Serious Mathematical relationship between NT rating and looks

[SUH]

Let x be looks
Let y be NT level

x and y can be positive or negative

Let A be total SMV

Im wondering whats the relationship

 

[Deleted member 5861]

this is very very simple. Your smv is just the total desire females have for you after taking into account all your traits. WTF is up with the x/y?

 

[SUH]

this is very very simple. Your smv is just the total desire females have for you after taking into account all your traits. WTF is up with the x/y?

Gibbon IQ reply. I explained it in the post.

 

[Moustachcel]

COPE foids dont care for your iq

 

[Deleted member 5861]

Gibbon IQ reply. I explained it in the post.

You really insulting IQ's when you posted this poll? You may as well poll us if we breathe air.

 

[Total Imbecile]

A=x

y is irrelevant so its a plane

 

[SchrodingersDick]

x=A

or perhaps

(x*5)+y=A

 

[P-Chan]

NT level

wtf is this?

and its stupid
you forget factors like
Money
Charakter
Age
Status
and so on.

 

[SUH]

wtf is this?

and its stupid
you forget factors like
Money
Charakter
Age
Status
and so on.

Being neurotypical. Unless you're ultra high IQ, Character, money, and status cannot be achieved without being NT.

 

[Deleted member 2798]

Intersting question with some odd options. Probably just x + y = A.

A=x

y is irrelevant so its a plane

x=A

or perhaps

(x*5)+y=A

Pretty retarded.

"Chad doesn't is needs being NT!"

That's exactly what this question is trying to address.

Say A ≥ 10 as a requirement to get a foid.

So then Chad Chadlington III needs very little NT to succeed


x = 8 (maybe 97th percentile looks)
y = 2 (autism)

8 + 2 = 10

Well damn, Chad made it.

Decent-looking incel.

x = 5 (~50th percentile looks)
y = 3 (weird loner)

5 + 3 = 8

Too bad.

This is an obviously reductive model with omitted variables and simplified relations, but it's better than a looks-exclusive evaluation.

 

[SchrodingersDick]

Intersting question with some odd options. Probably just x + y = A.




Pretty retarded.

"Chad doesn't is needs being NT!"

That's exactly what this question is trying to address.

Say A ≥ 10 as a requirement to get a foid.

So then Chad Chadlington III needs very little NT to succeed


x = 8 (maybe 97th percentile looks)
y = 2 (autism)

8 + 2 = 10

Well damn, Chad made it.

Decent-looking incel.

x = 5 (~50th percentile looks)
y = 3 (weird loner)

5 + 3 = 8

Too bad.

This is an obviously reductive model with omitted variables and simplified relations, but it's better than a looks-exclusive evaluation.

Face - PSL face rating /100
Height - height percentile
Frame - average of wrists,bideltoid, and wingspan percentiles
NT - 0-100. 0 being not functioning braindead autist, 100 being coked out college frat chad bumping Gucci gang and smoking weed with a bcakwards hat
Dick - 0-100 of total dick volume..

^^add those up. minimum rating of at least 375 is needed to get a foid to get wet for you (average 75th percentile for all)

final score divided by 50 could also be your PSL rating.. example.. score a 375.. divided by 50 is 7.5. voila.

I think this works cause a true 9/10 would need to average 90th percentile in all fields.. someone with 90th percentile face, height, frame, NT, and dick is pretty damn rare..

 

[MarriedAndLookin4Fun]

I'm too low IQ to comprehend this