Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Maximising your genes (is dating a Becky worth it?)

Zhou Chang-Xing

Zhou Chang-Xing

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Feb 16, 2022
Posts
9,620
I got a couple of what I call "Lidlpills".

My mother is a Black nationalist and a Black supremacist, she exclusively goes out with other Blacks and many of them are even worse Black nationalists (some are even asylum seekers from Africa that somehow hate White people, despite owing their safety to us). Despite this my father had blonde hair and blue eyes. Apparently she's not the only one, from one of her "Black power" clubs she met another Black toilet she told me about, last week I met that toilet at the Lidl and I was surprised to see what I saw.

I saw an obese African toilet wearing traditional African clothes walking with a pale blonde child with light blue eyes, at first I thought that she might be babysitting but then thought that her daughter was getting cucked... No, right?! Only Asian toilets get cucked and raise another toilet's kids, no other toilet would ever have such low dignity to get cucked, right?!

Yes, I was right, her Mulatta daughter came and I realised something, this toilet successfully practiced Blanquemiento.

Screenshot 20220722 225010



I was watching this painting IRL, a pure White-looking son. This isn't rare at all, I think that if the Netherlands would stop all immigration today that by the end of the century it could become a full White country again. In fact I commonly see Mulatta's do this. Obviously, White children have a higher SMV, but as Blacks have the lowest SMV, having a Mulatto son is better than a fully Black one.

The second "Lidlpill" happened today, I was there again to buy stuff and I saw a mother daughter couple, the mother was in her 80's and daughter in her 50's, the mother was 6'3 and the daughter looked around 5'7~5'8. While the mother was super lean the daughter had a beautiful chubby body, a chubby body I know that I find attractive but most men would probably see as inferior to a thinner toilet.

In this case I witnessed dysgenics, a tall lean toilet giving birth to a short chubby one. I quite often see tall toilets with short partners, I think that a lot of tall Dutch toilets have "a short fetish" and the fact that the average height in the country is decreasing might be a testament to this.

Looking at these people I constantly think, "How can I maximise the SMV of my future sons to not doom them to inceldom". Obviously beggars can't be choosers, but even if we'd have to settle for a Becky, we would have to make choices.

An ugly friend of mine who went SEAmaxxing begged his wife to abort any boys and she got angry and refused to abort. So even if you get a Becky you can't force her to abort your sons because she'll resent you for asking that for the rest of her life, he told me that she refused more children because he demanded an abortion.

So unless you get a daughter the chances of your genes being transcended into the next generation becomes slim, if we're incels then why wouldn't our sons be? Well, the only answer I can think of is Stacymaxxing but I don't want to become a Standardscel.

But if you have to settle for a Becky, is it even worth it to reproduce with her?

Does Becky actually produce genetically worthy offspring? :blackpill::blackpill::blackpill:
 
I’m not reading that but to answer the question from your last sentence.

Yes.
 
So unless you get a daughter the chances of your genes being transcended into the next generation becomes slim, if we're incels then why wouldn't our sons be?
Okay first thing first i should point out the importance of the mother and daughter slut bond; women especially attractive sluts would want to have an identically privileged daughters possessing high socio-sexual values or ones that would essentially surpasses their own attractiveness and sociosexuality; thus why they would only procreate with the most perceived physically attractive men ''chads and ethical equivalents'' to further ensure the continuation of their whoring legacy! its all part of the parental investment theory.

(logically speaking a slut that has enjoyed ridding the dicks of chads and living on tutorial mode without having to earn a thing would want nothing less for her daughters, they're the rightful successors of her whoring legacy! thus the importance of looks-based hypergamy)

and for attractive women the odds of having daughters are skyrocketing ''implication of the generalized Trivers-Willard hypothesis (gTWH)'':

its no wonder that evolution is driving women to become more attractive; as science has indeed indicated
While men remain as aesthetically unappealing as their caveman ancestors.

According to a series of studies of physical attractiveness and its links to reproductive success in humans, researchers found that pretty women have more children than their plainer counterparts and that a higher proportion of those children are female. Those daughters, once adult, also tend to be attractive and so repeat the pattern.

In the research, Markus Jokela, a researcher at the University of Helsinki, found beautiful women had up to 16 percent more children than their plainer counterparts.

To reach the conclusion, Jokela used data gathered in America, in which 1,244 women and 997 men were followed through four decades of life, reports The Times.

‘sexy daughters’ phenomenon:

Evolutionary biology has sex bias here, since selection is usually couched in terms of male-trait inheritance.
in a study it was found that:

– women will choose the most attractive of the men who are available and attainable. women who choose feminine men may benefit in the first generation when the female offspring be attractive.

this phenomenon was illustrated through the following study:

R.E. Cornwell & D.I. Perrett (2008)

what we found was a clear relationship between the attractiveness of the daughters and their parents. If you inspect Figure 6.3, you should be able to match parents and offspring through their average appearances.

Note that each face depicts not one person but a composite of fifteen people. To make these images, we sorted families according to the parents’ attractiveness.

We then identified the fifteen families in the collection in which the mums and dads scored highest in their combined attractiveness rating, and blended them to give composite images: one of the fifteen mums from the attractive couples, the other of the fifteen dads. Similarly we made composites from fifteen less attractive couples. As you may have guessed, mum and dad tended to be similar in attractiveness

competition for partners leads to matching in attractiveness. From the four composite parent faces, therefore, you should be able to choose which blend of dads is married to which blend of mums – one blended dad and one blended mum are better-looking than their counterparts. (The right couple represent the partners in the couples whom our judges decided were better-looking. Do you agree with them?) Interesting as this exercise may be, all it tells us is that attractive women marry attractive men.
 
, I think that a lot of tall Dutch toilets have "a short fetish" and the fact that the average height in the country is decreasing might be a testament to
That's because tall toilets don't have to worry about having a short son if the man isn't tall. I've found that your height is also heavily influenced by your mother. Sometimes more than your father.
 
But if you have to settle for a Becky, is it even worth it to reproduce with her?

Does Becky actually produce genetically worthy offspring? :blackpill::blackpill::blackpill:
If you're a youngcel, genetic engineering and designer babies could save our children if we manage to find a GF in the future.
 
Nature is the ultimate chadseeker. She's just very gradual and subtle in the way she disposes of the non-chads.

This particular generation with 'foids' & 'inceldom' is nothing but the last lap of the process beginning in the west, and the foids are nothing more than her sentinels.

Our genes are not up to the mark to get on the rollercoaster. And usually people are refused entry to rollercoasters for good reasons…

Im not going to be selfish enough to even risk subjecting another son to anything close to what i endured (i.e. an even worse life of inceldom). Especially as genetic status is likely to become even more of a part of wellbeing in future.

Thankfully foids have done an excellent job of overiding any mistakes my own biological urges could have pushed me into making - by simply not touching me with a 100 ft bargepole.
 
Last edited:
I feel more attracted to Becky's than Stacy's
 
Just don't reproduce at all. Seriously. Why do you want to bring another person in this crazy world?
 
But if you have to settle for a Becky, is it even worth it to reproduce with her?

Does Becky actually produce genetically worthy offspring? :blackpill::blackpill::blackpill:
If you have daughters, they are 90% certain to breed as well.

If you have only sons, they may have a hard time breeding.

An interesting idea is to buy eggs from poor stacy donors (e.g. eastern europe), fertilize them, select the sex of the embryo to be female, screen out all anomalies, and implant the foidling embryo in an even poorer 3rd word foidlet surrogate. That way you have at once the highest odds of having grandchildren, and you also improve (in one leap) your genetics considerably more than trying to naturally breed a becky.
 
Last edited:
I feel more attracted to Becky's than Stacy's

That's paradoxical isn't it? Then wouldn't that make them Stacies?

Could be juggernaut law though.
 
I got a couple of what I call "Lidlpills".

My mother is a Black nationalist and a Black supremacist, she exclusively goes out with other Blacks and many of them are even worse Black nationalists (some are even asylum seekers from Africa that somehow hate White people, despite owing their safety to us). Despite this my father had blonde hair and blue eyes. Apparently she's not the only one, from one of her "Black power" clubs she met another Black toilet she told me about, last week I met that toilet at the Lidl and I was surprised to see what I saw.

I saw an obese African toilet wearing traditional African clothes walking with a pale blonde child with light blue eyes, at first I thought that she might be babysitting but then thought that her daughter was getting cucked... No, right?! Only Asian toilets get cucked and raise another toilet's kids, no other toilet would ever have such low dignity to get cucked, right?!

Yes, I was right, her Mulatta daughter came and I realised something, this toilet successfully practiced Blanquemiento.

View attachment 641613


I was watching this painting IRL, a pure White-looking son. This isn't rare at all, I think that if the Netherlands would stop all immigration today that by the end of the century it could become a full White country again. In fact I commonly see Mulatta's do this. Obviously, White children have a higher SMV, but as Blacks have the lowest SMV, having a Mulatto son is better than a fully Black one.

The second "Lidlpill" happened today, I was there again to buy stuff and I saw a mother daughter couple, the mother was in her 80's and daughter in her 50's, the mother was 6'3 and the daughter looked around 5'7~5'8. While the mother was super lean the daughter had a beautiful chubby body, a chubby body I know that I find attractive but most men would probably see as inferior to a thinner toilet.

In this case I witnessed dysgenics, a tall lean toilet giving birth to a short chubby one. I quite often see tall toilets with short partners, I think that a lot of tall Dutch toilets have "a short fetish" and the fact that the average height in the country is decreasing might be a testament to this.

Looking at these people I constantly think, "How can I maximise the SMV of my future sons to not doom them to inceldom". Obviously beggars can't be choosers, but even if we'd have to settle for a Becky, we would have to make choices.

An ugly friend of mine who went SEAmaxxing begged his wife to abort any boys and she got angry and refused to abort. So even if you get a Becky you can't force her to abort your sons because she'll resent you for asking that for the rest of her life, he told me that she refused more children because he demanded an abortion.

So unless you get a daughter the chances of your genes being transcended into the next generation becomes slim, if we're incels then why wouldn't our sons be? Well, the only answer I can think of is Stacymaxxing but I don't want to become a Standardscel.

But if you have to settle for a Becky, is it even worth it to reproduce with her?

Does Becky actually produce genetically worthy offspring? :blackpill::blackpill::blackpill:
extremely autistic wall of text tbh
 

Similar threads

iblamelm
Replies
16
Views
246
stsaturn
stsaturn
trrrrrsarescary
Replies
9
Views
737
Grodd
Grodd
AutismKing
Replies
18
Views
843
Anonymoutron
A
MisspelledName
Replies
20
Views
209
MisspelledName
MisspelledName

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top