Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Manletism is a problem that has no cure

F

FiveFourManlet

It only gets worse
-
Joined
May 17, 2018
Posts
4,718
Picture 91

This is the (hopefully) very familiar bell curve of statistics.

This specific one shows the probability of heights, for males and females. As you can see the bell curve for men is shifted to the right compared to the females curve.

This is because men are obviously taller than females on average.

Women complaining about short men have every right to do so and a completely justified.

Why? Because manletism is more like a curse, than just being 'unlucky', and they would never want their sons to be short as they know how bad they hate short men.

So what is my point?

My point is that (in theory) if we killed every single man and baby destined or that is already 5'7 or below, that would erase the problem of manletism right?

Wrong.

All that will happen is the male bell curve will shift to the right, along with the female bell curve also shifting to the right.

So what will happen is people in general will be taller, which will not solve the problem because now 5'8 guys will be seen as turbo manlets and men that are 6 feet 1 inches tall would be average.

This will also be the case lets say (in theory) if the women's curve stayed the same and only the men's curve shifted to the right, because this will cause a shift in women's preferences as men seem to be taller on average so the word 'short' will be redefined. Compared to if both curves shifted (which is what will happen if this theory did take place) which would mean (like i said) people as a whole will be taller on average making the choosing process natural and not based on what is short defined by social norms.

I also know what you are thinking, what about short women that are not killed off that are 5'0? The answer to that is there will always be statistical infrequencies or in English... anomalies. For example a 5'4 guy popping out of a 5'0 female that mated with a 6'4 chad.

There will always be this problem but if all men were killed off 5'7 and under, my point is that societies norms of 'short' would be redefined therefore meaning manletism doesn't have a specific height, it will always be there and there will be a time where 6'0 people will be manlets.

TL;DR: Manletism is a inevitable curse.
 
and tall guys impregnating midget females doesnt help
 
There is no reason you can't select for short women and tall men simultaneously.
 
We have the curse of the manlet, we are cursed to look the world from bellow.
 
What about killing tall men?
 
there's only one solution. figure out a way to predict a boy's height down to the inch, figure out a proper hormone profile to inject him with to get him up to a certain height.. let's say 6'2".. if a kid is gonna be 5'7" adult height, give him just enough to make him 6'2".. if a kid's gonna be 6', give him a little less.. give the projected 6'2" guys nothing.. something like 97% of the population is below 6'2", so you'd get a new male population consisting of 97% 6'2" guys and 3% over 6'2".. pretty fair..

and you wouldn't alter the girls heights at all obviously.. problem solved. nobody's DNA changes, people keep producing the same kids projected to be the same heights as today, and we just alter chemically so there's more stability In the SMP

if you banned makeup and cosmetic surgeries for women, and adminsitered HGH and test to all boys in inverse proportion to their projected adult SMV, you would cure inceldom, fix the SMP, and if hypergamy is gonna destroy civilization, you will have saved the world too.

the generation immediately preceding the first generation you try this on though, will be suuuuuper fucked.. an entire generation of chadlites and normies will become truecels with all these 6'2" morph's walking around.. lmao imagine how many ER events will happen
 
Last edited:
there's only one solution. figure out a way to predict a boy's height down to the inch, figure out a proper hormone profile to inject him with to get him up to a certain height.. let's say 6'2".. if a kid is gonna be 5'7" adult height, give him just enough to make him 6'2".. if a kid's gonna be 6', give him a little less.. give the projected 6'2" guys nothing.. something like 97% of the population is below 6'2", so you'd get a new male population consisting of 97% 6'2" guys and 3% over 6'2".. pretty fair..

and you wouldn't alter the girls heights at all obviously.. problem solved.
That would only solve the symptom of bad genes e.g. manletism, not tackle the cause of bad genes.
 
That would only solve the symptom of bad genes e.g. manletism, not tackle the cause of bad genes.
nobody cares about the cause of bad genes. only the effects of bad genes.. which are a product of the symptom.. in this case, heal the symptom and the problem disappears
That would only solve the symptom of bad genes e.g. manletism, not tackle the cause of bad genes.
Height is a huge chunk of SMV. this at least fixes that problem. test should fix the dimorphic part.. everybody walking around with wide flanged faces with big browridges.. the gap between incel and chad will get smaller
 
Last edited:
nobody cares about the cause of bad genes. only the effects of bad genes.. which are a product of the symptom.. in this case, heal the symptom and the problem disappears

Height is a huge chunk of SMV. this at least fixes that problem. test should fix the dimorphic part.. everybody walking around with wide flanged faces with big browridges.. the gap between incel and chad will get smaller
Yeah sure, but do you really think putting every manlet on growth hormone is in any way realistic?
 
Yeah sure, but do you really think putting every manlet on growth hormone is in any way realistic?
not at all lmao. purely theoretical mental masturbation. possible though
 
View attachment 40741

This is the (hopefully) very familiar bell curve of statistics.

This specific one shows the probability of heights, for males and females. As you can see the bell curve for men is shifted to the right compared to the females curve.

This is because men are obviously taller than females on average.

Women complaining about short men have every right to do so and a completely justified.

Why? Because manletism is more like a curse, than just being 'unlucky', and they would never want their sons to be short as they know how bad they hate short men.

So what is my point?

My point is that (in theory) if we killed every single man and baby destined or that is already 5'7 or below, that would erase the problem of manletism right?

Wrong.

All that will happen is the male bell curve will shift to the right, along with the female bell curve also shifting to the right.

So what will happen is people in general will be taller, which will not solve the problem because now 5'8 guys will be seen as turbo manlets and men that are 6 feet 1 inches tall would be average.

This will also be the case lets say (in theory) if the women's curve stayed the same and only the men's curve shifted to the right, because this will cause a shift in women's preferences as men seem to be taller on average so the word 'short' will be redefined. Compared to if both curves shifted (which is what will happen if this theory did take place) which would mean (like i said) people as a whole will be taller on average making the choosing process natural and not based on what is short defined by social norms.

I also know what you are thinking, what about short women that are not killed off that are 5'0? The answer to that is there will always be statistical infrequencies or in English... anomalies. For example a 5'4 guy popping out of a 5'0 female that mated with a 6'4 chad.

There will always be this problem but if all men were killed off 5'7 and under, my point is that societies norms of 'short' would be redefined therefore meaning manletism doesn't have a specific height, it will always be there and there will be a time where 6'0 people will be manlets.

TL;DR: Manletism is a inevitable curse.

Exactly. It's a zero sum game. For every man that wins in dating, 10 or whatever have to suffer.

It has the exact same returns as a pyramid scheme, except much worse.
 
View attachment 40741

This is the (hopefully) very familiar bell curve of statistics.

This specific one shows the probability of heights, for males and females. As you can see the bell curve for men is shifted to the right compared to the females curve.

This is because men are obviously taller than females on average.

Women complaining about short men have every right to do so and a completely justified.

Why? Because manletism is more like a curse, than just being 'unlucky', and they would never want their sons to be short as they know how bad they hate short men.

So what is my point?

My point is that (in theory) if we killed every single man and baby destined or that is already 5'7 or below, that would erase the problem of manletism right?

Wrong.

All that will happen is the male bell curve will shift to the right, along with the female bell curve also shifting to the right.

So what will happen is people in general will be taller, which will not solve the problem because now 5'8 guys will be seen as turbo manlets and men that are 6 feet 1 inches tall would be average.

This will also be the case lets say (in theory) if the women's curve stayed the same and only the men's curve shifted to the right, because this will cause a shift in women's preferences as men seem to be taller on average so the word 'short' will be redefined. Compared to if both curves shifted (which is what will happen if this theory did take place) which would mean (like i said) people as a whole will be taller on average making the choosing process natural and not based on what is short defined by social norms.

I also know what you are thinking, what about short women that are not killed off that are 5'0? The answer to that is there will always be statistical infrequencies or in English... anomalies. For example a 5'4 guy popping out of a 5'0 female that mated with a 6'4 chad.

There will always be this problem but if all men were killed off 5'7 and under, my point is that societies norms of 'short' would be redefined therefore meaning manletism doesn't have a specific height, it will always be there and there will be a time where 6'0 people will be manlets.

TL;DR: Manletism is a inevitable curse.

I've always said if you're a Manlet. You're an Incel for life.
 
In other words; the bottom 30% of men, in terms of height, will always be fucked.
 
The rope is the only solution
 
Manlets are the actual truecels.
 
sorry not sorry.

That's the spirit! Remind them of what brought them here in the first place. Some call it crab in a bucket, others call it tough love.

rd3tFzM.jpg
 
Never forget. The manlet is always cursed to mediocrity
 
It is a problem because of the high variance that height has. The higher the variance the more spread out the heights are in the population, leading to very large differences between individuals. Seeing a huge height difference of 20 cm for example is very common. If the heights were less spread out, it would mean that being tall would give a smaller advantage.

Here is how the curve would look with a very low variance (standard deviation of 1 cm):

tTpQu4h.png


As you can see the majority of people would be between 178 and 182 cm. The difference between those 2 heights is minimal. Being only 4 cm taller would give a very marginal dating advantage. So in essense the tallest in the population would have very small edge over the shortest in the population, in contrast to what is happening now, where the tallest have a huge advantage over the shortest.

I believe that this might eventually happen, due to sexual selection, genetic engineering, etc. And it will be better off for everyone and a solution to the height problem. I havent done research, but I believe that this is how the size distribution in some animals looks like. This is why in some species you rarely see incels.
 
Manletism is the worst curse in the world.
 
Brutal blackpill
 
height is relative, get your cumskin ass to S.E. Asia
 
there's only one solution. figure out a way to predict a boy's height down to the inch, figure out a proper hormone profile to inject him with to get him up to a certain height.. let's say 6'2".. if a kid is gonna be 5'7" adult height, give him just enough to make him 6'2".. if a kid's gonna be 6', give him a little less.. give the projected 6'2" guys nothing.. something like 97% of the population is below 6'2", so you'd get a new male population consisting of 97% 6'2" guys and 3% over 6'2".. pretty fair..

and you wouldn't alter the girls heights at all obviously.. problem solved. nobody's DNA changes, people keep producing the same kids projected to be the same heights as today, and we just alter chemically so there's more stability In the SMP

if you banned makeup and cosmetic surgeries for women, and adminsitered HGH and test to all boys in inverse proportion to their projected adult SMV, you would cure inceldom, fix the SMP, and if hypergamy is gonna destroy civilization, you will have saved the world too.

the generation immediately preceding the first generation you try this on though, will be suuuuuper fucked.. an entire generation of chadlites and normies will become truecels with all these 6'2" morph's walking around.. lmao imagine how many ER events will happen

I dont think it works like that. I went to the hospital to check on my ehight and growth and they did a bloodtest which showed all my hormone levels were normal and i am well into puberty. They said that no matter how much HGH they inject it wont make a difference.
 
I dont think it works like that. I went to the hospital to check on my ehight and growth and they did a bloodtest which showed all my hormone levels were normal and i am well into puberty. They said that no matter how much HGH they inject it wont make a difference.
I'm just saying theoretically, IF it were possible. that could be one solution. or if they invent new peptides or w/e.
 
I think any femoid who is heightist should get raped by a pack of rabid hyenas and killed slowly from blood loss by having incels throw bar darts at them until they die, then their slut corpses should be ground into cat food to feed their friend's cats...
 
I think any femoid who is heightist should get raped by a pack of rabid hyenas and killed slowly from blood loss by having incels throw bar darts at the until they die, then their slut corpses should be ground into cat food to feed their friend's cats...
Nah, slit the throat then fuck the wound.
 
5'8 is already turbo manlet lmfao.
 
Reminder these graphs underestimate the average height. Guys lie, and these stats include old people who are off the sexual market. The bottom line is that 6 feet is mandatory in 2018
 
my mother is 5'6'' and father 5'7'' but im 6'0'' I got very lucky
 
it's all face
height is important
but face is what mostly matters
 

Similar threads

Eternalifeofdoom
Replies
14
Views
311
Eternalifeofdoom
Eternalifeofdoom
qplein
Replies
15
Views
404
CEO of Simps
CEO of Simps
D
Replies
21
Views
728
anandkonda
anandkonda
Flick
Replies
23
Views
801
reveries
reveries
TingusKangas
Replies
36
Views
985
Jud Pottah
Jud Pottah

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top