starcrapoo
I'M TIRED OF NOT BEING ABLE TO GET NO PUSSY MANNN
★★★★★
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2020
- Posts
- 10,635
- Online time
- 16h 28m
Jesus rocking the jew fro
Real Jesus (Isa) wasn't brownJesus was brown
Christians mock their own god
Yes, it's quite likely. Jesus was born in Galilee in the 1st century, a region of the Middle East. The Jews of that time had ancestry from the Levant—the same region as Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria today. What this suggests about his appearance: - *Skin*: Olive to light brown skin. Not pale white like in European paintings, nor dark black. The people of the region had darker skin than the European average to protect themselves from the strong sun. - *Hair and eyes*: Dark brown to black. Wavy or curly hair was common. - *Height*: On average 1.60m to 1.70m, thin and with the build of a worker, since he was a carpenter. Archaeologists and forensic anthropologists have reconstructed skulls of 1st-century Jews found in Jerusalem. The reconstructions show a face with Semitic features: a wider nose, medium forehead, and strong chin. Images of Jesus as blond, blue-eyed, and very fair-skinned come from European paintings of the Middle Ages and Renaissance. Artists depicted him as resembling the people of the region where they lived. So yes, the region explains a lot: a Jew from Galilee in the 1st century would have looked like someone from the Middle East today, not a European.Real Jesus (Isa) wasn't brown
he was white
stop lying
Cuckstianismo
O verdadeiro Jesus (Isa) não era moreno.
ele era branco
Pare de mentir
He was rosy white skin or a little reddish white skin, He wasn't light brown or oliveYes, it's quite likely. Jesus was born in Galilee in the 1st century, a region of the Middle East. The Jews of that time had ancestry from the Levant—the same region as Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria today. What this suggests about his appearance: - *Skin*: Olive to light brown skin. Not pale white like in European paintings, nor dark black. The people of the region had darker skin than the European average to protect themselves from the strong sun. - *Hair and eyes*: Dark brown to black. Wavy or curly hair was common. - *Height*: On average 1.60m to 1.70m, thin and with the build of a worker, since he was a carpenter. Archaeologists and forensic anthropologists have reconstructed skulls of 1st-century Jews found in Jerusalem. The reconstructions show a face with Semitic features: a wider nose, medium forehead, and strong chin. Images of Jesus as blond, blue-eyed, and very fair-skinned come from European paintings of the Middle Ages and Renaissance. Artists depicted him as resembling the people of the region where they lived. So yes, the region explains a lot: a Jew from Galilee in the 1st century would have looked like someone from the Middle East today, not a European.
Not trueJesus was dark-skinned
You're mistaken, Jesus didn't have white skin and blue eyes like some idiots portray him.He was rosy white skin or a little reddish white skin, He wasn't light brown or olive
No he was white, Islam told us thisJesus didn't have white skin
He didn't have blue eyesblue eyes
The source of Islam is completely wrong.No he was white, Islam told us this
He didn't have blue eyes
The source of Islam is completely wrong.
It's not that God spoke through Moses and the prophets, the Quran is a joke, 72 virgins.![]()
![]()
![]()
your bible corrupted to hell lol
What do you want to know?prove
song of solomon![]()
![]()
![]()
Let's get straight to the point: What the Hebrew text says: Song of Solomon 5:16 ends like this in Hebrew: “_Hikko mamittakim we kullo machamadim. Zeh dodi wezeh rei’i, benot Yerushalayim_” Translated: “His mouth is sweet, and all of him is desirable. This is my beloved, this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem.” Where does the claim come from: The Hebrew word machamadim מַחֲמַדִּים means “desirable, lovely, precious.” It is a plural of intensity in Hebrew, like “very desirable.” Since “Muhammad” in Arabic is Muhammad مُحَمَّد, which means “the praised one,” some argue that _machamadim_ would sound similar and would be a prophecy. 1. Grammar: Machamadim is an adjective/substantivized adjective, not a proper noun. It has the plural suffix -im and ends in -dim. If it were a proper noun, it wouldn't have that ending. 2. Context: The entire chapter 5 is the woman in the poem describing her beloved physically—lips, arms, belly, legs. It's erotic love poetry, not prophecy. From verse 10 to 16 she describes the beloved's body. 3. The use of the word _Machamad_ appears in other places in the Old Testament, such as Ezekiel 24:16, "the _machamad_ of your eyes" = "the desire of your eyes," clearly not a name. Therefore, Hebrew, Jewish, and Christian linguists understand that it simply means "he is utterly desirable," not a name. Why did the Muslim tell you this? This interpretation has existed since the Middle Ages in interreligious debates. Some Muslim scholars use this to defend the idea that Muhammad was prophesied about in the Bible. Other Muslims don't even use this argument because they recognize the problem.prove
song of solomon![]()
![]()
![]()
i didn't come this far in life believing he was a BALACK man.
my Jesus was a wigger. I have a carpet of the last supper that almost covers my entire wall. looking at him i can tell he has a warm bright skin but he is not black he looks very bright. stop with the BALACK washing and DEI ing of my faith.
I'm not that mad but it should be common knowledge that he was a bright skin fellow.
Goat has a fren in Magog.He was described in the Prophecy as looking most ordinary, so that you wouldn't even notice him in a crowd. Only the gift of speech and wisdom distinguished him from the crowd.
they look Georgian





