soviet Union and its satellites back in the day, being in debt with capitalist economies is a disaster waiting to happen, as they pretty much can't even manage to provide enough basic goods to the citizens. So they either make their own citizens impoverished to pay off the lenders or they let the debt accumulate and eventually it's at the point when the state socialist economy either starts a conflict or becomes a little slave baby boy.
I'm pretty sure that even some random small western european country like Belgium mogged the shit out of Poland's and Ukraine's economies combined, so unless you're gonna back up your statements with actual statistical evidence, I'm not willing to argue with you.

 

[KilluminoidBR]

Completely deluded. How many millions died to "eradicate hunger"? It elimiated misery? Not worth responding to except to ridicule these delusions.

Its not that isnt worth responding, is that you just have no arguments because you know that you dont know shit about what you are talking about and that you are only reproducing imperialist propaganda. Simple as that.

I hope this is bait

No its not. Im talking 100% seriously.

 

[Don’t Mog Me Bro]

I wonder why most communism supporters are women and poor people with low IQs

 

[mybodyisrotting]

No its not. Im talking 100% seriously.

In that case, can you show me the evidence which you're basing your claims on? I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt by assuming that by "eradicated" you meant "reduced to a level unparalleled in any other country at the time". There are several historical events that took place in the USSR that involve mass starvation / mass killings which disprove your first two claims, and combating homelessness / unemployment by putting millions of people in forced labor camps isn't really something that a reasonable person could get behind.

 

[Involuntarily]

Its not that isnt worth responding, is that you just have no arguments because you know that you dont know shit about what you are talking about and that you are only reproducing imperialist propaganda. Simple as that.

Communism failed. Simple as that.

 

[Legionarivs]

This bitch isn't even close to being a communist. A communist system would ensure that every single man gets his own woman to breed with. She wouldn't be able to simply choose rich men (lol at her only going for the top tier in a capitalist system despite larping as a communist).

Stalinism is patriarchal. It's also nationalistic. Stalinism is best communism.

This. Even if I'm more on the Fascist side I totally support my Stalinist and National Bolsheviks bros while I totally hate the self-proclaimed "communists" who are nothing more than leftist liberals, like this bitch who asks for a man with at least 6 figures.