Experiment Many of us would be dead, the rest ascended

[SilentSoup]

I have a theory that violence was much more common in the uncucked pre-modern world and it was the great proving ground/solution to incel problems.

When you send all the young men off to war and a bunch of them die, this changes the gender dynamic because now women outnumber men. Women have to compete for men and us guys have MANY more opportunities.

The brutality of war changes people... the incel mentality of being high-inhib and removed from society would go away the instant you adapt to survival depending on the people around you. That kind of experience would make people toughen up and bond- basically everyone becomes like Chad, but only better, because they're working together and not just taking advantage of each other.

I also don't think that regular "Chads" would be as successful. A big brutal douche opportunist would find himself dead pretty quick in war, where survival depends on your ability to work with other people and "keep your head down".

It would explain a lot if our species has literally evolved for a bunch of us to be killed off in our early adulthood and then the rest pick up the pieces and get good lives... we're like kids in a sandbox where there's not enough toys to go around.

Final note, I'm not saying you should join a modern-day military... it's totally cucked. You won't be plundering cities. You probably won't even kill other people. Modern-day armies are almost universally bootlicker academies where you peel potatoes and mop floors all day. I think they're more like corporations than past militaries, where you'd either wind up bleeding out on the ground or you'd get to run wild plundering and raping (imagine that!).

 

[Michael15651]

I gotta give you credit, it is a good observation you are covering her.

 

[SilentSoup]

I gotta give you credit, it is a good observation you are covering her.

Thanks.

Nice quote in your sig, it's true too.

 

[AsiaCel]

I gotta give you credit, it is a good observation you are covering her.

 

[Johny.speiz]

Good observation, I believe that's why inceldom was lower before.

Nevertheless, nowadays "wars" are less dangerous for militaries in term of casuality than many cities in the US or in Mexico.
Thanks to technology, you don't really need to fight the enemy directly, just throw some armed drones, armed robots, missiles or artillery...

It's quite funny when you look the statistics of, per ex., US militaries causalities and compare them with homicide rates of some US cities.

 

[Michael15651]

Thanks.

Nice quote in your sig, it's true too.

Thanks

 

[Life Wasted]

This is how the baby boomers came about, bunch of men went to go die in war the ones who survived or stayed at home had a surplus of women to choose from, it was so easy.

Nowadays the opposite is true, foids have a huge surplus of men to choose from and times have never been harder for men.

 

[Deleted member 8353]

Well I guess the real question is, would you rather die in war than remain incel? As when comparing any two things, you have to look at the worst possible outcomes.

 

[Cuyen]

Good observation, I believe that's why inceldom was lower before.

 

[Vigil]

I would love to die for a cause that's righteous. If there were a war I would side against the USA and all capitalist globohomo "democracies" and gladly die in the most horrific way possible if it means I get to take shots at chad and score some sweet chad brain matter all over my boots.